Debugging and repair of description logic ontologies.

Thesis (M.Sc.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, 2010.In logic-based Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KRR), ontologies are used to represent knowledge about a particular domain of interest in a precise way. The building blocks of ontologies include concepts, relations and objects. Those can be combined to form logical sentences which explicitly describe the domain. With this explicit knowledge one can perform reasoning to derive knowledge that is implicit in the ontology. Description Logics (DLs) are a group of knowledge representation languages with such capabilities that are suitable to represent ontologies. The process of building ontologies has been greatly simpli ed with the advent of graphical ontology editors such as SWOOP, Prote ge and OntoStudio. The result of this is that there are a growing number of ontology engineers attempting to build and develop ontologies. It is frequently the case that errors are introduced while constructing the ontology resulting in undesirable pieces of implicit knowledge that follows from the ontology. As such there is a need to extend current ontology editors with tool support to aid these ontology engineers in correctly designing and debugging their ontologies. Errors such as unsatis able concepts and inconsistent ontologies frequently occur during ontology construction. Ontology Debugging and Repair is concerned with helping the ontology developer to eliminate these errors from the ontology. Much emphasis, in current tools, has been placed on giving explanations as to why these errors occur in the ontology. Less emphasis has been placed on using this information to suggest e cient ways to eliminate the errors. Furthermore, these tools focus mainly on the errors of unsatis able concepts and inconsistent ontologies. In this dissertation we ll an important gap in the area by contributing an alternative approach to ontology debugging and repair for the more general error of a list of unwanted sentences. Errors such as unsatis able concepts and inconsistent ontologies can be represented as unwanted sentences in the ontology. Our approach not only considers the explanation of the unwanted sentences but also the identi cation of repair strategies to eliminate these unwanted sentences from the ontology

Federated knowledge base debugging in DL-Lite A

Due to the continuously growing amount of data the federation of different and distributed data sources gained increasing attention. In order to tackle the challenge of federating heterogeneous sources a variety of approaches has been proposed. Especially in the context of the Semantic Web the application of Description Logics is one of the preferred methods to model federated knowledge based on a well-defined syntax and semantics. However, the more data are available from heterogeneous sources, the higher the risk is of inconsistency – a serious obstacle for performing reasoning tasks and query answering over a federated knowledge base. Given a single knowledge base the process of knowledge base debugging comprising the identification and resolution of conflicting statements have been widely studied while the consideration of federated settings integrating a network of loosely coupled data sources (such as LOD sources) has mostly been neglected. In this thesis we tackle the challenging problem of debugging federated knowledge bases and focus on a lightweight Description Logic language, called DL-LiteA, that is aimed at applications requiring efficient and scalable reasoning. After introducing formal foundations such as Description Logics and Semantic Web technologies we clarify the motivating context of this work and discuss the general problem of information integration based on Description Logics. The main part of this thesis is subdivided into three subjects. First, we discuss the specific characteristics of federated knowledge bases and provide an appropriate approach for detecting and explaining contradictive statements in a federated DL-LiteA knowledge base. Second, we study the representation of the identified conflicts and their relationships as a conflict graph and propose an approach for repair generation based on majority voting and statistical evidences. Third, in order to provide an alternative way for handling inconsistency in federated DL-LiteA knowledge bases we propose an automated approach for assessing adequate trust values (i.e., probabilities) at different levels of granularity by leveraging probabilistic inference over a graphical model. In the last part of this thesis, we evaluate the previously developed algorithms against a set of large distributed LOD sources. In the course of discussing the experimental results, it turns out that the proposed approaches are sufficient, efficient and scalable with respect to real-world scenarios. Moreover, due to the exploitation of the federated structure in our algorithms it further becomes apparent that the number of identified wrong statements, the quality of the generated repair as well as the fineness of the assessed trust values profit from an increasing number of integrated sources

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas

OPTIMIZATION OF NONSTANDARD REASONING SERVICES

The increasing adoption of semantic technologies and the corresponding increasing complexity of application requirements are motivating extensions to the standard reasoning paradigms and services supported by such technologies. This thesis focuses on two of such extensions: nonmonotonic reasoning and inference-proof access control. Expressing knowledge via general rules that admit exceptions is an approach that has been commonly adopted for centuries in areas such as law and science, and more recently in object-oriented programming and computer security. The experiences in developing complex biomedical knowledge bases reported in the literature show that a direct support to defeasible properties and exceptions would be of great help. On the other hand, there is ample evidence of the need for knowledge confidentiality measures. Ontology languages and Linked Open Data are increasingly being used to encode the private knowledge of companies and public organizations. Semantic Web techniques facilitate merging different sources of knowledge and extract implicit information, thereby putting at risk security and the privacy of individuals. But the same reasoning capabilities can be exploited to protect the confidentiality of knowledge. Both nonmonotonic inference and secure knowledge base access rely on nonstandard reasoning procedures. The design and realization of these algorithms in a scalable way (appropriate to the ever-increasing size of ontologies and knowledge bases) is carried out by means of a diversified range of optimization techniques such as appropriate module extraction and incremental reasoning. Extensive experimental evaluation shows the efficiency of the developed optimization techniques: (i) for the first time performance compatible with real-time reasoning is obtained for large nonmonotonic ontologies, while (ii) the secure ontology access control proves to be already compatible with practical use in the e-health application scenario.

Calibración de un algoritmo de detección de anomalías marítimas basado en la fusión de datos satelitales

La fusión de diferentes fuentes de datos aporta una ayuda significativa en el proceso de toma de decisiones. El presente artículo describe el desarrollo de una plataforma que permite detectar anomalías marítimas por medio de la fusión de datos del Sistema de Información Automática (AIS) para seguimiento de buques y de imágenes satelitales de Radares de Apertura Sintética (SAR). Estas anomalías son presentadas al operador como un conjunto de detecciones que requieren ser monitoreadas para descubrir su naturaleza. El proceso de detección se lleva adelante primero identificando objetos dentro de las imágenes SAR a través de la aplicación de algoritmos CFAR, y luego correlacionando los objetos detectados con los datos reportados mediante el sistema AIS. En este trabajo reportamos las pruebas realizadas con diferentes configuraciones de los parámetros para los algoritmos de detección y asociación, analizamos la respuesta de la plataforma y reportamos la combinación de parámetros que reporta mejores resultados para las imágenes utilizadas. Este es un primer paso en nuestro objetivo futuro de desarrollar un sistema que ajuste los parámetros en forma dinámica dependiendo de las imágenes disponibles.XVI Workshop Computación Gráfica, Imágenes y Visualización (WCGIV)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI