93 research outputs found

    Starlink receiver prototyping for opportunistic positioning

    Get PDF
    openTraditional GNSS systems for positioning (PNT), such as GPS and Galileo, use Medium Earth Orbits (MEO). Recently, the possibility to use Low Earth Orbit (LEO) orbits for PNT has been investigated, which offer several advantages over the traditional MEO, e.g., higher power and wider band. Among the available signals of opportunity (SOOPs), this thesis project investigates the feasibility of utilizing Starlink signals, primarily designed for global Internet coverage, for positioning purposes. The Starlink signal structure is not publicly available, but the literature suggests the presence of nine equidistant spectral peaks within a band of approximately 1 MHz in the signal spectrum of each satellite, centered at frequency 11,325 GHz. The method proposed in this thesis involves the acquisition and tracking of these peaks, on a signal sampled at a lower frequency than the estimated bandwidth for the entire Starlink channel of 240 MHz, in order to reduce receiver complexity. For the acquisition phase, once the IQ components have been extracted from the signal, the optimal acquisition window length is selected as the trade-off between noise and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) computational performance. The peak detection threshold is chosen based on the Gaussian distribution of noise and a predefined false alarm probability. This enables the selection of peaks above the noise floor in each acquisition instance, facilitating the detection of potential satellites. Then, similar to standard GNSS receivers, a tracking loop (a third-order PLL assisted by a second-order FLL) is implemented to estimate the Doppler frequency shift of the peaks over the entire captured window. However, as opposed to standard GNSS signals, Starlink does not use a PRN code to identify the individual satellites. To resolve the ambiguity in satellite identification, a method is proposed to compare the Doppler frequency shifts estimated from peak tracking with the Doppler frequency shifts predicted by a visibility prediction tool, which provides the ability to associate each identified peak with a specific Starlink satellite. The tool uses Two-Line Element Sets (TLEs) data and a simplified perturbation model (SGP4) to propagate the satellite orbits. The method is applied to a signal captured using a basic configuration with a Ku-band Low Noise Block (LNB) converter, and the data acquired consist of raw In-phase and Quadrature-phase (IQ) samples with a bandwidth of 4,096 MHz around 11,325 GHz. The results show that the method allows to acquire several satellites in the captured signal, and to track the corresponding peaks for positioning purposes

    Centralized dynamics multi‐frequency GNSS carrier synchronization

    Get PDF
    In this article, we propose a new centralized multi‐frequency carrier tracking architecture using an adaptive Kalman filter to enhance the loop sensitivity and reliability of individual signal tracking in challenging signal environments. The main task of the centralized dynamics‐tracking filter is to effectively blend multiple frequency carrier phase observations in order to estimate the common geometric Doppler frequency of multiple‐frequency received signals. Conventionally, multi‐frequency signals are tracked independently with a fixed‐loop noise bandwidth tracking approach, which is suboptimal in time‐varying signal environments. A suitable collaboration in multiple‐frequency signal tracking using a centralized dynamics‐tracking loop enables robust carrier tracking even if some of the frequency channels are affected by ionospheric scintillation, carrier‐phase multipath, or interference. Additionally, computational efficiency of the multiple‐frequency tracking improves by using the proposed tracking loop architecture. Performance of the proposed multi‐frequency tracking‐loop architecture is verified with experiments using live multi‐frequency satellite signals collected from GPS Block‐IIF satellites under the influence of frequency‐selective interference signals
    corecore