Control of feedback for assistive listening devices

Acoustic feedback refers to the undesired acoustic coupling between the loudspeaker and microphone in hearing aids. This feedback channel poses limitations to the normal operation of hearing aids under varying acoustic scenarios. This work makes contributions to improve the performance of adaptive feedback cancellation techniques and speech quality in hearing aids. For this purpose a two microphone approach is proposed and analysed; and probe signal injection methods are also investigated and improved upon

Howling and Entrainment in Hearing Aids: A Review

This review focuses on howling and entrainment artifacts in digital hearing aids. The howling may occur (especially at high gains), essentially due to the close proximity of the input microphone and the output loudspeaker. The entrainment, on the other hand, occurs when the input to the hearing aids is periodic, for example, music signals or alarm signals with strong tonal characteristics. We give details on methods for howling avoidance, which are mainly based on adaptive filtering-based acoustic feedback cancellation. We also give an overview of many recent works on entrainment in hearing aids. Finally, we remark that efficient acoustic feedback cancellation scheme which can avoid howling, can also well manage the entrainment artifact

Feedback cancellation with probe shaping compensation

Adaptive feedback cancellation methods may integrate the use of probe signals to assist with the biased optimal solution in acoustic systems working in closed-loop. However, injecting a probe noise in the loudspeaker decreases the signal quality perceived by users of assistive listening devices. To counter this, probe signals are usually shaped to provide some level of perceptual masking. In this letter we show the impact of using a shaping filter on the system behavior in terms of convergence rate and steady state error. From this study, it can be concluded that shaping the probe signal may have detrimental influence in terms of system performance. Accordingly, we propose to use the unshaped probe signal combined with an inverse filter of the shaping filter to identify the feedback channel. This restructure of the problem restores convergence rate of LMS type algorithms. Furthermore, we also show that an adequate forward path delay is required to obtain an unbiased solution and that the suggested scheme reduces this delay

New Insights into Optimal Acoustic Feedback Cancellation

In this letter, we present new insights into the bias problem for acoustic feedback cancellation when a probe signal approach is used. The optimum solution of the feedback canceler is not the feedback path but the product of the feedback path and the sensitivity function and hence, the solution is biased. The novelty of this paper also consists of the derivation of the conditions for unbiased feedback cancellation when a probe signal is used as input to the canceler. An adequate delay in the forward path is necessary to reduce, or remove the bias term. The theoretical analysis is verified with simulation results

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationHearing aids suffer from the problem of acoustic feedback that limits the gain provided by hearing aids. Moreover, the output sound quality of hearing aids may be compromised in the presence of background acoustic noise. Digital hearing aids use advanced signal processing to reduce acoustic feedback and background noise to improve the output sound quality. However, it is known that the output sound quality of digital hearing aids deteriorates as the hearing aid gain is increased. Furthermore, popular subband or transform domain digital signal processing in modern hearing aids introduces analysis-synthesis delays in the forward path. Long forward-path delays are not desirable because the processed sound combines with the unprocessed sound that arrives at the cochlea through the vent and changes the sound quality. In this dissertation, we employ a variable, frequency-dependent gain function that is lower at frequencies of the incoming signal where the information is perceptually insignificant. In addition, the method of this dissertation automatically identifies and suppresses residual acoustical feedback components at frequencies that have the potential to drive the system to instability. The suppressed frequency components are monitored and the suppression is removed when such frequencies no longer pose a threat to drive the hearing aid system into instability. Together, the method of this dissertation provides more stable gain over traditional methods by reducing acoustical coupling between the microphone and the loudspeaker of a hearing aid. In addition, the method of this dissertation performs necessary hearing aid signal processing with low-delay characteristics. The central idea for the low-delay hearing aid signal processing is a spectral gain shaping method (SGSM) that employs parallel parametric equalization (EQ) filters. Parameters of the parametric EQ filters and associated gain values are selected using a least-squares approach to obtain the desired spectral response. Finally, the method of this dissertation switches to a least-squares adaptation scheme with linear complexity at the onset of howling. The method adapts to the altered feedback path quickly and allows the patient to not lose perceivable information. The complexity of the least-squares estimate is reduced by reformulating the least-squares estimate into a Toeplitz system and solving it with a direct Toeplitz solver. The increase in stable gain over traditional methods and the output sound quality were evaluated with psychoacoustic experiments on normal-hearing listeners with speech and music signals. The results indicate that the method of this dissertation provides 8 to 12 dB more hearing aid gain than feedback cancelers with traditional fixed gain functions. Furthermore, experimental results obtained with real world hearing aid gain profiles indicate that the method of this dissertation provides less distortion in the output sound quality than classical feedback cancelers, enabling the use of more comfortable style hearing aids for patients with moderate to profound hearing loss. Extensive MATLAB simulations and subjective evaluations of the results indicate that the method of this dissertation exhibits much smaller forward-path delays with superior howling suppression capability

Mean square performance evaluation in frequency domain for an improved adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids

We consider an adaptive linear prediction based feedback canceller for hearing aids that exploits two (an external and a shaped) noise signals for a bias-less adaptive estimation. In particular, the bias in the estimate of the feedback path is reduced by synthesizing the high-frequency spectrum of the reinforced signal using a shaped noise signal. Moreover, a second shaped (probe) noise signal is used to reduce the closed-loop signal correlation between the acoustic input and the loudspeaker signal at low frequencies. A power-transfer-function analysis of the system is provided, from which the effect of the system parameters and adaptive algorithms [normalized least mean square (NLMS) and recursive least square (RLS)] on the rate of convergence, the steady-state behaviour and the stability of the feedback canceller is explicitly found. The derived expressions are verified through computer simulations. It is found that, as compared to feedback canceller without probe noise, the cost of achieving an unbiased estimate of the feedback path using the feedback canceller with probe noise is a higher steady-state misadjustment for the RLS algorithm, whereas a slower convergence and a higher tracking error for the NLMS algorithm