177 research outputs found

    Rainbow Coloring Hardness via Low Sensitivity Polymorphisms

    Get PDF
    A k-uniform hypergraph is said to be r-rainbow colorable if there is an r-coloring of its vertices such that every hyperedge intersects all r color classes. Given as input such a hypergraph, finding a r-rainbow coloring of it is NP-hard for all k >= 3 and r >= 2. Therefore, one settles for finding a rainbow coloring with fewer colors (which is an easier task). When r=k (the maximum possible value), i.e., the hypergraph is k-partite, one can efficiently 2-rainbow color the hypergraph, i.e., 2-color its vertices so that there are no monochromatic edges. In this work we consider the next smaller value of r=k-1, and prove that in this case it is NP-hard to rainbow color the hypergraph with q := ceil[(k-2)/2] colors. In particular, for k <=6, it is NP-hard to 2-color (k-1)-rainbow colorable k-uniform hypergraphs. Our proof follows the algebraic approach to promise constraint satisfaction problems. It proceeds by characterizing the polymorphisms associated with the approximate rainbow coloring problem, which are rainbow colorings of some product hypergraphs on vertex set [r]^n. We prove that any such polymorphism f: [r]^n -> [q] must be C-fixing, i.e., there is a small subset S of C coordinates and a setting a in [q]^S such that fixing x_{|S} = a determines the value of f(x). The key step in our proof is bounding the sensitivity of certain rainbow colorings, thereby arguing that they must be juntas. Armed with the C-fixing characterization, our NP-hardness is obtained via a reduction from smooth Label Cover

    Color-blind index in graphs of very low degree

    Get PDF
    Let c:E(G)[k]c:E(G)\to [k] be an edge-coloring of a graph GG, not necessarily proper. For each vertex vv, let cˉ(v)=(a1,,ak)\bar{c}(v)=(a_1,\ldots,a_k), where aia_i is the number of edges incident to vv with color ii. Reorder cˉ(v)\bar{c}(v) for every vv in GG in nonincreasing order to obtain c(v)c^*(v), the color-blind partition of vv. When cc^* induces a proper vertex coloring, that is, c(u)c(v)c^*(u)\neq c^*(v) for every edge uvuv in GG, we say that cc is color-blind distinguishing. The minimum kk for which there exists a color-blind distinguishing edge coloring c:E(G)[k]c:E(G)\to [k] is the color-blind index of GG, denoted dal(G)\operatorname{dal}(G). We demonstrate that determining the color-blind index is more subtle than previously thought. In particular, determining if dal(G)2\operatorname{dal}(G) \leq 2 is NP-complete. We also connect the color-blind index of a regular bipartite graph to 2-colorable regular hypergraphs and characterize when dal(G)\operatorname{dal}(G) is finite for a class of 3-regular graphs.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figures, and a 4 page appendi

    Approximate Hypergraph Coloring under Low-discrepancy and Related Promises

    Get PDF
    A hypergraph is said to be χ\chi-colorable if its vertices can be colored with χ\chi colors so that no hyperedge is monochromatic. 22-colorability is a fundamental property (called Property B) of hypergraphs and is extensively studied in combinatorics. Algorithmically, however, given a 22-colorable kk-uniform hypergraph, it is NP-hard to find a 22-coloring miscoloring fewer than a fraction 2k+12^{-k+1} of hyperedges (which is achieved by a random 22-coloring), and the best algorithms to color the hypergraph properly require n11/k\approx n^{1-1/k} colors, approaching the trivial bound of nn as kk increases. In this work, we study the complexity of approximate hypergraph coloring, for both the maximization (finding a 22-coloring with fewest miscolored edges) and minimization (finding a proper coloring using fewest number of colors) versions, when the input hypergraph is promised to have the following stronger properties than 22-colorability: (A) Low-discrepancy: If the hypergraph has discrepancy k\ell \ll \sqrt{k}, we give an algorithm to color the it with nO(2/k)\approx n^{O(\ell^2/k)} colors. However, for the maximization version, we prove NP-hardness of finding a 22-coloring miscoloring a smaller than 2O(k)2^{-O(k)} (resp. kO(k)k^{-O(k)}) fraction of the hyperedges when =O(logk)\ell = O(\log k) (resp. =2\ell=2). Assuming the UGC, we improve the latter hardness factor to 2O(k)2^{-O(k)} for almost discrepancy-11 hypergraphs. (B) Rainbow colorability: If the hypergraph has a (k)(k-\ell)-coloring such that each hyperedge is polychromatic with all these colors, we give a 22-coloring algorithm that miscolors at most kΩ(k)k^{-\Omega(k)} of the hyperedges when k\ell \ll \sqrt{k}, and complement this with a matching UG hardness result showing that when =k\ell =\sqrt{k}, it is hard to even beat the 2k+12^{-k+1} bound achieved by a random coloring.Comment: Approx 201

    Ramsey numbers of ordered graphs

    Full text link
    An ordered graph is a pair G=(G,)\mathcal{G}=(G,\prec) where GG is a graph and \prec is a total ordering of its vertices. The ordered Ramsey number R(G)\overline{R}(\mathcal{G}) is the minimum number NN such that every ordered complete graph with NN vertices and with edges colored by two colors contains a monochromatic copy of G\mathcal{G}. In contrast with the case of unordered graphs, we show that there are arbitrarily large ordered matchings Mn\mathcal{M}_n on nn vertices for which R(Mn)\overline{R}(\mathcal{M}_n) is superpolynomial in nn. This implies that ordered Ramsey numbers of the same graph can grow superpolynomially in the size of the graph in one ordering and remain linear in another ordering. We also prove that the ordered Ramsey number R(G)\overline{R}(\mathcal{G}) is polynomial in the number of vertices of G\mathcal{G} if the bandwidth of G\mathcal{G} is constant or if G\mathcal{G} is an ordered graph of constant degeneracy and constant interval chromatic number. The first result gives a positive answer to a question of Conlon, Fox, Lee, and Sudakov. For a few special classes of ordered paths, stars or matchings, we give asymptotically tight bounds on their ordered Ramsey numbers. For so-called monotone cycles we compute their ordered Ramsey numbers exactly. This result implies exact formulas for geometric Ramsey numbers of cycles introduced by K\'arolyi, Pach, T\'oth, and Valtr.Comment: 29 pages, 13 figures, to appear in Electronic Journal of Combinatoric
    corecore