38,994 research outputs found
Detection and resolution of normative conflicts in multi-agent systems : a literature survey
Peer reviewedPostprin
A CNL for Contract-Oriented Diagrams
We present a first step towards a framework for defining and manipulating
normative documents or contracts described as Contract-Oriented (C-O) Diagrams.
These diagrams provide a visual representation for such texts, giving the
possibility to express a signatory's obligations, permissions and prohibitions,
with or without timing constraints, as well as the penalties resulting from the
non-fulfilment of a contract. This work presents a CNL for verbalising C-O
Diagrams, a web-based tool allowing editing in this CNL, and another for
visualising and manipulating the diagrams interactively. We then show how these
proof-of-concept tools can be used by applying them to a small example
The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge From Global Legal Pluralism
Should choice of law norms ever designate non-state norms as applicable law? The question is not new of course, although it is seldom discussed systematically. Yet the question moves from the periphery to the center once we view conflict of laws through the lens of globalization. If, through the lens of globalization, states and non-state communities both create norms, this should pose a challenges to conflict of laws rules that traditionally only designates state norms as applicable law. Somewhat surprisingly, conflict of laws and global legal pluralism rarely meet, so far, in analyses This paper does not set out its own theory of conflict of laws for global legal pluralism. Instead, its goal is more modest: to attain conceptual clarity about the encounter of pluralism and conflict of laws that would make such a theory possible. To this end I ask four questions: First, what is global legal pluralism, and to what extent can the normative orders created by non-state communities be considered as law from a theoretical standpoint? (II)Second, how does state law, including conflict of laws, currently deal with non-state normative order? I will show that the rejection of non-state law by traditional conflict of laws doctrine must be understood in combination with the other methods the state uses to account for non-state normative orders which I call incorporation, deference, and delegation. The combination shows that the state does acknowledge non-state normative orders, but it does not acknowledge them as law. (III) This leads to the third question, namely why the state acknowledges the laws of foreign states as law while denying this status to non-state normative orders. The reason is that the state would otherwise undermine its own position: while treating foreign state law as law strengthens its position, treating non-state law as such would weaken it. (IV) Of course, such weakening of the state need not be a bad thing, and the fourth question therefore asks what a more inclusive approach to conflict of laws, recognizing non-state normative orders as law, would require and imply. This fourth question cannot be answered in full here, but I try to show that such a reconceptualization of the state would be more far-reaching, and potentially less attractive, than proponents of legal pluralism may wish for (V.). I conclude with a cautionary note: the relation between global legal pluralism and conflict of laws is more complex, and may necessitate more radical rethinking of traditional ideas, than one might thin
Internet Governance: the State of Play
The Global Forum on Internet Governance held by the UNICT Task Force in New York on 25-26 March concluded that Internet governance issues were many and complex. The Secretary-General's Working Group on Internet Governance will have to map out and navigate this complex terrain as it makes recommendations to the World Summit on an Information Society in 2005. To assist in this process, the Forum recommended, in the words of the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations at the closing session, that a matrix be developed "of all issues of Internet governance addressed by multilateral institutions, including gaps and concerns, to assist the Secretary-General in moving forward the agenda on these issues." This paper takes up the Deputy Secretary-General's challenge. It is an analysis of the state of play in Internet governance in different forums, with a view to showing: (1) what issues are being addressed (2) by whom, (3) what are the types of consideration that these issues receive and (4) what issues are not adequately addressed
The Fair Value of Minority Stock in Closely Held Corporations
In this Article, Professor Shishido examines the various methods—those used by the courts as well as those suggested by law and economics scholars—for determining the fair value of minority stock in closely held corporations. In Professor Shishido\u27s view, the courts\u27 method of weighing—the so-called Delaware block method—fails to arrive at the true value of the minority\u27s shares and often undervalues their worth. Professor Shishido also argues that law and economics scholars fail to differentiate between closely held corporations and publicly held corporations, thus failing to include the effect of corporate law on the fair value of closely held corporate stock
Societal constitutionalism : alternatives to state-centred constitutional theory
Englische Fassung: Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional theory? ("Storrs Lectures 2003/04" Yale Law School) In: Christian Joerges, Inge-Johanne Sand und Gunther Teubner (Hg.) Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance. Hart, Oxford 2004, 3-28. Und in: Ius et Lex 2004, S.31-50. Französische Fassung: Constitutionalisme sociĂ©tal et globalisation: Alternatives Ă la thĂ©orie constitutionelle centrĂ©e sur l'État. Themis 2005 (im Erscheinen) Italienische Fassung: Costituzionalismo societario: alternative alla teoria costituzionale stato-centrica. In: Gunther Teubner, Costituzionalismo societario. Armando, Roma 2005 (im Erscheinen). Spanische Fassung: GlobalizaciĂłn y constitucionalismo social: alternativas a la teorĂa constitucionalista centrada en el Estado". In: Carlos GĂłmez-Jara DĂez (Hg.), TeorĂa de sistemas y Derecho penal: Fundamentos y posibilidades de aplicaciĂłn. Granada: Comares, 2005 (im Erscheinen) und in: Cancio Meliá und Bacigalupo Saggese (Hg.) Derecho penal y polĂtica transnacional. Barcelona: Atelier, 2005 (in Erscheinen)und in: Gunther Teubner, El Derecho como sistema autopoiĂ©tico de la sociedad global, herausgegeben von Carlos GĂłmez-Jara Diez. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2005 (im Erscheinen) und Lima: ARA Editores, 2005 (im Erscheinen) Polnische Fassung: Konstytucjonalizm spoleczny: Alternatywy dla teorii konstitucyjnej nakierowanej na panstwo. Ius et Lex 3, 2004, S.5-27
Industrial Symbiotic Networks as Coordinated Games
We present an approach for implementing a specific form of collaborative
industrial practices-called Industrial Symbiotic Networks (ISNs)-as MC-Net
cooperative games and address the so called ISN implementation problem. This
is, the characteristics of ISNs may lead to inapplicability of fair and stable
benefit allocation methods even if the collaboration is a collectively desired
one. Inspired by realistic ISN scenarios and the literature on normative
multi-agent systems, we consider regulations and normative socioeconomic
policies as two elements that in combination with ISN games resolve the
situation and result in the concept of coordinated ISNs.Comment: 3 pages, Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous
Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2018
- …