1,583 research outputs found
Synthesizing Modular Invariants for Synchronous Code
In this paper, we explore different techniques to synthesize modular
invariants for synchronous code encoded as Horn clauses. Modular invariants are
a set of formulas that characterizes the validity of predicates. They are very
useful for different aspects of analysis, synthesis, testing and program
transformation. We describe two techniques to generate modular invariants for
code written in the synchronous dataflow language Lustre. The first technique
directly encodes the synchronous code in a modular fashion. While in the second
technique, we synthesize modular invariants starting from a monolithic
invariant. Both techniques, take advantage of analysis techniques based on
property-directed reachability. We also describe a technique to minimize the
synthesized invariants.Comment: In Proceedings HCVS 2014, arXiv:1412.082
Hypertableau Reasoning for Description Logics
We present a novel reasoning calculus for the description logic SHOIQ^+---a
knowledge representation formalism with applications in areas such as the
Semantic Web. Unnecessary nondeterminism and the construction of large models
are two primary sources of inefficiency in the tableau-based reasoning calculi
used in state-of-the-art reasoners. In order to reduce nondeterminism, we base
our calculus on hypertableau and hyperresolution calculi, which we extend with
a blocking condition to ensure termination. In order to reduce the size of the
constructed models, we introduce anywhere pairwise blocking. We also present an
improved nominal introduction rule that ensures termination in the presence of
nominals, inverse roles, and number restrictions---a combination of DL
constructs that has proven notoriously difficult to handle. Our implementation
shows significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art reasoners on
several well-known ontologies
Collection analysis for Horn clause programs
We consider approximating data structures with collections of the items that
they contain. For examples, lists, binary trees, tuples, etc, can be
approximated by sets or multisets of the items within them. Such approximations
can be used to provide partial correctness properties of logic programs. For
example, one might wish to specify than whenever the atom is proved
then the two lists and contain the same multiset of items (that is,
is a permutation of ). If sorting removes duplicates, then one would like to
infer that the sets of items underlying and are the same. Such results
could be useful to have if they can be determined statically and automatically.
We present a scheme by which such collection analysis can be structured and
automated. Central to this scheme is the use of linear logic as a omputational
logic underlying the logic of Horn clauses
MaLeS: A Framework for Automatic Tuning of Automated Theorem Provers
MaLeS is an automatic tuning framework for automated theorem provers. It
provides solutions for both the strategy finding as well as the strategy
scheduling problem. This paper describes the tool and the methods used in it,
and evaluates its performance on three automated theorem provers: E, LEO-II and
Satallax. An evaluation on a subset of the TPTP library problems shows that on
average a MaLeS-tuned prover solves 8.67% more problems than the prover with
its default settings
Decidability of the Monadic Shallow Linear First-Order Fragment with Straight Dismatching Constraints
The monadic shallow linear Horn fragment is well-known to be decidable and
has many application, e.g., in security protocol analysis, tree automata, or
abstraction refinement. It was a long standing open problem how to extend the
fragment to the non-Horn case, preserving decidability, that would, e.g.,
enable to express non-determinism in protocols. We prove decidability of the
non-Horn monadic shallow linear fragment via ordered resolution further
extended with dismatching constraints and discuss some applications of the new
decidable fragment.Comment: 29 pages, long version of CADE-26 pape
- …