19 research outputs found
Boundary graph grammars with dynamic edge relabeling
AbstractMost NLC-like graph grammars generate node-labeled graphs. As one of the exceptions, eNCE graph grammars generate graphs with edge labels as well. We investigate this type of graph grammar and show that the use of edge labels (together with the NCE feature) is responsible for some new properties. Especially boundary eNCE (B-eNCE) grammars are considered. First, although eNCE grammars have the context-sensitive feature of “blocking edges,” we show that B-eNCE grammars do not. Second, we show the existence of a Chomsky normal form and a Greibach normal form for B-eNCE grammars. Third, the boundary eNCE languages are characterized in terms of regular tree and string languages. Fourth, we prove that the class of (boundary) eNCE languages properly contains the closure of the class of (boundary) NLC languages under node relabelings. Analogous results are shown for linear eNCE grammars
Symbol–Relation Grammars: A Formalism for Graphical Languages
AbstractA common approach to the formal description of pictorial and visual languages makes use of formal grammars and rewriting mechanisms. The present paper is concerned with the formalism of Symbol–Relation Grammars (SR grammars, for short). Each sentence in an SR language is composed of a set of symbol occurrences representing visual elementary objects, which are related through a set of binary relational items. The main feature of SR grammars is the uniform way they use context-free productions to rewrite symbol occurrences as well as relation items. The clearness and uniformity of the derivation process for SR grammars allow the extension of well-established techniques of syntactic and semantic analysis to the case of SR grammars. The paper provides an accurate analysis of the derivation mechanism and the expressive power of the SR formalism. This is necessary to fully exploit the capabilities of the model. The most meaningful features of SR grammars as well as their generative power are compared with those of well-known graph grammar families. In spite of their structural simplicity, variations of SR grammars have a generative power comparable with that of expressive classes of graph grammars, such as the edNCE and the N-edNCE classes
Double Greibach operator grammars
AbstractEvery context-free grammar can be transformed into one in double Greibach operator form, that satisfies both double Greibach form and operator form. Examination of the expressive power of various well-known subclasses of context-free grammars in double Greibach and/or operator form yields an extended hierarchy of language classes. Basic decision properties such as equivalence can be stated in stronger forms via new classes of languages in this hierarchy
Defining Models - Meta Models versus Graph Grammars
The precise specification of software models is a major concern in model-driven design of object-oriented software. Metamodelling and graph grammars are apparent choices for such specifications. Metamodelling has several advantages: it is easy to use, and provides procedures that check automatically whether a model is valid or not. However, it is less suited for proving properties of models, or for generating large sets of example models. Graph grammars, in contrast, offer a natural procedure - the derivation process - for generating example models, and they support proofs because they define a graph language inductively. However, not all graph grammars that allow to specify practically relevant models are easily parseable. In this paper, we propose contextual star grammars as a graph grammar approach that allows for simple parsing and that is powerful enough for specifying non-trivial software models. This is demonstrated by defining program graphs, a language-independent model of object-oriented programs, with a focus on shape (static structure) rather than behavior
On the membership problem for regular DNLC grammars
AbstractThere are (at least) three motivations to study the class of regular directed node-label controlled graph grammars (regular DNLC grammars for shor): (1) it fits very well into the hierarchy of subclasses of DNLC grammars, (2) it generalizes naturally right-linear string grammars and (3) it provides a useful framework for the theory of concurrent systems based on the theory of traces.The complexity of (the membership problem for) the class of regular DNLC grammars is investigated
Equational reasoning with context-free families of string diagrams
String diagrams provide an intuitive language for expressing networks of
interacting processes graphically. A discrete representation of string
diagrams, called string graphs, allows for mechanised equational reasoning by
double-pushout rewriting. However, one often wishes to express not just single
equations, but entire families of equations between diagrams of arbitrary size.
To do this we define a class of context-free grammars, called B-ESG grammars,
that are suitable for defining entire families of string graphs, and crucially,
of string graph rewrite rules. We show that the language-membership and
match-enumeration problems are decidable for these grammars, and hence that
there is an algorithm for rewriting string graphs according to B-ESG rewrite
patterns. We also show that it is possible to reason at the level of grammars
by providing a simple method for transforming a grammar by string graph
rewriting, and showing admissibility of the induced B-ESG rewrite pattern.Comment: International Conference on Graph Transformation, ICGT 2015. The
final publication is available at Springer via
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21145-9_
Multiple Context-Free Tree Grammars: Lexicalization and Characterization
Multiple (simple) context-free tree grammars are investigated, where "simple"
means "linear and nondeleting". Every multiple context-free tree grammar that
is finitely ambiguous can be lexicalized; i.e., it can be transformed into an
equivalent one (generating the same tree language) in which each rule of the
grammar contains a lexical symbol. Due to this transformation, the rank of the
nonterminals increases at most by 1, and the multiplicity (or fan-out) of the
grammar increases at most by the maximal rank of the lexical symbols; in
particular, the multiplicity does not increase when all lexical symbols have
rank 0. Multiple context-free tree grammars have the same tree generating power
as multi-component tree adjoining grammars (provided the latter can use a
root-marker). Moreover, every multi-component tree adjoining grammar that is
finitely ambiguous can be lexicalized. Multiple context-free tree grammars have
the same string generating power as multiple context-free (string) grammars and
polynomial time parsing algorithms. A tree language can be generated by a
multiple context-free tree grammar if and only if it is the image of a regular
tree language under a deterministic finite-copying macro tree transducer.
Multiple context-free tree grammars can be used as a synchronous translation
device.Comment: 78 pages, 13 figure