Model counting for reactive systems

Model counting is the problem of computing the number of solutions for a logical formula. In the last few years, it has been primarily studied for propositional logic, and has been shown to be useful in many applications. In planning, for example, propositional model counting has been used to compute the robustness of a plan in an incomplete domain. In information-flow control, model counting has been applied to measure the amount of information leaked by a security-critical system. In this thesis, we introduce the model counting problem for linear-time properties, and show its applications in formal verification. In the same way propositional model counting generalizes the satisfiability problem for propositional logic, counting models for linear-time properties generalizes the emptiness problem for languages over infinite words to one that asks for the number of words in a language. The model counting problem, thus, provides a foundation for quantitative extensions of model checking, where not only the existence of computations that violate the specification is determined, but also the number of such violations. We solve the model counting problem for the prominent class of omega-regular properties. We present algorithms for solving the problem for different classes of properties, and show the advantages of our algorithms in comparison to indirect approaches based on encodings into propositional logic. We further show how model counting can be used for solving a variety of quantitative problems in formal verification, including probabilistic model checking, quantitative information-flow in security-critical systems, and the synthesis of approximate implementations for reactive systems.Das Modellzählproblem fragt nach der Anzahl der Lösungen einer logischen Formel, und wurde in den letzten Jahren hauptsächlich für Aussagenlogik untersucht. Das Zählen von Modellen aussagenlogischer Formeln hat sich in vielen Anwendungen als nützlich erwiesen. Im Bereich der künstlichen Intelligenz wurde das Zählen von Modellen beispielsweise verwendet, um die Robustheit eines Plans in einem unvollständigen Weltmodell zu bewerten. Das Zählen von Modellen kann auch verwendet werden, um in sicherheitskritischen Systemen die Menge an enthüllten vertraulichen Daten zu messen. Diese Dissertation stellt das Modellzählproblem für Linearzeiteigenschaften vor, und untersucht dessen Rolle in der Welt der formalen Verifikation. Das Zählen von Modellen für Linearzeiteigenschaften führt zu neuen quantitativen Erweiterungen klassischer Verifikationsprobleme, bei denen nicht nur die Existenz eines Fehlers in einem System zu überprüfen ist, sondern auch die Anzahl solcher Fehler. Wir präsentieren Algorithmen zur Lösung des Modellzählproblems für verschiedene Klassen von Linearzeiteigenschaften und zeigen die Vorteile unserer Algorithmen im Vergleich zu indirekten Ansätzen, die auf Kodierungen der untersuchten Probleme in Aussagenlogik basieren. Darüberhinaus zeigen wir wie das Zählen von Modellen zur Lösung einer Vielzahl quantitativer Probleme in der formalen Verifikation verwendet werden kann. Dies beinhaltet unter anderem die Analyse probabilistischer Modelle, die Kontrolle quantitativen Informationsflusses in sicherheitskritischen Systemen, und die Synthese von approximativen Implementierungen für reaktive Systeme

Secure Information Flow via Stripping and Fast Simulation

Type systems for secure information flow aim to prevent a program from leaking information from H (high) to L (low) variables. Traditionally, bisimulation has been the prevalent technique for proving the soundness of such systems. This work intro- duces a new proof technique based on stripping and fast simulation, and shows that it can be applied in a number of cases where bisimulation fails. We present a progressive development of this technique over a representative sample of languages includ- ing a simple imperative language (core theory), a multiprocessing nondeterministic language, a probabilistic language, and a language with cryptographic primitives. In the core theory we illustrate the key concepts of this technique in a basic setting. A fast low simulation in the context of transition systems is a binary relation where simulating states can match the moves of simulated states while maintaining the equivalence of low variables; stripping is a function that removes high commands from programs. We show that we can prove secure information flow by arguing that the stripping relation is a fast low simulation. We then extend the core theory to an abstract distributed language under a nondeterministic scheduler. Next, we extend to a probabilistic language with a random assignment command; we generalize fast simulation to the setting of discrete time Markov Chains, and prove approximate probabilistic noninterference. Finally, we introduce cryptographic primitives into the probabilistic language and prove computational noninterference, provided that the underling encryption scheme is secure

LIPIcs

Synchronous programs are easy to specify because the side effects of an operation are finished by the time the invocation of the operation returns to the caller. Asynchronous programs, on the other hand, are difficult to specify because there are side effects due to pending computation scheduled as a result of the invocation of an operation. They are also difficult to verify because of the large number of possible interleavings of concurrent computation threads. We present synchronization, a new proof rule that simplifies the verification of asynchronous programs by introducing the fiction, for proof purposes, that asynchronous operations complete synchronously. Synchronization summarizes an asynchronous computation as immediate atomic effect. Modular verification is enabled via pending asynchronous calls in atomic summaries, and a complementary proof rule that eliminates pending asynchronous calls when components and their specifications are composed. We evaluate synchronization in the context of a multi-layer refinement verification methodology on a collection of benchmark programs

On Compositional Information Flow Aware Refinement

The concepts of information flow security and refinement are known to have had a troubled relationship ever since the seminal work of McLean. In this work we study refinements that support changes in data representation and semantics, including the addition of state variables that may induce new observational power or side channels. We propose a new epistemic approach to ignorance-preserving refinement where an abstract model is used as a specification of a system’s permitted information flows, that may include the declassification of secret information. The core idea is to require that refinement steps must not induce observer knowledge that is not already available in the abstract model. Our study is set in the context of a class of shared variable multi-agent models similar to interpreted systems in epistemic logic. We demonstrate the expressiveness of our framework through a series of small examples and compare our approach to existing, stricter notions of information-flow secure refinement based on bisimulations and noninterference preservation. Interestingly, noninterference preservation is not supported “out of the box” in our setting, because refinement steps may introduce new secrets that are independent of secrets already present at abstract level. To support verification, we first introduce a “cube-shaped” unwinding condition related to conditions recently studied in the context of value-dependent noninterference, kernel verification, and secure compilation. A fundamental problem with ignorance-preserving refinement, caused by the support for general data and observation refinement, is that sequential composability is lost. We propose a solution based on relational pre- and post-conditions and illustrate its use together with unwinding on the oblivious RAM construction of Chung and Pass