485 research outputs found
Offline and online data: on upgrading functional information to knowledge
This paper addresses the problem of upgrading functional information to knowledge. Functional information is defined as syntactically well-formed, meaningful and collectively opaque data. Its use in the formal epistemology of information theories is crucial to solve the debate on the veridical nature of information, and it represents the companion notion to standard strongly semantic information, defined as well-formed, meaningful and true data. The formal framework, on which the definitions are based, uses a contextual version of the verificationist principle of truth in order to connect functional to semantic information, avoiding Gettierization and decoupling from true informational contents. The upgrade operation from functional information uses the machinery of epistemic modalities in order to add data localization and accessibility as its main properties. We show in this way the conceptual worthiness of this notion for issues in contemporary epistemology debates, such as the explanation of knowledge process acquisition from information retrieval systems, and open data repositories
A Deontic Logic Analysis of Autonomous Systems' Safety
We consider the pressing question of how to model, verify, and ensure that
autonomous systems meet certain \textit{obligations} (like the obligation to
respect traffic laws), and refrain from impermissible behavior (like recklessly
changing lanes). Temporal logics are heavily used in autonomous system design;
however, as we illustrate here, temporal (alethic) logics alone are
inappropriate for reasoning about obligations of autonomous systems. This paper
proposes the use of Dominance Act Utilitarianism (DAU), a deontic logic of
agency, to encode and reason about obligations of autonomous systems. We use
DAU to analyze Intel's Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) proposal as a
real-world case study. We demonstrate that DAU can express well-posed RSS
rules, formally derive undesirable consequences of these rules, illustrate how
DAU could help design systems that have specific obligations, and how to
model-check DAU obligations.Comment: 11 pages, 4 figures, In 23rd ACM International Conference on Hybrid
Systems: Computation and Contro
Impermissible SelfâRationalizing Pessimism:In Defence of a Pragmatic Ethics of Belief
We present an argument against a standard evidentialist position on the ethics of belief. We argue that sometimes a person merits criticism for holding a belief even when that belief is well supported by her evidence in any relevant sense. We show how our argument advances the case for anti-evidentialism (pragmatism) in the light of other arguments presented in the recent literature, and respond to a set of possible evidentialist rejoinders
Misunderstandings about truth
The article explores the most common disagreements and misunderstandings concerning truth, in philosophical as well as extra-philosophical debates, then reflects on the notion of "post-truth era", reverting the diagnosis, and suggesting that in the recent history of the concept of truth we may find some positive opportunities that deserve to be taken into account
Philosophical Issues From Kripke's 'Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic'
In âSemantical Considerations on Modal Logicâ, Kripke articulates his project in the discourse of âpossible worldsâ. There has been much philosophical discussion of whether endorsement of the Kripke semantics brings ontological commitment to possible worlds. However, that discussion is less than satisfactory because it has been conducted without the necessary investigation of the surrounding philosophical issues that are raised by the Kripke semantics. My aim in this paper is to map out the surrounding territory and to commence that investigation. Among the surrounding issues, and my attitudes to them, are these: (1) the potential of the standard distinction between pure and impure versions of the semantic theory has been under-exploited; (2) there has been under-estimation of what is achieved by the pure semantic theory alone; (3) there is a methodological imperative to co-ordinate a clear conception of the purposes of the impure theory with an equally clear conception of the content the theory; (4) there is a need to support by argument claims about how such a semantic theory, even in an impure state, can fund explanations in the theory of meaning and metaphysics; (5) greater attention needs to be paid to the crucial advance that Kripke makes on the precursors of possible-worlds semantics proper (e.g. Carnap 1947) in clearly distinguishing variation across the worlds within a model of modal space from variation across such models and, finally, (6) the normative nature of the concept of applicability, of the pure semantic theory, is both of crucial importance and largely ignored
- âŠ