2,544 research outputs found
Towards a Systematic Account of Different Semantics for Logic Programs
In [Hitzler and Wendt 2002, 2005], a new methodology has been proposed which
allows to derive uniform characterizations of different declarative semantics
for logic programs with negation. One result from this work is that the
well-founded semantics can formally be understood as a stratified version of
the Fitting (or Kripke-Kleene) semantics. The constructions leading to this
result, however, show a certain asymmetry which is not readily understood. We
will study this situation here with the result that we will obtain a coherent
picture of relations between different semantics for normal logic programs.Comment: 20 page
Nonmonotonic Trust Management for P2P Applications
Community decisions about access control in virtual communities are
non-monotonic in nature. This means that they cannot be expressed in current,
monotonic trust management languages such as the family of Role Based Trust
Management languages (RT). To solve this problem we propose RT-, which adds a
restricted form of negation to the standard RT language, thus admitting a
controlled form of non-monotonicity. The semantics of RT- is discussed and
presented in terms of the well-founded semantics for Logic Programs. Finally we
discuss how chain discovery can be accomplished for RT-.Comment: This paper appears in the proceedings of the 1st International
Workshop on Security and Trust Management (STM 2005). To appear in ENTC
A flexible framework for defeasible logics
Logics for knowledge representation suffer from over-specialization: while
each logic may provide an ideal representation formalism for some problems, it
is less than optimal for others. A solution to this problem is to choose from
several logics and, when necessary, combine the representations. In general,
such an approach results in a very difficult problem of combination. However,
if we can choose the logics from a uniform framework then the problem of
combining them is greatly simplified. In this paper, we develop such a
framework for defeasible logics. It supports all defeasible logics that satisfy
a strong negation principle. We use logic meta-programs as the basis for the
framework.Comment: Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning,
April 9-11, 2000, Breckenridge, Colorad
Formal Concept Analysis and Resolution in Algebraic Domains
We relate two formerly independent areas: Formal concept analysis and logic
of domains. We will establish a correspondene between contextual attribute
logic on formal contexts resp. concept lattices and a clausal logic on coherent
algebraic cpos. We show how to identify the notion of formal concept in the
domain theoretic setting. In particular, we show that a special instance of the
resolution rule from the domain logic coincides with the concept closure
operator from formal concept analysis. The results shed light on the use of
contexts and domains for knowledge representation and reasoning purposes.Comment: 14 pages. We have rewritten the old version according to the
suggestions of some referees. The results are the same. The presentation is
completely differen
SAT Modulo Monotonic Theories
We define the concept of a monotonic theory and show how to build efficient
SMT (SAT Modulo Theory) solvers, including effective theory propagation and
clause learning, for such theories. We present examples showing that monotonic
theories arise from many common problems, e.g., graph properties such as
reachability, shortest paths, connected components, minimum spanning tree, and
max-flow/min-cut, and then demonstrate our framework by building SMT solvers
for each of these theories. We apply these solvers to procedural content
generation problems, demonstrating major speed-ups over state-of-the-art
approaches based on SAT or Answer Set Programming, and easily solving several
instances that were previously impractical to solve
Induction of Non-Monotonic Logic Programs to Explain Boosted Tree Models Using LIME
We present a heuristic based algorithm to induce \textit{nonmonotonic} logic
programs that will explain the behavior of XGBoost trained classifiers. We use
the technique based on the LIME approach to locally select the most important
features contributing to the classification decision. Then, in order to explain
the model's global behavior, we propose the LIME-FOLD algorithm ---a
heuristic-based inductive logic programming (ILP) algorithm capable of learning
non-monotonic logic programs---that we apply to a transformed dataset produced
by LIME. Our proposed approach is agnostic to the choice of the ILP algorithm.
Our experiments with UCI standard benchmarks suggest a significant improvement
in terms of classification evaluation metrics. Meanwhile, the number of induced
rules dramatically decreases compared to ALEPH, a state-of-the-art ILP system
- …