349 research outputs found
Non-Malleable Extractors and Codes, with their Many Tampered Extensions
Randomness extractors and error correcting codes are fundamental objects in
computer science. Recently, there have been several natural generalizations of
these objects, in the context and study of tamper resilient cryptography. These
are seeded non-malleable extractors, introduced in [DW09]; seedless
non-malleable extractors, introduced in [CG14b]; and non-malleable codes,
introduced in [DPW10].
However, explicit constructions of non-malleable extractors appear to be
hard, and the known constructions are far behind their non-tampered
counterparts.
In this paper we make progress towards solving the above problems. Our
contributions are as follows.
(1) We construct an explicit seeded non-malleable extractor for min-entropy
. This dramatically improves all previous results and gives a
simpler 2-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss,
matching the best known result in [Li15b].
(2) We construct the first explicit non-malleable two-source extractor for
min-entropy , with output size and
error .
(3) We initiate the study of two natural generalizations of seedless
non-malleable extractors and non-malleable codes, where the sources or the
codeword may be tampered many times. We construct the first explicit
non-malleable two-source extractor with tampering degree up to
, which works for min-entropy , with
output size and error . We show that we can
efficiently sample uniformly from any pre-image. By the connection in [CG14b],
we also obtain the first explicit non-malleable codes with tampering degree
up to , relative rate , and error
.Comment: 50 pages; see paper for full abstrac
Non-malleable coding against bit-wise and split-state tampering
Non-malleable coding, introduced by Dziembowski et al. (ICS 2010), aims for protecting the integrity of information against tampering attacks in situations where error detection is impossible. Intuitively, information encoded by a non-malleable code either decodes to the original message or, in presence of any tampering, to an unrelated message. Non-malleable coding is possible against any class of adversaries of bounded size. In particular, Dziembowski et al. show that such codes exist and may achieve positive rates for any class of tampering functions of size at most (Formula presented.), for any constant (Formula presented.). However, this result is existential and has thus attracted a great deal of subsequent research on explicit constructions of non-malleable codes against natural classes of adversaries. In this work, we consider constructions of coding schemes against two well-studied classes of tampering functions; namely, bit-wise tampering functions (where the adversary tampers each bit of the encoding independently) and the much more general class of split-state adversaries (where two independent adversaries arbitrarily tamper each half of the encoded sequence). We obtain the following results for these models. (1) For bit-tampering adversaries, we obtain explicit and efficiently encodable and decodable non-malleable codes of length n achieving rate (Formula presented.) and error (also known as “exact security”) (Formula presented.). Alternatively, it is possible to improve the error to (Formula presented.) at the cost of making the construction Monte Carlo with success probability (Formula presented.) (while still allowing a compact description of the code). Previously, the best known construction of bit-tampering coding schemes was due to Dziembowski et al. (ICS 2010), which is a Monte Carlo construction achieving rate close to .1887. (2) We initiate the study of seedless non-malleable extractors as a natural variation of the notion of non-malleable extractors introduced by Dodis and Wichs (STOC 2009). We show that construction of non-malleable codes for the split-state model reduces to construction of non-malleable two-source extractors. We prove a general result on existence of seedless non-malleable extractors, which implies that codes obtained from our reduction can achieve rates arbitrarily close to 1 / 5 and exponentially small error. In a separate recent work, the authors show that the optimal rate in this model is 1 / 2. Currently, the best known explicit construction of split-state coding schemes is due to Aggarwal, Dodis and Lovett (ECCC TR13-081) which only achieves vanishing (polynomially small) rate
Two-Source Condensers with Low Error and Small Entropy Gap via Entropy-Resilient Functions
In their seminal work, Chattopadhyay and Zuckerman (STOC\u2716) constructed a two-source extractor with error epsilon for n-bit sources having min-entropy {polylog}(n/epsilon). Unfortunately, the construction\u27s running-time is {poly}(n/epsilon), which means that with polynomial-time constructions, only polynomially-small errors are possible. Our main result is a {poly}(n,log(1/epsilon))-time computable two-source condenser. For any k >= {polylog}(n/epsilon), our condenser transforms two independent (n,k)-sources to a distribution over m = k-O(log(1/epsilon)) bits that is epsilon-close to having min-entropy m - o(log(1/epsilon)). Hence, achieving entropy gap of o(log(1/epsilon)).
The bottleneck for obtaining low error in recent constructions of two-source extractors lies in the use of resilient functions. Informally, this is a function that receives input bits from r players with the property that the function\u27s output has small bias even if a bounded number of corrupted players feed adversarial inputs after seeing the inputs of the other players. The drawback of using resilient functions is that the error cannot be smaller than ln r/r. This, in return, forces the running time of the construction to be polynomial in 1/epsilon.
A key component in our construction is a variant of resilient functions which we call entropy-resilient functions. This variant can be seen as playing the above game for several rounds, each round outputting one bit. The goal of the corrupted players is to reduce, with as high probability as they can, the min-entropy accumulated throughout the rounds. We show that while the bias decreases only polynomially with the number of players in a one-round game, their success probability decreases exponentially in the entropy gap they are attempting to incur in a repeated game
Non-Malleable Codes for Small-Depth Circuits
We construct efficient, unconditional non-malleable codes that are secure
against tampering functions computed by small-depth circuits. For
constant-depth circuits of polynomial size (i.e. tampering
functions), our codes have codeword length for a -bit
message. This is an exponential improvement of the previous best construction
due to Chattopadhyay and Li (STOC 2017), which had codeword length
. Our construction remains efficient for circuit depths as
large as (indeed, our codeword length remains
, and extending our result beyond this would require
separating from .
We obtain our codes via a new efficient non-malleable reduction from
small-depth tampering to split-state tampering. A novel aspect of our work is
the incorporation of techniques from unconditional derandomization into the
framework of non-malleable reductions. In particular, a key ingredient in our
analysis is a recent pseudorandom switching lemma of Trevisan and Xue (CCC
2013), a derandomization of the influential switching lemma from circuit
complexity; the randomness-efficiency of this switching lemma translates into
the rate-efficiency of our codes via our non-malleable reduction.Comment: 26 pages, 4 figure
A Quantum-Proof Non-Malleable Extractor, With Application to Privacy Amplification against Active Quantum Adversaries
In privacy amplification, two mutually trusted parties aim to amplify the
secrecy of an initial shared secret in order to establish a shared private
key by exchanging messages over an insecure communication channel. If the
channel is authenticated the task can be solved in a single round of
communication using a strong randomness extractor; choosing a quantum-proof
extractor allows one to establish security against quantum adversaries.
In the case that the channel is not authenticated, Dodis and Wichs (STOC'09)
showed that the problem can be solved in two rounds of communication using a
non-malleable extractor, a stronger pseudo-random construction than a strong
extractor.
We give the first construction of a non-malleable extractor that is secure
against quantum adversaries. The extractor is based on a construction by Li
(FOCS'12), and is able to extract from source of min-entropy rates larger than
. Combining this construction with a quantum-proof variant of the
reduction of Dodis and Wichs, shown by Cohen and Vidick (unpublished), we
obtain the first privacy amplification protocol secure against active quantum
adversaries
An entropy lower bound for non-malleable extractors
A (k, ε)-non-malleable extractor is a function nmExt : {0, 1} n × {0, 1} d → {0, 1} that takes two inputs, a weak source X ~ {0, 1} n of min-entropy k and an independent uniform seed s E {0, 1} d , and outputs a bit nmExt(X, s) that is ε-close to uniform, even given the seed s and the value nmExt(X, s') for an adversarially chosen seed s' ≠ s. Dodis and Wichs (STOC 2009) showed the existence of (k, ε)-non-malleable extractors with seed length d = log(n - k - 1) + 2 log(1/ε) + 6 that support sources of min-entropy k > log(d) + 2 log(1/ε) + 8. We show that the foregoing bound is essentially tight, by proving that any (k, ε)-non-malleable extractor must satisfy the min-entropy bound k > log(d) + 2 log(1/ε) - log log(1/ε) - C for an absolute constant C. In particular, this implies that non-malleable extractors require min-entropy at least Ω(loglog(n)). This is in stark contrast to the existence of strong seeded extractors that support sources of min-entropy k = O(log(1/ε)). Our techniques strongly rely on coding theory. In particular, we reveal an inherent connection between non-malleable extractors and error correcting codes, by proving a new lemma which shows that any (k, ε)-non-malleable extractor with seed length d induces a code C ⊆ {0,1} 2k with relative distance 1/2 - 2ε and rate d-1/2k
Limits to Non-Malleability
There have been many successes in constructing explicit non-malleable codes for various classes of tampering functions in recent years, and strong existential results are also known. In this work we ask the following question:
When can we rule out the existence of a non-malleable code for a tampering class ??
First, we start with some classes where positive results are well-known, and show that when these classes are extended in a natural way, non-malleable codes are no longer possible. Specifically, we show that no non-malleable codes exist for any of the following tampering classes:
- Functions that change d/2 symbols, where d is the distance of the code;
- Functions where each input symbol affects only a single output symbol;
- Functions where each of the n output bits is a function of n-log n input bits.
Furthermore, we rule out constructions of non-malleable codes for certain classes ? via reductions to the assumption that a distributional problem is hard for ?, that make black-box use of the tampering functions in the proof. In particular, this yields concrete obstacles for the construction of efficient codes for NC, even assuming average-case variants of P ? NC
- …