2,438 research outputs found

    Tradeoffs for nearest neighbors on the sphere

    Get PDF
    We consider tradeoffs between the query and update complexities for the (approximate) nearest neighbor problem on the sphere, extending the recent spherical filters to sparse regimes and generalizing the scheme and analysis to account for different tradeoffs. In a nutshell, for the sparse regime the tradeoff between the query complexity nρqn^{\rho_q} and update complexity nρun^{\rho_u} for data sets of size nn is given by the following equation in terms of the approximation factor cc and the exponents ρq\rho_q and ρu\rho_u: c2ρq+(c2βˆ’1)ρu=2c2βˆ’1.c^2\sqrt{\rho_q}+(c^2-1)\sqrt{\rho_u}=\sqrt{2c^2-1}. For small c=1+Ο΅c=1+\epsilon, minimizing the time for updates leads to a linear space complexity at the cost of a query time complexity n1βˆ’4Ο΅2n^{1-4\epsilon^2}. Balancing the query and update costs leads to optimal complexities n1/(2c2βˆ’1)n^{1/(2c^2-1)}, matching bounds from [Andoni-Razenshteyn, 2015] and [Dubiner, IEEE-TIT'10] and matching the asymptotic complexities of [Andoni-Razenshteyn, STOC'15] and [Andoni-Indyk-Laarhoven-Razenshteyn-Schmidt, NIPS'15]. A subpolynomial query time complexity no(1)n^{o(1)} can be achieved at the cost of a space complexity of the order n1/(4Ο΅2)n^{1/(4\epsilon^2)}, matching the bound nΞ©(1/Ο΅2)n^{\Omega(1/\epsilon^2)} of [Andoni-Indyk-Patrascu, FOCS'06] and [Panigrahy-Talwar-Wieder, FOCS'10] and improving upon results of [Indyk-Motwani, STOC'98] and [Kushilevitz-Ostrovsky-Rabani, STOC'98]. For large cc, minimizing the update complexity results in a query complexity of n2/c2+O(1/c4)n^{2/c^2+O(1/c^4)}, improving upon the related exponent for large cc of [Kapralov, PODS'15] by a factor 22, and matching the bound nΞ©(1/c2)n^{\Omega(1/c^2)} of [Panigrahy-Talwar-Wieder, FOCS'08]. Balancing the costs leads to optimal complexities n1/(2c2βˆ’1)n^{1/(2c^2-1)}, while a minimum query time complexity can be achieved with update complexity n2/c2+O(1/c4)n^{2/c^2+O(1/c^4)}, improving upon the previous best exponents of Kapralov by a factor 22.Comment: 16 pages, 1 table, 2 figures. Mostly subsumed by arXiv:1608.03580 [cs.DS] (along with arXiv:1605.02701 [cs.DS]

    Coding for Errors and Erasures in Random Network Coding

    Get PDF
    The problem of error-control in random linear network coding is considered. A ``noncoherent'' or ``channel oblivious'' model is assumed where neither transmitter nor receiver is assumed to have knowledge of the channel transfer characteristic. Motivated by the property that linear network coding is vector-space preserving, information transmission is modelled as the injection into the network of a basis for a vector space VV and the collection by the receiver of a basis for a vector space UU. A metric on the projective geometry associated with the packet space is introduced, and it is shown that a minimum distance decoder for this metric achieves correct decoding if the dimension of the space V∩UV \cap U is sufficiently large. If the dimension of each codeword is restricted to a fixed integer, the code forms a subset of a finite-field Grassmannian, or, equivalently, a subset of the vertices of the corresponding Grassmann graph. Sphere-packing and sphere-covering bounds as well as a generalization of the Singleton bound are provided for such codes. Finally, a Reed-Solomon-like code construction, related to Gabidulin's construction of maximum rank-distance codes, is described and a Sudan-style ``list-1'' minimum distance decoding algorithm is provided.Comment: This revised paper contains some minor changes and clarification
    • …
    corecore