2,846 research outputs found
Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs using Weighted CNF's
Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs in which some of the facts
are annotated with probabilities. Several classical probabilistic inference
tasks (such as MAP and computing marginals) have not yet received a lot of
attention for this formalism. The contribution of this paper is that we develop
efficient inference algorithms for these tasks. This is based on a conversion
of the probabilistic logic program and the query and evidence to a weighted CNF
formula. This allows us to reduce the inference tasks to well-studied tasks
such as weighted model counting. To solve such tasks, we employ
state-of-the-art methods. We consider multiple methods for the conversion of
the programs as well as for inference on the weighted CNF. The resulting
approach is evaluated experimentally and shown to improve upon the
state-of-the-art in probabilistic logic programming
Exploiting Macro-actions and Predicting Plan Length in Planning as Satisfiability
The use of automatically learned knowledge for a planning domain can significantly improve the performance of a generic planner when solving a problem in this domain. In this work, we focus on the well-known SAT-based approach to planning and investigate two types of learned knowledge that have not been studied in this planning framework before: macro-actions and planning horizon. Macro-actions are sequences of actions that typically occur in the solution plans, while a planning horizon of a problem is the length of a (possibly optimal) plan solving it. We propose a method that uses a machine learning tool for building a predictive model of the optimal planning horizon, and variants of the well-known planner SatPlan and solver MiniSat that can exploit macro actions
and learned planning horizons to improve their performance. An experimental analysis illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed techniques
Recommended from our members
Structure identification in relational data
This paper presents several investigations into the prospects for identifying meaningful structures in empirical data, namely, structures permitting effective organization of the data to meet requirements of future queries. We propose a general framework whereby the notion of identifiability is given a precise formal definition similar to that of learnability. Using this framework, we then explore if a tractable procedure exists for deciding whether a given relation is decomposable into a constraint network or a CNF theory with desirable topology and, if the answer is positive, identifying the desired decomposition. Finally, we address the problem of expressing a given relation as a Horn theory and, if this is impossible, finding the best k-Horn approximation to the given relation. We show that both problems can be solved in time polynomial in the length of the data
Online Learning of k-CNF Boolean Functions
This paper revisits the problem of learning a k-CNF Boolean function from
examples in the context of online learning under the logarithmic loss. In doing
so, we give a Bayesian interpretation to one of Valiant's celebrated PAC
learning algorithms, which we then build upon to derive two efficient, online,
probabilistic, supervised learning algorithms for predicting the output of an
unknown k-CNF Boolean function. We analyze the loss of our methods, and show
that the cumulative log-loss can be upper bounded, ignoring logarithmic
factors, by a polynomial function of the size of each example.Comment: 20 LaTeX pages. 2 Algorithms. Some Theorem
Breaking Instance-Independent Symmetries In Exact Graph Coloring
Code optimization and high level synthesis can be posed as constraint
satisfaction and optimization problems, such as graph coloring used in register
allocation. Graph coloring is also used to model more traditional CSPs relevant
to AI, such as planning, time-tabling and scheduling. Provably optimal
solutions may be desirable for commercial and defense applications.
Additionally, for applications such as register allocation and code
optimization, naturally-occurring instances of graph coloring are often small
and can be solved optimally. A recent wave of improvements in algorithms for
Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and 0-1 Integer Linear Programming (ILP) suggests
generic problem-reduction methods, rather than problem-specific heuristics,
because (1) heuristics may be upset by new constraints, (2) heuristics tend to
ignore structure, and (3) many relevant problems are provably inapproximable.
Problem reductions often lead to highly symmetric SAT instances, and
symmetries are known to slow down SAT solvers. In this work, we compare several
avenues for symmetry breaking, in particular when certain kinds of symmetry are
present in all generated instances. Our focus on reducing CSPs to SAT allows us
to leverage recent dramatic improvement in SAT solvers and automatically
benefit from future progress. We can use a variety of black-box SAT solvers
without modifying their source code because our symmetry-breaking techniques
are static, i.e., we detect symmetries and add symmetry breaking predicates
(SBPs) during pre-processing.
An important result of our work is that among the types of
instance-independent SBPs we studied and their combinations, the simplest and
least complete constructions are the most effective. Our experiments also
clearly indicate that instance-independent symmetries should mostly be
processed together with instance-specific symmetries rather than at the
specification level, contrary to what has been suggested in the literature
- …