Convex hulls of spheres and convex hulls of convex polytopes lying on parallel hyperplanes

Given a set $\Sigma$ of spheres in $\mathbb{E}^d$, with $d\ge{}3$ and $d$ odd, having a fixed number of $m$ distinct radii $\rho_1,\rho_2,...,\rho_m$, we show that the worst-case combinatorial complexity of the convex hull $CH_d(\Sigma)$ of $\Sigma$ is $\Theta(\sum_{1\le{}i\ne{}j\le{}m}n_in_j^{\lfloor\frac{d}{2}\rfloor})$, where $n_i$ is the number of spheres in $\Sigma$ with radius $\rho_i$. To prove the lower bound, we construct a set of $\Theta(n_1+n_2)$ spheres in $\mathbb{E}^d$, with $d\ge{}3$ odd, where $n_i$ spheres have radius $\rho_i$, $i=1,2$, and $\rho_2\ne\rho_1$, such that their convex hull has combinatorial complexity $\Omega(n_1n_2^{\lfloor\frac{d}{2}\rfloor}+n_2n_1^{\lfloor\frac{d}{2}\rfloor})$. Our construction is then generalized to the case where the spheres have $m\ge{}3$ distinct radii. For the upper bound, we reduce the sphere convex hull problem to the problem of computing the worst-case combinatorial complexity of the convex hull of a set of $m$ $d$-dimensional convex polytopes lying on $m$ parallel hyperplanes in $\mathbb{E}^{d+1}$, where $d\ge{}3$ odd, a problem which is of independent interest. More precisely, we show that the worst-case combinatorial complexity of the convex hull of a set $\{\mathcal{P}_1,\mathcal{P}_2,...,\mathcal{P}_m\}$ of $m$ $d$-dimensional convex polytopes lying on $m$ parallel hyperplanes of $\mathbb{E}^{d+1}$ is $O(\sum_{1\le{}i\ne{}j\le{}m}n_in_j^{\lfloor\frac{d}{2}\rfloor})$, where $n_i$ is the number of vertices of $\mathcal{P}_i$. We end with algorithmic considerations, and we show how our tight bounds for the parallel polytope convex hull problem, yield tight bounds on the combinatorial complexity of the Minkowski sum of two convex polytopes in $\mathbb{E}^d$.Comment: 22 pages, 5 figures, new proof of upper bound for the complexity of the convex hull of parallel polytopes (the new proof gives upper bounds for all face numbers of the convex hull of the parallel polytopes

Lifting Linear Extension Complexity Bounds to the Mixed-Integer Setting

Mixed-integer mathematical programs are among the most commonly used models for a wide set of problems in Operations Research and related fields. However, there is still very little known about what can be expressed by small mixed-integer programs. In particular, prior to this work, it was open whether some classical problems, like the minimum odd-cut problem, can be expressed by a compact mixed-integer program with few (even constantly many) integer variables. This is in stark contrast to linear formulations, where recent breakthroughs in the field of extended formulations have shown that many polytopes associated to classical combinatorial optimization problems do not even admit approximate extended formulations of sub-exponential size. We provide a general framework for lifting inapproximability results of extended formulations to the setting of mixed-integer extended formulations, and obtain almost tight lower bounds on the number of integer variables needed to describe a variety of classical combinatorial optimization problems. Among the implications we obtain, we show that any mixed-integer extended formulation of sub-exponential size for the matching polytope, cut polytope, traveling salesman polytope or dominant of the odd-cut polytope, needs $\Omega(n/\log n)$ many integer variables, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the underlying graph. Conversely, the above-mentioned polyhedra admit polynomial-size mixed-integer formulations with only $O(n)$ or $O(n \log n)$ (for the traveling salesman polytope) many integer variables. Our results build upon a new decomposition technique that, for any convex set $C$, allows for approximating any mixed-integer description of $C$ by the intersection of $C$ with the union of a small number of affine subspaces.Comment: A conference version of this paper will be presented at SODA 201

The maximum number of faces of the Minkowski sum of two convex polytopes

We derive tight expressions for the maximum number of $k$-faces, $0\le{}k\le{}d-1$, of the Minkowski sum, $P_1\oplus{}P_2$, of two $d$-dimensional convex polytopes $P_1$ and $P_2$, as a function of the number of vertices of the polytopes. For even dimensions $d\ge{}2$, the maximum values are attained when $P_1$ and $P_2$ are cyclic $d$-polytopes with disjoint vertex sets. For odd dimensions $d\ge{}3$, the maximum values are attained when $P_1$ and $P_2$ are $\lfloor\frac{d}{2}\rfloor$-neighborly $d$-polytopes, whose vertex sets are chosen appropriately from two distinct $d$-dimensional moment-like curves.Comment: 37 pages, 8 figures, conference version to appear at SODA 2012; v2: fixed typos, made stylistic changes, added figure

Maximal admissible faces and asymptotic bounds for the normal surface solution space

The enumeration of normal surfaces is a key bottleneck in computational three-dimensional topology. The underlying procedure is the enumeration of admissible vertices of a high-dimensional polytope, where admissibility is a powerful but non-linear and non-convex constraint. The main results of this paper are significant improvements upon the best known asymptotic bounds on the number of admissible vertices, using polytopes in both the standard normal surface coordinate system and the streamlined quadrilateral coordinate system. To achieve these results we examine the layout of admissible points within these polytopes. We show that these points correspond to well-behaved substructures of the face lattice, and we study properties of the corresponding "admissible faces". Key lemmata include upper bounds on the number of maximal admissible faces of each dimension, and a bijection between the maximal admissible faces in the two coordinate systems mentioned above.Comment: 31 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables; v2: minor revisions (to appear in Journal of Combinatorial Theory A

The Orchard crossing number of an abstract graph

We introduce the Orchard crossing number, which is defined in a similar way to the well-known rectilinear crossing number. We compute the Orchard crossing number for some simple families of graphs. We also prove some properties of this crossing number. Moreover, we define a variant of this crossing number which is tightly connected to the rectilinear crossing number, and compute it for some simple families of graphs.Comment: 17 pages, 10 figures. Totally revised, new material added. Submitte

Efficient Algorithms for Privately Releasing Marginals via Convex Relaxations

Consider a database of $n$ people, each represented by a bit-string of length $d$ corresponding to the setting of $d$ binary attributes. A $k$-way marginal query is specified by a subset $S$ of $k$ attributes, and a $|S|$-dimensional binary vector $\beta$ specifying their values. The result for this query is a count of the number of people in the database whose attribute vector restricted to $S$ agrees with $\beta$. Privately releasing approximate answers to a set of $k$-way marginal queries is one of the most important and well-motivated problems in differential privacy. Information theoretically, the error complexity of marginal queries is well-understood: the per-query additive error is known to be at least $\Omega(\min\{\sqrt{n},d^{\frac{k}{2}}\})$ and at most $\tilde{O}(\min\{\sqrt{n} d^{1/4},d^{\frac{k}{2}}\})$. However, no polynomial time algorithm with error complexity as low as the information theoretic upper bound is known for small $n$. In this work we present a polynomial time algorithm that, for any distribution on marginal queries, achieves average error at most $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n} d^{\frac{\lceil k/2 \rceil}{4}})$. This error bound is as good as the best known information theoretic upper bounds for $k=2$. This bound is an improvement over previous work on efficiently releasing marginals when $k$ is small and when error $o(n)$ is desirable. Using private boosting we are also able to give nearly matching worst-case error bounds. Our algorithms are based on the geometric techniques of Nikolov, Talwar, and Zhang. The main new ingredients are convex relaxations and careful use of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm for constrained convex minimization. To design our relaxations, we rely on the Grothendieck inequality from functional analysis