1,448 research outputs found
Algorithmic Verification of Asynchronous Programs
Asynchronous programming is a ubiquitous systems programming idiom to manage
concurrent interactions with the environment. In this style, instead of waiting
for time-consuming operations to complete, the programmer makes a non-blocking
call to the operation and posts a callback task to a task buffer that is
executed later when the time-consuming operation completes. A co-operative
scheduler mediates the interaction by picking and executing callback tasks from
the task buffer to completion (and these callbacks can post further callbacks
to be executed later). Writing correct asynchronous programs is hard because
the use of callbacks, while efficient, obscures program control flow.
We provide a formal model underlying asynchronous programs and study
verification problems for this model. We show that the safety verification
problem for finite-data asynchronous programs is expspace-complete. We show
that liveness verification for finite-data asynchronous programs is decidable
and polynomial-time equivalent to Petri Net reachability. Decidability is not
obvious, since even if the data is finite-state, asynchronous programs
constitute infinite-state transition systems: both the program stack and the
task buffer of pending asynchronous calls can be potentially unbounded.
Our main technical construction is a polynomial-time semantics-preserving
reduction from asynchronous programs to Petri Nets and conversely. The
reduction allows the use of algorithmic techniques on Petri Nets to the
verification of asynchronous programs.
We also study several extensions to the basic models of asynchronous programs
that are inspired by additional capabilities provided by implementations of
asynchronous libraries, and classify the decidability and undecidability of
verification questions on these extensions.Comment: 46 pages, 9 figure
Forward Analysis and Model Checking for Trace Bounded WSTS
We investigate a subclass of well-structured transition systems (WSTS), the
bounded---in the sense of Ginsburg and Spanier (Trans. AMS 1964)---complete
deterministic ones, which we claim provide an adequate basis for the study of
forward analyses as developed by Finkel and Goubault-Larrecq (Logic. Meth.
Comput. Sci. 2012). Indeed, we prove that, unlike other conditions considered
previously for the termination of forward analysis, boundedness is decidable.
Boundedness turns out to be a valuable restriction for WSTS verification, as we
show that it further allows to decide all -regular properties on the
set of infinite traces of the system
SPDL Model Checking via Property-Driven State Space Generation
In this report we describe how both, memory and time requirements for stochastic model checking of SPDL (stochastic propositional dynamic logic) formulae can significantly be reduced. SPDL is the stochastic extension of the multi-modal program logic PDL.\ud
SPDL provides means to specify path-based properties with or without timing restrictions. Paths can be characterised by so-called programs, essentially regular expressions, where the executability can be made dependent on the validity of test formulae. For model-checking SPDL path formulae it is necessary to build a product transition system (PTS)\ud
between the system model and the program automaton belonging to the path formula that is to be verified.\ud
In many cases, this PTS can be drastically reduced during the model checking procedure, as the program restricts the number of potentially satisfying paths. Therefore, we propose an approach that directly generates the reduced PTS from a given SPA specification and an SPDL path formula.\ud
The feasibility of this approach is shown through a selection of case studies, which show enormous state space reductions, at no increase in generation time.\u
Static Analysis of Deterministic Negotiations
Negotiation diagrams are a model of concurrent computation akin to workflow
Petri nets. Deterministic negotiation diagrams, equivalent to the much studied
and used free-choice workflow Petri nets, are surprisingly amenable to
verification. Soundness (a property close to deadlock-freedom) can be decided
in PTIME. Further, other fundamental questions like computing summaries or the
expected cost, can also be solved in PTIME for sound deterministic negotiation
diagrams, while they are PSPACE-complete in the general case.
In this paper we generalize and explain these results. We extend the
classical "meet-over-all-paths" (MOP) formulation of static analysis problems
to our concurrent setting, and introduce Mazurkiewicz-invariant analysis
problems, which encompass the questions above and new ones. We show that any
Mazurkiewicz-invariant analysis problem can be solved in PTIME for sound
deterministic negotiations whenever it is in PTIME for sequential
flow-graphs---even though the flow-graph of a deterministic negotiation diagram
can be exponentially larger than the diagram itself. This gives a common
explanation to the low-complexity of all the analysis questions studied so far.
Finally, we show that classical gen/kill analyses are also an instance of our
framework, and obtain a PTIME algorithm for detecting anti-patterns in
free-choice workflow Petri nets.
Our result is based on a novel decomposition theorem, of independent
interest, showing that sound deterministic negotiation diagrams can be
hierarchically decomposed into (possibly overlapping) smaller sound diagrams.Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of LICS 2017, IEEE Computer Societ
- ā¦