7,867 research outputs found
The Challenge of Unifying Semantic and Syntactic Inference Restrictions
While syntactic inference restrictions don't play an important role for SAT, they are an essential reasoning technique for more expressive logics, such as first-order logic, or fragments thereof. In particular, they can result in short proofs or model representations. On the other hand, semantically guided inference systems enjoy important properties, such as the generation of solely non-redundant clauses. I discuss to what extend the two paradigms may be unifiable
Hardness measures and resolution lower bounds
Various "hardness" measures have been studied for resolution, providing
theoretical insight into the proof complexity of resolution and its fragments,
as well as explanations for the hardness of instances in SAT solving. In this
report we aim at a unified view of a number of hardness measures, including
different measures of width, space and size of resolution proofs. We also
extend these measures to all clause-sets (possibly satisfiable).Comment: 43 pages, preliminary version (yet the application part is only
sketched, with proofs missing
On the Hardness of SAT with Community Structure
Recent attempts to explain the effectiveness of Boolean satisfiability (SAT)
solvers based on conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) on large industrial
benchmarks have focused on the concept of community structure. Specifically,
industrial benchmarks have been empirically found to have good community
structure, and experiments seem to show a correlation between such structure
and the efficiency of CDCL. However, in this paper we establish hardness
results suggesting that community structure is not sufficient to explain the
success of CDCL in practice. First, we formally characterize a property shared
by a wide class of metrics capturing community structure, including
"modularity". Next, we show that the SAT instances with good community
structure according to any metric with this property are still NP-hard.
Finally, we study a class of random instances generated from the
"pseudo-industrial" community attachment model of Gir\'aldez-Cru and Levy. We
prove that, with high probability, instances from this model that have
relatively few communities but are still highly modular require exponentially
long resolution proofs and so are hard for CDCL. We also present experimental
evidence that our result continues to hold for instances with many more
communities. This indicates that actual industrial instances easily solved by
CDCL may have some other relevant structure not captured by the community
attachment model.Comment: 23 pages. Full version of a SAT 2016 pape
Strongly Refuting Random CSPs Below the Spectral Threshold
Random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are known to exhibit threshold
phenomena: given a uniformly random instance of a CSP with variables and
clauses, there is a value of beyond which the CSP will be
unsatisfiable with high probability. Strong refutation is the problem of
certifying that no variable assignment satisfies more than a constant fraction
of clauses; this is the natural algorithmic problem in the unsatisfiable regime
(when ).
Intuitively, strong refutation should become easier as the clause density
grows, because the contradictions introduced by the random clauses become
more locally apparent. For CSPs such as -SAT and -XOR, there is a
long-standing gap between the clause density at which efficient strong
refutation algorithms are known, , and the
clause density at which instances become unsatisfiable with high probability,
.
In this paper, we give spectral and sum-of-squares algorithms for strongly
refuting random -XOR instances with clause density in time or in
rounds of the sum-of-squares hierarchy, for any
and any integer . Our algorithms provide a smooth
transition between the clause density at which polynomial-time algorithms are
known at , and brute-force refutation at the satisfiability
threshold when . We also leverage our -XOR results to obtain
strong refutation algorithms for SAT (or any other Boolean CSP) at similar
clause densities. Our algorithms match the known sum-of-squares lower bounds
due to Grigoriev and Schonebeck, up to logarithmic factors.
Additionally, we extend our techniques to give new results for certifying
upper bounds on the injective tensor norm of random tensors
- …