1,074 research outputs found

    Soft-Decision Low-Complexity Chase Decoders for the RS(255,239) Code

    Full text link
    [EN] In this work, we present a new architecture for soft-decision Reed-Solomon (RS) Low-Complexity Chase (LCC) decoding. The proposed architecture is scalable and can be used for a high number of test vectors. We propose a novel Multiplicity Assignment stage that sorts and stores only the location of the errors inside the symbols and the powers of a that identify the positions of the symbols in the frame. Novel schematics for the Syndrome Update and Symbol Modification blocks that are adapted to the proposed sorting stage are also presented. We also propose novel solutions for the problems that arise when a high number of test vectors is processed. We implemented three decoders: a h = 4 LCC decoder and two decoders that only decode 31 and 60 test vectors of true h = 5 and h = 6 LCC decoders, respectively. For example, our h = 4 decoder requires 29% less look-up tables in Virtex-V Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) devices than the best soft-decision RS decoder published to date, while has a 0.07 dB coding gain over that decoder.This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and FEDER grant number TEC2015-70858-C2-2-RTorres Carot, V.; Valls Coquillat, J.; Canet Subiela, MJ.; GarcĂ­a Herrero, FM. (2019). Soft-Decision Low-Complexity Chase Decoders for the RS(255,239) Code. Electronics. 8(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8010010S11381Cideciyan, R., Gustlin, M., Li, M., Wang, J., & Wang, Z. (2013). Next generation backplane and copper cable challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(12), 130-136. doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6685768Koetter, R., & Vardy, A. (2003). Algebraic soft-decision decoding of reed-solomon codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(11), 2809-2825. doi:10.1109/tit.2003.819332Sudan, M. (1997). Decoding of Reed Solomon Codes beyond the Error-Correction Bound. Journal of Complexity, 13(1), 180-193. doi:10.1006/jcom.1997.0439Guruswami, V., & Sudan, M. (1999). Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometry codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45(6), 1757-1767. doi:10.1109/18.782097Jiang, J., & Narayanan, K. R. (2008). Algebraic Soft-Decision Decoding of Reed–Solomon Codes Using Bit-Level Soft Information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 54(9), 3907-3928. doi:10.1109/tit.2008.928238Jiangli Zhu, Xinmiao Zhang, & Zhongfeng Wang. (2009). Backward Interpolation Architecture for Algebraic Soft-Decision Reed–Solomon Decoding. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 17(11), 1602-1615. doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2008.2005575Jiangli Zhu, & Xinmiao Zhang. (2008). Efficient VLSI Architecture for Soft-Decision Decoding of Reed–Solomon Codes. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 55(10), 3050-3062. doi:10.1109/tcsi.2008.923169Zhongfeng Wang, & Jun Ma. (2006). High-Speed Interpolation Architecture for Soft-Decision Decoding of Reed–Solomon Codes. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 14(9), 937-950. doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2006.884046Zhang, X. (2006). Reduced Complexity Interpolation Architecture for Soft-Decision Reed–Solomon Decoding. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 14(10), 1156-1161. doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2006.884177Xinmiao Zhang, & Parhi, K. K. (2005). Fast factorization architecture in soft-decision Reed-Solomon decoding. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 13(4), 413-426. doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2004.842914Bellorado, J., & Kavcic, A. (2010). Low-Complexity Soft-Decoding Algorithms for Reed–Solomon Codes—Part I: An Algebraic Soft-In Hard-Out Chase Decoder. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(3), 945-959. doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2039073GarcĂ­a-Herrero, F., Valls, J., & Meher, P. K. (2011). High-Speed RS(255, 239) Decoder Based on LCC Decoding. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 30(6), 1643-1669. doi:10.1007/s00034-011-9327-4Zhang, W., Wang, H., & Pan, B. (2013). Reduced-Complexity LCC Reed–Solomon Decoder Based on Unified Syndrome Computation. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 21(5), 974-978. doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2012.2197030Peng, X., Zhang, W., Ji, W., Liang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2015). Reduced-Complexity Multiplicity Assignment Algorithm and Architecture for Low-Complexity Chase Decoder of Reed-Solomon Codes. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(11), 1865-1868. doi:10.1109/lcomm.2015.2477495Lin, Y.-M., Hsu, C.-H., Chang, H.-C., & Lee, C.-Y. (2014). A 2.56 Gb/s Soft RS (255, 239) Decoder Chip for Optical Communication Systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 61(7), 2110-2118. doi:10.1109/tcsi.2014.2298282Wu, Y. (2015). New Scalable Decoder Architectures for Reed–Solomon Codes. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 63(8), 2741-2761. doi:10.1109/tcomm.2015.2445759Garcia-Herrero, F., Canet, M. J., Valls, J., & Meher, P. K. (2012). High-Throughput Interpolator Architecture for Low-Complexity Chase Decoding of RS Codes. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 20(3), 568-573. doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2010.210396

    Iterative Algebraic Soft-Decision List Decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we present an iterative soft-decision decoding algorithm for Reed-Solomon codes offering both complexity and performance advantages over previously known decoding algorithms. Our algorithm is a list decoding algorithm which combines two powerful soft decision decoding techniques which were previously regarded in the literature as competitive, namely, the Koetter-Vardy algebraic soft-decision decoding algorithm and belief-propagation based on adaptive parity check matrices, recently proposed by Jiang and Narayanan. Building on the Jiang-Narayanan algorithm, we present a belief-propagation based algorithm with a significant reduction in computational complexity. We introduce the concept of using a belief-propagation based decoder to enhance the soft-input information prior to decoding with an algebraic soft-decision decoder. Our algorithm can also be viewed as an interpolation multiplicity assignment scheme for algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed-Solomon codes.Comment: Submitted to IEEE for publication in Jan 200

    Iterative Soft Input Soft Output Decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes by Adapting the Parity Check Matrix

    Full text link
    An iterative algorithm is presented for soft-input-soft-output (SISO) decoding of Reed-Solomon (RS) codes. The proposed iterative algorithm uses the sum product algorithm (SPA) in conjunction with a binary parity check matrix of the RS code. The novelty is in reducing a submatrix of the binary parity check matrix that corresponds to less reliable bits to a sparse nature before the SPA is applied at each iteration. The proposed algorithm can be geometrically interpreted as a two-stage gradient descent with an adaptive potential function. This adaptive procedure is crucial to the convergence behavior of the gradient descent algorithm and, therefore, significantly improves the performance. Simulation results show that the proposed decoding algorithm and its variations provide significant gain over hard decision decoding (HDD) and compare favorably with other popular soft decision decoding methods.Comment: 10 pages, 10 figures, final version accepted by IEEE Trans. on Information Theor

    A New Chase-type Soft-decision Decoding Algorithm for Reed-Solomon Codes

    Full text link
    This paper addresses three relevant issues arising in designing Chase-type algorithms for Reed-Solomon codes: 1) how to choose the set of testing patterns; 2) given the set of testing patterns, what is the optimal testing order in the sense that the most-likely codeword is expected to appear earlier; and 3) how to identify the most-likely codeword. A new Chase-type soft-decision decoding algorithm is proposed, referred to as tree-based Chase-type algorithm. The proposed algorithm takes the set of all vectors as the set of testing patterns, and hence definitely delivers the most-likely codeword provided that the computational resources are allowed. All the testing patterns are arranged in an ordered rooted tree according to the likelihood bounds of the possibly generated codewords. While performing the algorithm, the ordered rooted tree is constructed progressively by adding at most two leafs at each trial. The ordered tree naturally induces a sufficient condition for the most-likely codeword. That is, whenever the proposed algorithm exits before a preset maximum number of trials is reached, the output codeword must be the most-likely one. When the proposed algorithm is combined with Guruswami-Sudan (GS) algorithm, each trial can be implement in an extremely simple way by removing one old point and interpolating one new point. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm performs better than the recently proposed Chase-type algorithm by Bellorado et al with less trials given that the maximum number of trials is the same. Also proposed are simulation-based performance bounds on the MLD algorithm, which are utilized to illustrate the near-optimality of the proposed algorithm in the high SNR region. In addition, the proposed algorithm admits decoding with a likelihood threshold, that searches the most-likely codeword within an Euclidean sphere rather than a Hamming sphere
    • …
    corecore