20,459 research outputs found
Current usage of Component based Principles for Developing Web Applications with Frameworks: A Literature Review
Component based software development has become a very popular paradigm in many software engineering branches. In the early phase of Web 2.0 appearance, it was also popular for web application development. From the analyzed papers, between this period and today, use of component based techniques for web application development was somewhat slowed down, however, the recent development indicates a comeback. Most of all it is apparent with W3Câs component web working group. In this article we want to investigate the current state of web application development with component approach. Most of all we are interested in which way components are used, which web development frameworks are being used, for which domains is component based web development most popular and successful, etc. How many current web development frameworks explicitly refer to component-based approach? To answer this question, we performed a literature review
A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid Computing
With the advent of Grid and application technologies, scientists and
engineers are building more and more complex applications to manage and process
large data sets, and execute scientific experiments on distributed resources.
Such application scenarios require means for composing and executing complex
workflows. Therefore, many efforts have been made towards the development of
workflow management systems for Grid computing. In this paper, we propose a
taxonomy that characterizes and classifies various approaches for building and
executing workflows on Grids. We also survey several representative Grid
workflow systems developed by various projects world-wide to demonstrate the
comprehensiveness of the taxonomy. The taxonomy not only highlights the design
and engineering similarities and differences of state-of-the-art in Grid
workflow systems, but also identifies the areas that need further research.Comment: 29 pages, 15 figure
An approach to build JSON-based Domain Specific Languages solutions for web applications
Because of their level of abstraction, Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) enable building applications that ease software implementation. In the context of web applications, we can find a lot of technologies and programming languages for server-side applications that provide fast, robust, and flexible solutions, whereas those for client-side applications are limited, and mostly restricted to directly use JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, JSON and XML. This article presents a novel approach to creating DSL-based web applications using JSON grammar (JSON-DSL) for both, the server and client side. The approach includes an evaluation engine, a programming model and an integrated web development environment that support it. The evaluation engine allows the execution of the elements created with the programming model. For its part, the programming model allows the definition and specification of JSON-DSLs, the implementation of JavaScript components, the use of JavaScript templates provided by the engine, the use of link connectors to heterogeneous information sources, and the integration with other widgets, web components and JavaScript frameworks. To validate the strength and capacity of our approach, we have developed four case studies that use the integrated web development environment to apply the programming model and check the results within the evaluation engin
OpenTox predictive toxicology framework: toxicological ontology and semantic media wiki-based OpenToxipedia
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The OpenTox Framework, developed by the partners in the OpenTox project (<url>http://www.opentox.org</url>), aims at providing a unified access to toxicity data, predictive models and validation procedures. Interoperability of resources is achieved using a common information model, based on the OpenTox ontologies, describing predictive algorithms, models and toxicity data. As toxicological data may come from different, heterogeneous sources, a deployed ontology, unifying the terminology and the resources, is critical for the rational and reliable organization of the data, and its automatic processing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The following related ontologies have been developed for OpenTox: a) Toxicological ontology â listing the toxicological endpoints; b) Organs system and Effects ontology â addressing organs, targets/examinations and effects observed in <it>in vivo</it> studies; c) ToxML ontology â representing semi-automatic conversion of the ToxML schema; d) OpenTox ontologyâ representation of OpenTox framework components: chemical compounds, datasets, types of algorithms, models and validation web services; e) ToxLinkâToxCast assays ontology and f) OpenToxipedia community knowledge resource on toxicology terminology.</p> <p>OpenTox components are made available through standardized REST web services, where every compound, data set, and predictive method has a unique resolvable address (URI), used to retrieve its Resource Description Framework (RDF) representation, or to initiate the associated calculations and generate new RDF-based resources.</p> <p>The services support the integration of toxicity and chemical data from various sources, the generation and validation of computer models for toxic effects, seamless integration of new algorithms and scientifically sound validation routines and provide a flexible framework, which allows building arbitrary number of applications, tailored to solving different problems by end users (e.g. toxicologists).</p> <p>Availability</p> <p>The OpenTox toxicological ontology projects may be accessed via the OpenTox ontology development page <url>http://www.opentox.org/dev/ontology</url>; the OpenTox ontology is available as OWL at <url>http://opentox.org/api/1 1/opentox.owl</url>, the ToxML - OWL conversion utility is an open source resource available at <url>http://ambit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ambit/branches/toxml-utils/</url></p
Bayesian Exponential Random Graph Models with Nodal Random Effects
We extend the well-known and widely used Exponential Random Graph Model
(ERGM) by including nodal random effects to compensate for heterogeneity in the
nodes of a network. The Bayesian framework for ERGMs proposed by Caimo and
Friel (2011) yields the basis of our modelling algorithm. A central question in
network models is the question of model selection and following the Bayesian
paradigm we focus on estimating Bayes factors. To do so we develop an
approximate but feasible calculation of the Bayes factor which allows one to
pursue model selection. Two data examples and a small simulation study
illustrate our mixed model approach and the corresponding model selection.Comment: 23 pages, 9 figures, 3 table
Practice-oriented controversies and borrowed epistemic credibility in current evolutionary biology: phylogeography as a case study
Although there is increasing recognition that theory and practice in science are intimately intertwined, philosophy of science perspectives on scientific controversies have been historically focused on theory rather than practice. As a step in the construction of frameworks for understanding controversies linked to scientific practices, here we introduce the notion of borrowed epistemic credibility (BEC), to describe the situation in which scientists, in order to garner support for their own stances, exploit similarities between tenets in their own field and accepted statements or positions properly developed within other areas of expertise. We illustrate the scope of application of our proposal with the analysis of a heavily methods-grounded, recent controversy in phylogeography, a biological subdiscipline concerned with the study of the historical causes of biogeographical variation through population genetics- and phylogenetics-based computer analyses of diversity in DNA sequences, both within species and between closely related taxa. Toward this end, we briefly summarize the arguments proposed by selected authors representing each side of the controversy: the ânested clade analysisâ school versus the âstatistical phylogeographyâ orientation. We claim that whereas both phylogeographic âresearch stylesâ borrow epistemic credibility from sources such as formal logic, the familiarity of results from other scientific areas, the authority of prominent scientists, or the presumed superiority of quantitative vs. verbal reasoning, âtheoryâ plays essentially no role as a foundation of the controversy. Besides underscoring the importance of strictly methodological and other non-theoretical aspects of controversies in current evolutionary biology, our analysis suggests a perspective with potential usefulness for the re-examination of more general philosophy of biology issues, such as the nature of historical inference, rationality, justification, and objectivity
- âŠ