67 research outputs found

    A Nearly Optimal Lower Bound on the Approximate Degree of AC0^0

    Full text link
    The approximate degree of a Boolean function f ⁣:{1,1}n{1,1}f \colon \{-1, 1\}^n \rightarrow \{-1, 1\} is the least degree of a real polynomial that approximates ff pointwise to error at most 1/31/3. We introduce a generic method for increasing the approximate degree of a given function, while preserving its computability by constant-depth circuits. Specifically, we show how to transform any Boolean function ff with approximate degree dd into a function FF on O(npolylog(n))O(n \cdot \operatorname{polylog}(n)) variables with approximate degree at least D=Ω(n1/3d2/3)D = \Omega(n^{1/3} \cdot d^{2/3}). In particular, if d=n1Ω(1)d= n^{1-\Omega(1)}, then DD is polynomially larger than dd. Moreover, if ff is computed by a polynomial-size Boolean circuit of constant depth, then so is FF. By recursively applying our transformation, for any constant δ>0\delta > 0 we exhibit an AC0^0 function of approximate degree Ω(n1δ)\Omega(n^{1-\delta}). This improves over the best previous lower bound of Ω(n2/3)\Omega(n^{2/3}) due to Aaronson and Shi (J. ACM 2004), and nearly matches the trivial upper bound of nn that holds for any function. Our lower bounds also apply to (quasipolynomial-size) DNFs of polylogarithmic width. We describe several applications of these results. We give: * For any constant δ>0\delta > 0, an Ω(n1δ)\Omega(n^{1-\delta}) lower bound on the quantum communication complexity of a function in AC0^0. * A Boolean function ff with approximate degree at least C(f)2o(1)C(f)^{2-o(1)}, where C(f)C(f) is the certificate complexity of ff. This separation is optimal up to the o(1)o(1) term in the exponent. * Improved secret sharing schemes with reconstruction procedures in AC0^0.Comment: 40 pages, 1 figur

    Near-Optimal Lower Bounds on the Threshold Degree and Sign-Rank of AC^0

    Full text link
    The threshold degree of a Boolean function f ⁣:{0,1}n{0,1}f\colon\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\} is the minimum degree of a real polynomial pp that represents ff in sign: sgn  p(x)=(1)f(x).\mathrm{sgn}\; p(x)=(-1)^{f(x)}. A related notion is sign-rank, defined for a Boolean matrix F=[Fij]F=[F_{ij}] as the minimum rank of a real matrix MM with sgn  Mij=(1)Fij\mathrm{sgn}\; M_{ij}=(-1)^{F_{ij}}. Determining the maximum threshold degree and sign-rank achievable by constant-depth circuits (AC0\text{AC}^{0}) is a well-known and extensively studied open problem, with complexity-theoretic and algorithmic applications. We give an essentially optimal solution to this problem. For any ϵ>0,\epsilon>0, we construct an AC0\text{AC}^{0} circuit in nn variables that has threshold degree Ω(n1ϵ)\Omega(n^{1-\epsilon}) and sign-rank exp(Ω(n1ϵ)),\exp(\Omega(n^{1-\epsilon})), improving on the previous best lower bounds of Ω(n)\Omega(\sqrt{n}) and exp(Ω~(n))\exp(\tilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{n})), respectively. Our results subsume all previous lower bounds on the threshold degree and sign-rank of AC0\text{AC}^{0} circuits of any given depth, with a strict improvement starting at depth 44. As a corollary, we also obtain near-optimal bounds on the discrepancy, threshold weight, and threshold density of AC0\text{AC}^{0}, strictly subsuming previous work on these quantities. Our work gives some of the strongest lower bounds to date on the communication complexity of AC0\text{AC}^{0}.Comment: 99 page

    Complexity Theory

    Get PDF
    Computational Complexity Theory is the mathematical study of the intrinsic power and limitations of computational resources like time, space, or randomness. The current workshop focused on recent developments in various sub-areas including arithmetic complexity, Boolean complexity, communication complexity, cryptography, probabilistic proof systems, pseudorandomness and randomness extraction. Many of the developments are related to diverse mathematical fields such as algebraic geometry, combinatorial number theory, probability theory, representation theory, and the theory of error-correcting codes

    Weighted Polynomial Approximations: Limits for Learning and Pseudorandomness

    Get PDF
    Polynomial approximations to boolean functions have led to many positive results in computer science. In particular, polynomial approximations to the sign function underly algorithms for agnostically learning halfspaces, as well as pseudorandom generators for halfspaces. In this work, we investigate the limits of these techniques by proving inapproximability results for the sign function. Firstly, the polynomial regression algorithm of Kalai et al. (SIAM J. Comput. 2008) shows that halfspaces can be learned with respect to log-concave distributions on Rn\mathbb{R}^n in the challenging agnostic learning model. The power of this algorithm relies on the fact that under log-concave distributions, halfspaces can be approximated arbitrarily well by low-degree polynomials. We ask whether this technique can be extended beyond log-concave distributions, and establish a negative result. We show that polynomials of any degree cannot approximate the sign function to within arbitrarily low error for a large class of non-log-concave distributions on the real line, including those with densities proportional to exp(x0.99)\exp(-|x|^{0.99}). Secondly, we investigate the derandomization of Chernoff-type concentration inequalities. Chernoff-type tail bounds on sums of independent random variables have pervasive applications in theoretical computer science. Schmidt et al. (SIAM J. Discrete Math. 1995) showed that these inequalities can be established for sums of random variables with only O(log(1/δ))O(\log(1/\delta))-wise independence, for a tail probability of δ\delta. We show that their results are tight up to constant factors. These results rely on techniques from weighted approximation theory, which studies how well functions on the real line can be approximated by polynomials under various distributions. We believe that these techniques will have further applications in other areas of computer science.Comment: 22 page

    Lower Bounds for the Approximate Degree of Block-Composed Functions

    Get PDF
    We describe a new hardness amplification result for point-wise approximation of Boolean functions by low-degree polynomials. Specifically, for any function f on N bits, define F(x_1,...,x_M) = OMB(f(x_1),...,f(x_M)) to be the function on M*N bits obtained by block-composing f with a function known as ODD-MAX-BIT. We show that, if f requires large degree to approximate to error 2/3 in a certain one-sided sense (captured by a complexity measure known as positive one-sided approximate degree), then F requires large degree to approximate even to error 1-2^{-M}. This generalizes a result of Beigel (Computational Complexity, 1994), who proved an identical result for the special case f=OR. Unlike related prior work, our result implies strong approximate degree lower bounds even for many functions F that have low threshold degree. Our proof is constructive: we exhibit a solution to the dual of an appropriate linear program capturing the approximate degree of any function. We describe several applications, including improved separations between the complexity classes P^{NP} and PP in both the query and communication complexity settings. Our separations improve on work of Beigel (1994) and Buhrman, Vereshchagin, and de Wolf (CCC, 2007)
    corecore