44,424 research outputs found
Abstract State Machines 1988-1998: Commented ASM Bibliography
An annotated bibliography of papers which deal with or use Abstract State
Machines (ASMs), as of January 1998.Comment: Also maintained as a BibTeX file at http://www.eecs.umich.edu/gasm
Stratified Labelings for Abstract Argumentation
We introduce stratified labelings as a novel semantical approach to abstract
argumentation frameworks. Compared to standard labelings, stratified labelings
provide a more fine-grained assessment of the controversiality of arguments
using ranks instead of the usual labels in, out, and undecided. We relate the
framework of stratified labelings to conditional logic and, in particular, to
the System Z ranking functions
A Data-Oriented Approach to Semantic Interpretation
In Data-Oriented Parsing (DOP), an annotated language corpus is used as a
stochastic grammar. The most probable analysis of a new input sentence is
constructed by combining sub-analyses from the corpus in the most probable way.
This approach has been succesfully used for syntactic analysis, using corpora
with syntactic annotations such as the Penn Treebank. If a corpus with
semantically annotated sentences is used, the same approach can also generate
the most probable semantic interpretation of an input sentence. The present
paper explains this semantic interpretation method, and summarizes the results
of a preliminary experiment. Semantic annotations were added to the syntactic
annotations of most of the sentences of the ATIS corpus. A data-oriented
semantic interpretation algorithm was succesfully tested on this semantically
enriched corpus.Comment: 10 pages, Postscript; to appear in Proceedings Workshop on
Corpus-Oriented Semantic Analysis, ECAI-96, Budapes
On embedded implicatures
The Gricean approach explains implicatures by assumptions about the pragmatics of entire utterances. The phenomenon of embedded implicatures remains a challenge for this approach since in such cases apparently implicatures contribute to the truth-conditional content of constituents smaller than utterances. In this paper, I investigate three areas where embedded implicatures seem to differ from implicatures at the utterance level: optionality, epistemic status, and implicated presuppositions. I conclude that the differences between the two kinds of implicatures justify an approach that maintains Gricean assumptions at the utterance level, and assumes a special operator for embedded implicatures
- …