925 research outputs found
A Fast Causal Profiler for Task Parallel Programs
This paper proposes TASKPROF, a profiler that identifies parallelism
bottlenecks in task parallel programs. It leverages the structure of a task
parallel execution to perform fine-grained attribution of work to various parts
of the program. TASKPROF's use of hardware performance counters to perform
fine-grained measurements minimizes perturbation. TASKPROF's profile execution
runs in parallel using multi-cores. TASKPROF's causal profile enables users to
estimate improvements in parallelism when a region of code is optimized even
when concrete optimizations are not yet known. We have used TASKPROF to isolate
parallelism bottlenecks in twenty three applications that use the Intel
Threading Building Blocks library. We have designed parallelization techniques
in five applications to in- crease parallelism by an order of magnitude using
TASKPROF. Our user study indicates that developers are able to isolate
performance bottlenecks with ease using TASKPROF.Comment: 11 page
Scaling Monte Carlo Tree Search on Intel Xeon Phi
Many algorithms have been parallelized successfully on the Intel Xeon Phi
coprocessor, especially those with regular, balanced, and predictable data
access patterns and instruction flows. Irregular and unbalanced algorithms are
harder to parallelize efficiently. They are, for instance, present in
artificial intelligence search algorithms such as Monte Carlo Tree Search
(MCTS). In this paper we study the scaling behavior of MCTS, on a highly
optimized real-world application, on real hardware. The Intel Xeon Phi allows
shared memory scaling studies up to 61 cores and 244 hardware threads. We
compare work-stealing (Cilk Plus and TBB) and work-sharing (FIFO scheduling)
approaches. Interestingly, we find that a straightforward thread pool with a
work-sharing FIFO queue shows the best performance. A crucial element for this
high performance is the controlling of the grain size, an approach that we call
Grain Size Controlled Parallel MCTS. Our subsequent comparing with the Xeon
CPUs shows an even more comprehensible distinction in performance between
different threading libraries. We achieve, to the best of our knowledge, the
fastest implementation of a parallel MCTS on the 61 core Intel Xeon Phi using a
real application (47 relative to a sequential run).Comment: 8 pages, 9 figure
Transactions Everywhere
Arguably, one of the biggest deterrants for software developers who might otherwise choose to write parallel code is that parallelism makes their lives more complicated. Perhaps the most basic problem inherent in the coordination of concurrent tasks is the enforcing of atomicity so that the partial results of one task do not inadvertently corrupt another task. Atomicity is typically enforced through locking protocols, but these protocols can introduce other complications, such as deadlock, unless restrictive methodologies in their use are adopted. We have recently begun a research project focusing on transactional memory [18] as an alternative mechanism for enforcing atomicity, since it allows the user to avoid many of the complications inherent in locking protocols. Rather than viewing transactions as infrequent occurrences in a program, as has generally been done in the past, we have adopted the point of view that all user code should execute in the context of some transaction. To make this viewpoint viable requires the development of two key technologies: effective hardware support for scalable transactional memory, and linguistic and compiler support. This paper describes our preliminary research results on making âtransactions everywhereâ a practical reality.Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA
On-the-Fly Maintenance of Series-Parallel Relationships in Fork-Join Multithreaded Programs
A key capability of data-race detectors is to determine whether one thread executes logically in parallel with another or whether the threads must operate in series. This paper provides two algorithms, one serial and one parallel, to maintain series-parallel (SP) relationships "on the fly" for fork-join multithreaded programs. The serial SP-order algorithm runs in O(1) amortized time per operation. In contrast, the previously best algorithm requires a time per operation that is proportional to Tarjanâs functional inverse of Ackermannâs function. SP-order employs an order-maintenance data structure that allows us to implement a more efficient "English-Hebrew" labeling scheme than was used in earlier race detectors, which immediately yields an improved determinacy-race detector. In particular, any fork-join program running in Tâ time on a single processor can be checked on the fly for determinacy races in O(Tâ) time. Corresponding improved bounds can also be obtained for more sophisticated data-race detectors, for example, those that use locks.
By combining SP-order with Feng and Leisersonâs serial SP-bags algorithm, we obtain a parallel SP-maintenance algorithm, called SP-hybrid. Suppose that a fork-join program has n threads, Tâ work, and a critical-path length of T[subscript â]. When executed on P processors, we prove that SP-hybrid runs in O((Tâ/P + PT[subscript â]) lg n) expected time. To understand this bound, consider that the original program obtains linear speed-up over a 1-processor execution when P = O(Tâ/T[subscript â]). In contrast, SP-hybrid obtains linear speed-up when P = O(âTâ/T[subscript â]), but the work is increased by a factor of O(lg n).Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA
Efficient and Reasonable Object-Oriented Concurrency
Making threaded programs safe and easy to reason about is one of the chief
difficulties in modern programming. This work provides an efficient execution
model for SCOOP, a concurrency approach that provides not only data race
freedom but also pre/postcondition reasoning guarantees between threads. The
extensions we propose influence both the underlying semantics to increase the
amount of concurrent execution that is possible, exclude certain classes of
deadlocks, and enable greater performance. These extensions are used as the
basis an efficient runtime and optimization pass that improve performance 15x
over a baseline implementation. This new implementation of SCOOP is also 2x
faster than other well-known safe concurrent languages. The measurements are
based on both coordination-intensive and data-manipulation-intensive benchmarks
designed to offer a mixture of workloads.Comment: Proceedings of the 10th Joint Meeting of the European Software
Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of
Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE '15). ACM, 201
- âŚ