Solving renewable energy source selection problems using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based integrated decision-making approach

This paper proposes an integrated decision-making framework for the systematic selection of a renewable energy source (RES) from a set of RESs based on sustainability attributes. A real case study of RES selection in Karnataka, India, using the framework is demonstrated, and the results are compared with state-of-the-art methods. The main reason for developing this framework is to handle uncertainty and vagueness effectively by reducing human intervention. Systematic selection of RESs also reduces inaccuracies and promotes rational decision-making. In this paper, q-rung orthopair fuzzy information is adopted to minimize subjective randomness by providing a flexible and generalized preference style. Further, the study found systematic approaches for imputing missing values, calculating attributes’ and decision-makers’ weights, aggregation or preferences, and prioritizing RESs, which are integrated into the framework. Comparing the proposed framework with state-of-the-art-methods shows that (i) biomass and solar are suitable RESs for the process under consideration in Karnataka, (ii) the proposed framework is consistent with state-of-the-art methods, (iii) the proposed framework is sufficiently stable even after weights of attributes and decision makers are altered, and (iv) the proposed framework produces broad and sensible rank values for efficient backup management. These results validate the significance of the proposed framework

Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with critic for financial risk evaluation

The financial risk evaluation is critically vital for enterprises to identify the potential financial risks, provide decision basis for financial risk management, and prevent and reduce risk losses. In the case of considering financial risk assessment, the basic problems that arise are related to strong fuzziness, ambiguity and inaccuracy. q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS), portrayed by the degrees of membership and non-membership, is a more resultful tool to seize fuzziness. In this article, the novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy score function is given for dealing the comparison problem. Later, the and operations are explored and their interesting properties are discussed. Then, the objective weights are calculated by CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation). Moreover, we present combined weights that reflects both subjective preference and objective preference. In addition, the q-rung orthopair fuzzy MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) algorithm based on CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution) is presented. Finally, the feasibility of algorithm is stated by a financial risk evaluation example with corresponding sensitivity analysis. The salient features of the proposed algorithm are that they have no counter-intuitive case and have a stronger capacity in differentiating the best alternative. First published online 03 March 202

Classical Dynamic Consensus and Opinion Dynamics Models: A Survey of Recent Trends and Methodologies

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Consensus reaching is an iterative and dynamic process that supports group decision-making models by guiding decision-makers towards modifying their opinions through a feedback mechanism. Many attempts have been recently devoted to the design of efficient consensus reaching processes, especially when the dynamism is dependent on time, which aims to deal with opinion dynamics models. The emergence of novel methodologies in this field has been accelerated over recent years. In this regard, the present work is concerned with a systematic review of classical dynamic consensus and opinion dynamics models. The most recent trends of both models are identified and the developed methodologies are described in detail. Challenges of each model and open problems are discussed and worthwhile directions for future research are given. Our findings denote that due to technological advancements, a majority of recent literature works are concerned with the large-scale group decision-making models, where the interactions of decision-makers are enabled via social networks. Managing the behavior of decision-makers and consensus reaching with the minimum adjustment cost under social network analysis have been the top priorities for researchers in the design of classical consensus and opinion dynamics models

Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making

In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic information. Then, we utilize power average and power geometric operations to develop some Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators: Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power weighted average (P2TLPWA) operator, Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power weighted geometric (P2TLPWG) operator, Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power ordered weighted average (P2TLPOWA) operator, Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power ordered weighted geometric (P2TLPOWG) operator, Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power hybrid average (P2TLPHA) operator and Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic power hybrid geometric (P2TLPHG) operator. The prominent characteristic of these proposed operators are studied. Then, we have utilized these operators to develop some approaches to solve the Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute decision making problems. Finally, a practical example for enterprise resource planning (ERP) system selection is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness

Uncertain Multi-Criteria Optimization Problems

Most real-world search and optimization problems naturally involve multiple criteria as objectives. Generally, symmetry, asymmetry, and anti-symmetry are basic characteristics of binary relationships used when modeling optimization problems. Moreover, the notion of symmetry has appeared in many articles about uncertainty theories that are employed in multi-criteria problems. Different solutions may produce trade-offs (conflicting scenarios) among different objectives. A better solution with respect to one objective may compromise other objectives. There are various factors that need to be considered to address the problems in multidisciplinary research, which is critical for the overall sustainability of human development and activity. In this regard, in recent decades, decision-making theory has been the subject of intense research activities due to its wide applications in different areas. The decision-making theory approach has become an important means to provide real-time solutions to uncertainty problems. Theories such as probability theory, fuzzy set theory, type-2 fuzzy set theory, rough set, and uncertainty theory, available in the existing literature, deal with such uncertainties. Nevertheless, the uncertain multi-criteria characteristics in such problems have not yet been explored in depth, and there is much left to be achieved in this direction. Hence, different mathematical models of real-life multi-criteria optimization problems can be developed in various uncertain frameworks with special emphasis on optimization problems

Multicriteria Consensus Models to Support Intelligent Group Decision-Making

The development of intelligent systems is progressing rapidly, thanks to advances in information technology that enable collective, automated, and effective decision-making based on information collected from diverse sources. Group decision-making (GDM) is a key part of intelligent decision-making (IDM), which has received considerable attention in recent years. IDM through GDM refers to a decision-making problem where a group of intelligent decision-makers (DMs) evaluate a set of alternatives with respect to specific attributes. Intelligent communication among DMs aims to give orders to the available alternatives. However, GDM models developed for IDM must incorporate consensus support models to effectively integrate input from each DM into the final decision. Many efforts have been made to design consensus models to support IDM, depending on the decision problem or environment. Despite promising results, significant gaps remain in research on the design of such support models. One major drawback of existing consensus models is their dependence on the type of decision environment, making them less generalizable. Moreover, these models are often static and cannot respond to dynamic changes in the decision environment. Another limitation is that consensus models for large-scale decision environments lack an efficient communication regime to enable DM interactions. To address these challenges, this dissertation proposes developing consensus models to support IDM through GDM. To address the generalization issue of existing consensus models, reinforcement learning (RL) is proposed. RL agents can be built on the Markov decision process to enable IDM, potentially removing the generalization issue of consensus support models. Contrary to most consensus models, which assume static decision environments, this dissertation proposes a computationally efficient dynamic consensus model to support dynamic IDM. Finally, to facilitate secure and efficient interactions among intelligent DMs in large-scale problems, Blockchain technology is proposed to speed up the consensus process. The proposed communication regime also includes trust-building mechanisms that employ Blockchain protocols to remove enduring and limitative assumptions on opinion similarity among agents

EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection

Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set (PDHFS) is a more powerful and important tool to describe uncertain information regarded as generalization of hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) and dual HFS (DHFS), not only reflects the hesitant attitude of decision-makers (DMs), but also reflects the probability information of DMs. Score function of fuzzy number and weighting method are very important in multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) issues. In many fuzzy environments, the score function and entropy measure have been proposed one after another. Firstly, based on the detailed analysis of the existed score function of PDHF element (PDHFE) and with the help of previous references, we build a novel score function for PDHFE. Secondly, a combined weighting method is built based on the minimum identification information principle by fusing PDHF entropy and Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method. Thirdly, a novel PDHF MAGDM approach (PDHF-EDAS) is built by extending evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) approach to the PDHF environment to solve the issue that the decision attribute information is PDHFE. Finally, the practicability and effectiveness of the PDHF MAGDM technique is verified by suppliers selection (SS) and comparing analysis with existing methods. First published online 23 January 202

Fuzzy Techniques for Decision Making 2018

Zadeh's fuzzy set theory incorporates the impreciseness of data and evaluations, by imputting the degrees by which each object belongs to a set. Its success fostered theories that codify the subjectivity, uncertainty, imprecision, or roughness of the evaluations. Their rationale is to produce new flexible methodologies in order to model a variety of concrete decision problems more realistically. This Special Issue garners contributions addressing novel tools, techniques and methodologies for decision making (inclusive of both individual and group, single- or multi-criteria decision making) in the context of these theories. It contains 38 research articles that contribute to a variety of setups that combine fuzziness, hesitancy, roughness, covering sets, and linguistic approaches. Their ranges vary from fundamental or technical to applied approaches

Multiple-Criteria Decision Making

Decision-making on real-world problems, including individual process decisions, requires an appropriate and reliable decision support system. Fuzzy set theory, rough set theory, and neutrosophic set theory, which are MCDM techniques, are useful for modeling complex decision-making problems with imprecise, ambiguous, or vague data.This Special Issue, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, aims to incorporate recent developments in the area of the multi-criteria decision-making field. Topics include, but are not limited to:- MCDM optimization in engineering;- Environmental sustainability in engineering processes;- Multi-criteria production and logistics process planning;- New trends in multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable processes;- Multi-criteria decision making in strategic management based on sustainable criteria