83,109 research outputs found
Taxonomy for Humans or Computers? Cognitive Pragmatics for Big Data
Criticism of big data has focused on showing that more is not necessarily better, in the sense that data may lose their value when taken out of context and aggregated together. The next step is to incorporate an awareness of pitfalls for aggregation into the design of data infrastructure and institutions. A common strategy minimizes aggregation errors by increasing the precision of our conventions for identifying and classifying data. As a counterpoint, we argue that there are pragmatic trade-offs between precision and ambiguity that are key to designing effective solutions for generating big data about biodiversity. We focus on the importance of theory-dependence as a source of ambiguity in taxonomic nomenclature and hence a persistent challenge for implementing a single, long-term solution to storing and accessing meaningful sets of biological specimens. We argue that ambiguity does have a positive role to play in scientific progress as a tool for efficiently symbolizing multiple aspects of taxa and mediating between conflicting hypotheses about their nature. Pursuing a deeper understanding of the trade-offs and synthesis of precision and ambiguity as virtues of scientific language and communication systems then offers a productive next step for realizing sound, big biodiversity data services
Insights into neutralization of animal viruses gained from study of influenza virus
It has long been known that the binding of antibodies to viruses can result in a loss of infectivity, or neutralization, but little is understood of the mechanism or mechanisms of this process. This is probably because neutralization is a multifactorial phenomenon depending upon the nature of the virus itself, the particular antigenic site involved, the isotype of immunoglobulin and the ratio of virus to immunoglobulin (see below). Thus not only is it likely that neutralization of one virus will differ from another but that changing the circumstances of neutralization can change the mechanism itself. To give coherence to the topic we are concentrating this review on one virus, influenza type A which is itself well studied and reasonably well understood [1–3]. Reviews of the older literature can be found in references 4 to 7
Bag-Level Aggregation for Multiple Instance Active Learning in Instance Classification Problems
A growing number of applications, e.g. video surveillance and medical image
analysis, require training recognition systems from large amounts of weakly
annotated data while some targeted interactions with a domain expert are
allowed to improve the training process. In such cases, active learning (AL)
can reduce labeling costs for training a classifier by querying the expert to
provide the labels of most informative instances. This paper focuses on AL
methods for instance classification problems in multiple instance learning
(MIL), where data is arranged into sets, called bags, that are weakly labeled.
Most AL methods focus on single instance learning problems. These methods are
not suitable for MIL problems because they cannot account for the bag structure
of data. In this paper, new methods for bag-level aggregation of instance
informativeness are proposed for multiple instance active learning (MIAL). The
\textit{aggregated informativeness} method identifies the most informative
instances based on classifier uncertainty, and queries bags incorporating the
most information. The other proposed method, called \textit{cluster-based
aggregative sampling}, clusters data hierarchically in the instance space. The
informativeness of instances is assessed by considering bag labels, inferred
instance labels, and the proportion of labels that remain to be discovered in
clusters. Both proposed methods significantly outperform reference methods in
extensive experiments using benchmark data from several application domains.
Results indicate that using an appropriate strategy to address MIAL problems
yields a significant reduction in the number of queries needed to achieve the
same level of performance as single instance AL methods
Joint perceptual decision-making: a case study in explanatory pluralism.
Traditionally different approaches to the study of cognition have been viewed as competing explanatory frameworks. An alternative view, explanatory pluralism, regards different approaches to the study of cognition as complementary ways of studying the same phenomenon, at specific temporal and spatial scales, using appropriate methodological tools. Explanatory pluralism has been often described abstractly, but has rarely been applied to concrete cases. We present a case study of explanatory pluralism. We discuss three separate ways of studying the same phenomenon: a perceptual decision-making task (Bahrami et al., 2010), where pairs of subjects share information to jointly individuate an oddball stimulus among a set of distractors. Each approach analyzed the same corpus but targeted different units of analysis at different levels of description: decision-making at the behavioral level, confidence sharing at the linguistic level, and acoustic energy at the physical level. We discuss the utility of explanatory pluralism for describing this complex, multiscale phenomenon, show ways in which this case study sheds new light on the concept of pluralism, and highlight good practices to critically assess and complement approaches
- …