141 research outputs found
Neuroimaging in epilepsy
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epilepsy neuroimaging is important for detecting the seizure onset zone, predicting and preventing deficits from surgery and illuminating mechanisms of epileptogenesis. An aspiration is to integrate imaging and genetic biomarkers to enable personalized epilepsy treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: The ability to detect lesions, particularly focal cortical dysplasia and hippocampal sclerosis, is increased using ultra high-field imaging and postprocessing techniques such as automated volumetry, T2 relaxometry, voxel-based morphometry and surface-based techniques. Statistical analysis of PET and single photon emission computer tomography (STATISCOM) are superior to qualitative analysis alone in identifying focal abnormalities in MRI-negative patients. These methods have also been used to study mechanisms of epileptogenesis and pharmacoresistance. Recent language fMRI studies aim to localize, and also lateralize language functions. Memory fMRI has been recommended to lateralize mnemonic function and predict outcome after surgery in temporal lobe epilepsy. SUMMARY: Combinations of structural, functional and post-processing methods have been used in multimodal and machine learning models to improve the identification of the seizure onset zone and increase understanding of mechanisms underlying structural and functional aberrations in epilepsy
The Value of Seizure Semiology in Epilepsy Surgery: Epileptogenic-Zone Localisation in Presurgical Patients using Machine Learning and Semiology Visualisation Tool
Background
Eight million individuals have focal drug resistant epilepsy worldwide. If their epileptogenic focus is identified and resected, they may become seizure-free and experience significant improvements in quality of life. However, seizure-freedom occurs in less than half of surgical resections.
Seizure semiology - the signs and symptoms during a seizure - along with brain imaging and electroencephalography (EEG) are amongst the mainstays of seizure localisation. Although there have been advances in algorithmic identification of abnormalities on EEG and imaging, semiological analysis has remained more subjective.
The primary objective of this research was to investigate the localising value of clinician-identified semiology, and secondarily to improve personalised prognostication for epilepsy surgery.
Methods
I data mined retrospective hospital records to link semiology to outcomes. I trained machine learning models to predict temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and determine the value of semiology compared to a benchmark of hippocampal sclerosis (HS).
Due to the hospital dataset being relatively small, we also collected data from a systematic review of the literature to curate an open-access Semio2Brain database. We built the Semiology-to-Brain Visualisation Tool (SVT) on this database and retrospectively validated SVT in two separate groups of randomly selected patients and individuals with frontal lobe epilepsy.
Separately, a systematic review of multimodal prognostic features of epilepsy surgery was undertaken.
The concept of a semiological connectome was devised and compared to structural connectivity to investigate probabilistic propagation and semiology generation.
Results
Although a (non-chronological) list of patients’ semiologies did not improve localisation beyond the initial semiology, the list of semiology added value when combined with an imaging feature. The absolute added value of semiology in a support vector classifier in diagnosing TLE, compared to HS, was 25%. Semiology was however unable to predict postsurgical outcomes. To help future prognostic models, a list of essential multimodal prognostic features for epilepsy surgery were extracted from meta-analyses and a structural causal model proposed.
Semio2Brain consists of over 13000 semiological datapoints from 4643 patients across 309 studies and uniquely enabled a Bayesian approach to localisation to mitigate TLE publication bias. SVT performed well in a retrospective validation, matching the best expert clinician’s localisation scores and exceeding them for lateralisation, and showed modest value in localisation in individuals with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE).
There was a significant correlation between the number of connecting fibres between brain regions and the seizure semiologies that can arise from these regions.
Conclusions
Semiology is valuable in localisation, but multimodal concordance is more valuable and highly prognostic. SVT could be suitable for use in multimodal models to predict the seizure focus
The impact of epilepsy surgery on the structural connectome and its relation to outcome
BACKGROUND:
Temporal lobe surgical resection brings seizure remission in up to 80% of patients, with long-term complete seizure freedom in 41%. However, it is unclear how surgery impacts on the structural white matter network, and how the network changes relate to seizure outcome.
METHODS:
We used white matter fibre tractography on preoperative diffusion MRI to generate a structural white matter network, and postoperative T1-weighted MRI to retrospectively infer the impact of surgical resection on this network. We then applied graph theory and machine learning to investigate the properties of change between the preoperative and predicted postoperative networks.
RESULTS:
Temporal lobe surgery had a modest impact on global network efficiency, despite the disruption caused. This was due to alternative shortest paths in the network leading to widespread increases in betweenness centrality post-surgery. Measurements of network change could retrospectively predict seizure outcomes with 79% accuracy and 65% specificity, which is twice as high as the empirical distribution. Fifteen connections which changed due to surgery were identified as useful for prediction of outcome, eight of which connected to the ipsilateral temporal pole.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our results suggest that the use of network change metrics may have clinical value for predicting seizure outcome. This approach could be used to prospectively predict outcomes given a suggested resection mask using preoperative data only
Complementary structural and functional abnormalities to localise epileptogenic tissue
When investigating suitability for surgery, people with drug-refractory focal
epilepsy may have intracranial EEG (iEEG) electrodes implanted to localise
seizure onset. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) may be
acquired to identify key white matter tracts for surgical avoidance. Here, we
investigate whether structural connectivity abnormalities, inferred from dMRI,
may be used in conjunction with functional iEEG abnormalities to aid
localisation and resection of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and improve surgical
outcomes in epilepsy.
We retrospectively investigated data from 43 patients with epilepsy who had
surgery following iEEG. Twenty five patients (58%) were free from disabling
seizures (ILAE 1 or 2) at one year. For all patients, T1-weighted and
diffusion-weighted MRIs were acquired prior to iEEG implantation. Interictal
iEEG functional, and dMRI structural connectivity abnormalities were quantified
by comparison to a normative map and healthy controls respectively.
First, we explored whether the resection of maximal (dMRI and iEEG)
abnormalities related to improved surgical outcomes. Second, we investigated
whether the modalities provided complementary information for improved
prediction of surgical outcome. Third, we suggest how dMRI abnormalities may be
useful to inform the placement of iEEG electrodes as part of the pre-surgical
evaluation using a patient case study.
Seizure freedom was 15 times more likely in those patients with resection of
maximal dMRI and iEEG abnormalities (p=0.008). Both modalities were separately
able to distinguish patient outcome groups and when combined, a decision tree
correctly separated 36 out of 43 (84%) patients based on surgical outcome.
Structural dMRI could be used in pre-surgical evaluations, particularly when
localisation of the EZ is uncertain, to inform personalised iEEG implantation
and resection.Comment: 5 figure
Recommended from our members
The white matter connectome as an individualized biomarker of language impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy.
ObjectiveThe distributed white matter network underlying language leads to difficulties in extracting clinically meaningful summaries of neural alterations leading to language impairment. Here we determine the predictive ability of the structural connectome (SC), compared with global measures of white matter tract microstructure and clinical data, to discriminate language impaired patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) from TLE patients without language impairment.MethodsT1- and diffusion-MRI, clinical variables (CVs), and neuropsychological measures of naming and verbal fluency were available for 82 TLE patients. Prediction of language impairment was performed using a robust tree-based classifier (XGBoost) for three models: (1) a CV-model which included demographic and epilepsy-related clinical features, (2) an atlas-based tract-model, including four frontotemporal white matter association tracts implicated in language (i.e., the bilateral arcuate fasciculus, inferior frontal occipital fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and uncinate fasciculus), and (3) a SC-model based on diffusion MRI. For the association tracts, mean fractional anisotropy was calculated as a measure of white matter microstructure for each tract using a diffusion tensor atlas (i.e., AtlasTrack). The SC-model used measurement of cortical-cortical connections arising from a temporal lobe subnetwork derived using probabilistic tractography. Dimensionality reduction of the SC was performed with principal components analysis (PCA). Each model was trained on 49 patients from one epilepsy center and tested on 33 patients from a different center (i.e., an independent dataset). Randomization was performed to test the stability of the results.ResultsThe SC-model yielded a greater area under the curve (AUC; .73) and accuracy (79%) compared to both the tract-model (AUC: .54, p < .001; accuracy: 70%, p < .001) and the CV-model (AUC: .59, p < .001; accuracy: 64%, p < .001). Within the SC-model, lateral temporal connections had the highest importance to model performance, including connections similar to language association tracts such as links between the superior temporal gyrus to pars opercularis. However, in addition to these connections many additional connections that were widely distributed, bilateral and interhemispheric in nature were identified as contributing to SC-model performance.ConclusionThe SC revealed a white matter network contributing to language impairment that was widely distributed, bilateral, and lateral temporal in nature. The distributed network underlying language may be why the SC-model has an advantage in identifying sub-components of the complex fiber networks most relevant for aspects of language performance
Clinical Application of Machine Learning Models for Brain Imaging in Epilepsy: A Review
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent and disabling seizures. An increasing number of clinical and experimental applications of machine learning (ML) methods for epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders are available. ML methods have the potential to provide a reliable and optimal performance for clinical diagnoses, prediction, and personalized medicine by using mathematical algorithms and computational approaches. There are now several applications of ML for epilepsy, including neuroimaging analyses. For precise and reliable clinical applications in epilepsy and neuroimaging, the diverse ML methodologies should be examined and validated. We review the clinical applications of ML models for brain imaging in epilepsy obtained from a PubMed database search in February 2021. We first present an overview of typical neuroimaging modalities and ML models used in the epilepsy studies and then focus on the existing applications of ML models for brain imaging in epilepsy based on the following clinical aspects: (i) distinguishing individuals with epilepsy from healthy controls, (ii) lateralization of the temporal lobe epilepsy focus, (iii) the identification of epileptogenic foci, (iv) the prediction of clinical outcomes, and (v) brain-age prediction. We address the practical problems and challenges described in the literature and suggest some future research directions
Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated the feasibility and potential benefits of incorporating deep-learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into planning stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation in pediatric patients with diagnostically complex drug-resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to assess the degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and the seizure onset zone (SOZ) as assessed by sEEG. METHODS: A neural network classifier was applied to cortical features from MRI data from three cohorts. (1) The network was trained and cross-validated using 34 patients with visible focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs). (2) Specificity was assessed in 20 pediatric healthy controls. (3) Feasibility of incorporation into sEEG implantation plans was evaluated in 34 sEEG patients. Coordinates of sEEG contacts were coregistered with classifier-predicted lesions. sEEG contacts in seizure onset and irritative tissue were identified by clinical neurophysiologists. A distance of <10Â mm between SOZ contacts and classifier-predicted lesions was considered colocalization. RESULTS: In patients with radiologically defined lesions, classifier sensitivity was 74% (25/34 lesions detected). No clusters were detected in the controls (specificity = 100%). Of the total 34 sEEG patients, 21 patients had a focal cortical SOZ, of whom eight were histopathologically confirmed as having an FCD. The algorithm correctly detected seven of eight of these FCDs (86%). In patients with histopathologically heterogeneous focal cortical lesions, there was colocalization between classifier output and SOZ contacts in 62%. In three patients, the electroclinical profile was indicative of focal epilepsy, but no SOZ was localized on sEEG. In these patients, the classifier identified additional abnormalities that had not been implanted. SIGNIFICANCE: There was a high degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and sEEG. We have created a framework for incorporation of deep-learning-based MRI lesion detection into sEEG implantation planning. Our findings support the prospective evaluation of automated MRI analysis to plan optimal electrode trajectories
Multimodal prognostic features of seizure freedom in epilepsy surgery
Objective: Accurate preoperative predictions of seizure freedom following surgery for focal drug resistant epilepsy remain elusive. Our objective was to systematically evaluate all meta-analyses of epilepsy surgery with seizure freedom as the primary outcome, to identify clinical features that are consistently prognostic and should be included in the future models.
Methods: We searched PubMed and Cochrane using free-text and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. This study was registered on PROSPERO. We classified features as prognostic, non-prognostic and uncertain and into seven subcategories: ‘clinical’, ‘imaging’, ‘neurophysiology’, ‘multimodal concordance’, ‘genetic’, ‘surgical technique’ and ‘pathology’. We propose a structural causal model based on these features.
Results: We found 46 features from 38 meta-analyses over 22 years. The following were consistently prognostic across meta-analyses: febrile convulsions, hippocampal sclerosis, focal abnormal MRI, Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) coregistered to MRI, focal ictal/interictal EEG, EEG-MRI concordance, temporal lobe resections, complete excision, histopathological lesions, tumours and focal cortical dysplasia type IIb. Severe learning disability was predictive of poor prognosis. Others, including sex and side of resection, were non-prognostic. There were limited meta-analyses investigating genetic contributions, structural connectivity or multimodal concordance and few adjusted for known confounders or performed corrections for multiple comparisons.
Significance: Seizure-free outcomes have not improved over decades of epilepsy surgery and despite a multitude of models, none prognosticate accurately. Our list of multimodal population-invariant prognostic features and proposed structural causal model may serve as an objective foundation for statistical adjustments of plausible confounders for use in high-dimensional models
- …