Target Fishing: A Single-Label or Multi-Label Problem?

According to Cobanoglu et al and Murphy, it is now widely acknowledged that the single target paradigm (one protein or target, one disease, one drug) that has been the dominant premise in drug development in the recent past is untenable. More often than not, a drug-like compound (ligand) can be promiscuous - that is, it can interact with more than one target protein. In recent years, in in silico target prediction methods the promiscuity issue has been approached computationally in different ways. In this study we confine attention to the so-called ligand-based target prediction machine learning approaches, commonly referred to as target-fishing. With a few exceptions, the target-fishing approaches that are currently ubiquitous in cheminformatics literature can be essentially viewed as single-label multi-classification schemes; these approaches inherently bank on the single target paradigm assumption that a ligand can home in on one specific target. In order to address the ligand promiscuity issue, one might be able to cast target-fishing as a multi-label multi-class classification problem. For illustrative and comparison purposes, single-label and multi-label Naive Bayes classification models (denoted here by SMM and MMM, respectively) for target-fishing were implemented. The models were constructed and tested on 65,587 compounds and 308 targets retrieved from the ChEMBL17 database. SMM and MMM performed differently: for 16,344 test compounds, the MMM model returned recall and precision values of 0.8058 and 0.6622, respectively; the corresponding recall and precision values yielded by the SMM model were 0.7805 and 0.7596, respectively. However, at a significance level of 0.05 and one degree of freedom McNemar test performed on the target prediction results returned by SMM and MMM for the 16,344 test ligands gave a chi-squared value of 15.656, in favour of the MMM approach

Enhancing Reaction-based de novo Design using Machine Learning

De novo design is a branch of chemoinformatics that is concerned with the rational design of molecular structures with desired properties, which specifically aims at achieving suitable pharmacological and safety profiles when applied to drug design. Scoring, construction, and search methods are the main components that are exploited by de novo design programs to explore the chemical space to encourage the cost-effective design of new chemical entities. In particular, construction methods are concerned with providing strategies for compound generation to address issues such as drug-likeness and synthetic accessibility. Reaction-based de novo design consists of combining building blocks according to transformation rules that are extracted from collections of known reactions, intending to restrict the enumerated chemical space into a manageable number of synthetically accessible structures. The reaction vector is an example of a representation that encodes topological changes occurring in reactions, which has been integrated within a structure generation algorithm to increase the chances of generating molecules that are synthesisable. The general aim of this study was to enhance reaction-based de novo design by developing machine learning approaches that exploit publicly available data on reactions. A series of algorithms for reaction standardisation, fingerprinting, and reaction vector database validation were introduced and applied to generate new data on which the entirety of this work relies. First, these collections were applied to the validation of a new ligand-based design tool. The tool was then used in a case study to design compounds which were eventually synthesised using very similar procedures to those suggested by the structure generator. A reaction classification model and a novel hierarchical labelling system were then developed to introduce the possibility of applying transformations by class. The model was augmented with an algorithm for confidence estimation, and was used to classify two datasets from industry and the literature. Results from the classification suggest that the model can be used effectively to gain insights on the nature of reaction collections. Classified reactions were further processed to build a reaction class recommendation model capable of suggesting appropriate reaction classes to apply to molecules according to their fingerprints. The model was validated, then integrated within the reaction vector-based design framework, which was assessed on its performance against the baseline algorithm. Results from the de novo design experiments indicate that the use of the recommendation model leads to a higher synthetic accessibility and a more efficient management of computational resources