Machine Learning for Multiclass Classification and Prediction of Alzheimer\u27s Disease

Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) is an irreversible neurodegenerative disorder and a common form of dementia. This research aims to develop machine learning algorithms that diagnose and predict the progression of AD from multimodal heterogonous biomarkers with a focus placed on the early diagnosis. To meet this goal, several machine learning-based methods with their unique characteristics for feature extraction and automated classification, prediction, and visualization have been developed to discern subtle progression trends and predict the trajectory of disease progression. The methodology envisioned aims to enhance both the multiclass classification accuracy and prediction outcomes by effectively modeling the interplay between the multimodal biomarkers, handle the missing data challenge, and adequately extract all the relevant features that will be fed into the machine learning framework, all in order to understand the subtle changes that happen in the different stages of the disease. This research will also investigate the notion of multitasking to discover how the two processes of multiclass classification and prediction relate to one another in terms of the features they share and whether they could learn from one another for optimizing multiclass classification and prediction accuracy. This research work also delves into predicting cognitive scores of specific tests over time, using multimodal longitudinal data. The intent is to augment our prospects for analyzing the interplay between the different multimodal features used in the input space to the predicted cognitive scores. Moreover, the power of modality fusion, kernelization, and tensorization have also been investigated to efficiently extract important features hidden in the lower-dimensional feature space without being distracted by those deemed as irrelevant. With the adage that a picture is worth a thousand words, this dissertation introduces a unique color-coded visualization system with a fully integrated machine learning model for the enhanced diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer\u27s disease. The incentive here is to show that through visualization, the challenges imposed by both the variability and interrelatedness of the multimodal features could be overcome. Ultimately, this form of visualization via machine learning informs on the challenges faced with multiclass classification and adds insight into the decision-making process for a diagnosis and prognosis

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Semantic Memory as a Presymptomatic Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk

Extensive research efforts have been directed toward strategies for predicting risk of developing Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) prior to the appearance of observable symptoms. Existing approaches for early detection of AD vary in terms of their efficacy, invasiveness, and ease of implementation. Several non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging strategies have been developed for predicting decline in cognitively healthy older adults. This review will survey a number of studies, beginning with the development of a famous name discrimination task used to identify neural regions that participate in semantic memory retrieval and to test predictions of several key theories of the role of the hippocampus in memory. This task has revealed medial temporal and neocortical contributions to recent and remote memory retrieval, and it has been used to demonstrate compensatory neural recruitment in older adults, apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers, and amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients. Recently, we have also found that the famous name discrimination task provides predictive value for forecasting episodic memory decline among asymptomatic older adults. Other studies investigating the predictive value of semantic memory tasks will also be presented. We suggest several advantages associated with the use of semantic processing tasks, particularly those based on person identification, in comparison to episodic memory tasks to study AD risk. Future directions for research and potential clinical uses of semantic memory paradigms are also discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Imaging Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative disease

Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Neurodegenerative disease Incidence in the Females of 60-96 year Age Group

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia are gradually becoming more prevalent chronic diseases, characterized by the decline in cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Machine learning is revolu-tionising almost all domains of our life, including the clinical system. The application of machine learning has the potential to enormously augment the reach of neurodegenerative care thus building it more proficient. Throughout the globe, there is a massive burden of Alzheimer's and demen-tia cases; which denotes an exclusive set of difficulties. This provides us with an exceptional opportunity in terms of the impending convenience of data. Harnessing this data using machine learning tools and techniques, can put scientists and physicians in the lead research position in this area. The ob-jective of this study was to develop an efficient prognostic ML model with high-performance metrics to better identify female candidate subjects at risk of having Alzheimer's disease and dementia. The study was based on two diverse datasets. The results have been discussed employing seven perfor-mance evaluation measures i.e. accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure, Re-ceiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) area, Kappa statistic, and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Also, a comprehensive performance analysis has been carried out later in the study

Explainable tensor multi-task ensemble learning based on brain structure variation for Alzheimer's disease dynamic prediction

Objective: Machine learning approaches for predicting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression can substantially assist researchers and clinicians in developing effective AD preventive and treatment strategies. Methods: This study proposes a novel machine learning algorithm to predict the AD progression utilising a multi-task ensemble learning approach. Specifically, we present a novel tensor multi-task learning (MTL) algorithm based on similarity measurement of spatio-temporal variability of brain biomarkers to model AD progression. In this model, the prediction of each patient sample in the tensor is set as one task, where all tasks share a set of latent factors obtained through tensor decomposition. Furthermore, as subjects have continuous records of brain biomarker testing, the model is extended to ensemble the subjects’ temporally continuous prediction results utilising a gradient boosting kernel to find more accurate predictions. Results: We have conducted extensive experiments utilising data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm and model. Results demonstrate that the proposed model have superior accuracy and stability in predicting AD progression compared to benchmarks and state-of-the-art multi-task regression methods in terms of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire and The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) cognitive scores. Conclusion: Brain biomarker correlation information can be utilised to identify variations in individual brain structures and the model can be utilised to effectively predict the progression of AD with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and cognitive scores of AD patients at different stages

IMPACT OF SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE COMPLAINTS ON MCI DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA IN ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most commonly occurring neurodegenerative disease characterized by deficits in patient cognition. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as an intermediate stage between cognitively normal (CN) and dementia in which the individual experiences some impairment but can function independently. Gold standard MCI criteria requires a subjective cognitive complaint (SCC) in which a patient acknowledges a decline in cognitive ability, however past findings on its validity as a measure of objective impairment have been inconsistent. Biomarkers found in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and indicative of neurodegeneration are also used to examine AD progression. Our study investigates if inclusion of SCC in MCI criteria improves prediction of cognitive decline over time and/or affects levels of CSF biomarkers in AD patients. This is a secondary analysis using data from the Alzheimer’s Data Neuroimaging Initiative. Participants completed a battery of neurocognitive assessments and were assigned into one of 3 groups based first on MCI gold standard criteria by Petersen (2004), then on newer proposed MCI criteria by Jak-Bondi (2014): CN, MCI without SCC, or MCI with SCC. CSF biomarkers amyloid beta (AB), tau, and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) were also collected via a lumbar puncture. Multilevel modeling was used to examine whether cognitive decline along with CSF biomarker levels differed longitudinally among the 3 groups. There were no significant main effects or longitudinal differences between those with and without SCC in global cognition score or CSF biomarker ratio levels. These findings demonstrate the inclusion of SCC in MCI criteria does not make a meaningful difference in objective performance or biomarkers of neurodegeneration

Supervised machine learning in psychiatry:towards application in clinical practice

In recent years, the field of machine learning (often named with the more general term artificial intelligence) has literally exploded and its application has been proposed in basically all fields, including psychiatry and mental health. This has been motivated by the promise of using machine learning to develop new clinical tools that could help perform personalized predictions and recommendations, ultimately improving the results achievable in the psychiatric clinical practice that still faces only a limited success in the fight against mental diseases. However, despite this huge interest, there is still a substantial lack of tools in psychiatry that are based on machine learning algorithms. Massimiliano Grassi, in his Ph.D. thesis, investigates the challenges of translating machine learning algorithms into clinical practice and proposes innovative solutions to these challenges. The thesis presents the development and validation of new algorithms for the prediction of the onset of Alzheimer’s disease, the remission of obsessive-compulsive disorder, and the automatization of sleep staging in polysomnography, a method to diagnose sleep disorders. The results from these studies demonstrate that the use of machine learning in psychiatric clinical practice is not just a promise, and it is possible to develop machine learning algorithms that achieve clinically relevant performance even if based solely on information that can be easily accessible in the daily clinical routine

Predicting Cognitive Decline in Older Adults Through Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis

Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is associated with cognitive and structural decline beyond what is seen in normal, healthy aging. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research indicates that prior to the onset of measureable cognitive impairment, individuals at-risk for AD demonstrate different patterns of neural activation than individuals at lower risk. Thus, differences in task-activated fMRI may be beneficial in predicting cognitive decline at a pre-symptomatic stage. The present study utilizes multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) of baseline fMRI task-related activation to predict cognitive decline, with the hypothesis that famous and non-famous name task activation will discriminate older adults who go on to experience cognitive decline from those who do not. Ninety-nine cognitively intact older adults underwent neuropsychological testing and a semantic memory fMRI task (famous name discrimination). After follow-up neuropsychological testing 18-months later, participants were grouped as Stable (n = 65) or Declining (n = 34) based on \u3e 1.0 SD decline in performance on cognitive measures. MVPA classification accuracy was 90% for stimulus type (famous and non-famous names), thereby supporting the general approach. Mean MVPA classification accuracy for famous and non-famous names was 83% for both the Stable and Declining groups. Finally, MVPA produced greater than chance classification accuracy of participant groups for both famous name activation (56%) and non-famous name activation (55%) as determined via binomial distribution. The results of the current study suggest that MVPA possesses potential in predicting cognitive decline in older adults

MODELING DEMENTIA RISK, COGNITIVE CHANGE, PREDICTIVE RULES IN LONGITUDINAL STUDIES

Dementia is increasing recognized as a major problem to public health worldwide. Prevention and treatment strategies are in critical need. Nowadays, research for dementia usually featured as complex longitudinal studies, which provide extensive information and also propose challenge to statistical methodology. The purpose of this dissertation research was to apply statistical methodology in the field of dementia to strengthen the understanding of dementia from three perspectives: 1) Application of statistical methodology to investigate the association between potential risk factors and incident dementia. 2) Application of statistical methodology to analyze changes over time, or trajectory, in cognitive tests and symptoms. 3) Application of statistical learning methods to predict development of dementia in the future. Prevention of Alzheimer’s disease with Vitamin E and Selenium (PREADViSE) (7547 subjects included) and Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (591 participants included) were used in this dissertation. The first study, “Self-reported sleep apnea and dementia risk: Findings from the PREADViSE Alzheimer’s disease prevention trial ”, shows that self-reported baseline history of sleep apnea was borderline significantly associated with risk of dementia after adjustment for confounding. Stratified analysis by APOE ε4 carrier status showed that baseline history of sleep apnea was associated with significantly increased risk of dementia in APOE ε4 non-carriers. The second study, “comparison of trajectories of episodic memory for over 10 years between baseline normal and MCI ADNI subjects,” shows that estimated 30% normal subjects at baseline assigned to group 3 and 6 stay stable for over 9 years, and normal subjects at baseline assigned to Group 1 (18.18%) and Group 5 (16.67%) were more likely to develop into dementia. In contrast to groups identified for normal subjects, all trajectory groups for MCI subjects at baseline showed the tendency to decline. The third study, “comparison between neural network and logistic regression in PREADViSE trial,” demonstrates that neural network has slightly better predictive performance than logistic regression, and also it can reveal complex relationships among covariates. In third study, the effect of years of education on response variable depends on years of age, status of APOE ɛ4 allele and memory change

Neuropsychological predictors of the outcome in non-demented subjects with cognitive complaints

Tese de doutoramento, Ciências Biomédicas (Neurociências), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina, 2012Nowadays, life expectancy has increased and gradually the prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders in the aging population began to represent a major public health problem. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common dementia and affects millions of older adults. Despite recent advances in the knowledge of AD biomarkers of pathophysiological processes, clearly the phenotype remains aetiologically heterogeneous. Understanding the clinical phenotype variation contingent to the neuropathological progression is crucial to provide intervention in the earliest phases of neurodegeneration. Newly research biomarkers have been proposed for early diagnosis of AD, however cognitive impairment remains a prominent and early feature of AD. Neuropsychological markers could offer a relatively inexpensive and noninvasive indicator of future progression to dementia because biological markers are expensive, some of them only available at few specialized centers, and, in the case of lumbar puncture, invasive. Therefore, it would not be reasonable to offer the newer and expensive biomarker techniques to all patients with cognitive complaints. Importantly, new treatments of disease modification approach require the selection of those patients with higher risk of conversion to dementia. Thus, the main goal of the present thesis was to improve the predictive value of neuropsychological measures to future conversion to dementia of patients presenting with cognitive complaints who do not fulfil the dementia criteria. Four steps were conducted in order to reach that main goal: 1. º Original published articles reporting values of sensitivity, specificity and effect sizes for neuropsychological tests to predict conversion to dementia in patients at risk of future cognitive decline were analysed in a systematic review of literature. Twenty-four studies published in the last 20 years were selected. Neuropsychological tests administered vary considerably among studies, yet the battery of tests applied generally assessed verbal memory performances, and many included also cognitive areas such as executive functions, attention and language. Methodological constrains limited the ability to provide reasonable predictive values; some studies have reported rather disparate global sensitivity and specificity rates for the neuropsychological tests to predict conversion to dementia. Conversely, other studies reported high and balanced sensitivity/specificity ratios (≥80%), mainly for verbal episodic memory tests, however the follow-up period of those studies was generally short (≈2 years). Certainly, it would be important to achieve a consensus according to the more feasible and accurate neuropsychological tests to administer for the assessment of patients at risk of conversion to dementia. On the other hand, cohort studies with longer follow-up periods would be important to propose neuropsychological tests with higher predictive accuracy and clinical relevance regarding conversion to dementia. 2. º Newer statistical classification methods derived from data mining and machine learning methods were applied to improve accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of predictors obtained from neuropsychological testing. Data used to perform the comparison of classification methods was extracted from a cohort study (CCC – Cognitive Complaints Cohort) with 775 elderly non-demented patients with cognitive complaints referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Seven non-parametric classifiers derived from data mining methods (Multilayer Perceptrons Neural Networks, Radial Basis Function Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, CART, CHAID and QUEST Classification Trees and Random Forests) were compared to three traditional classifiers (Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression) in terms of overall classification accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, Area under the ROC curve and Press’Q. Model predictors were 10 neuropsychological tests currently used in the diagnosis of dementia. Comparison of classifiers highlighted three methods more adequate to study the predictive value of neuropsychological tests in longitudinal clinical cohort studies. Support Vector Machines demonstrated the larger overall classification accuracy (Median (Me) = 0.76) and area under the ROC (Me =0.90). However, this method showed high specificity (Me = 1.0) but very low sensitivity (Me = 0.3). Random Forests ranked second in overall accuracy (Me = 0.73) with high area under the ROC (Me = 0.73), specificity (Me = 0.73) and sensitivity (Me = 0.64). Linear Discriminant Analysis also showed acceptable overall accuracy (Me = 0.66), with acceptable area under the ROC (Me = 0.72), specificity (Me = 0.66) and sensitivity (Me = 0.64). Results indicated the innovative data mining method of Random Forests, along with more traditional methods, namely the Linear Discriminant Analysis, should be the option in cohort studies of neuropsychological predictors of future dementia. 3. º Verbal memory is one of the first cognitive areas to decline, therefore, the predictive value of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) for the conversion to dementia when using four different verbal memory tests (Logical Memory, LM; California Verbal Learning Test, CVLT; Verbal Paired-Associate Learning, VPAL; and Digit Span, DS) was analysed. Participants were consecutive patients with subjective cognitive complaints who performed a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation and were not demented, observed in a memory clinic setting. At baseline, 272 patients from CCC reporting subjective cognitive complaints and not demented were included. During the follow-up time (3.0±1.9 years), 58 patients converted to dementia, and 214 did not. Statistically significant differences between the converters and non-converters were present in LM, VPAL and CVLT. A multivariate Cox regression analysis combining the 4 memory tests revealed that only the CVLT test remained significant as predictor of conversion to dementia. Non-demented patients with cognitive complaints diagnosed as MCI according to abnormal (< 1.5 SD) learning in the CVLT test had 3.6 higher risk of becoming demented in the follow-up. As so, the verbal memory assessment using the CVLT should be preferred in the diagnostic criteria of MCI for a more accurate prediction of conversion to dementia. 4. º The predictive value for future conversion to dementia of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery applied to a cohort of nondemented patients followed-up for 5 years was presented. Two hundred and fifty subjects were selected from CCC having cognitive complaints, assessment with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and follow-up of at least 5 years (if patients have not converted to dementia earlier). During the follow-up period (2.6±1.8 years for converters and 6.1±2.1 for non converters), 162 patients (64.8%) progressed to dementia (mostly Alzheimer’s disease), and 88 (35.2%) did not. A Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model constituted by Digit Span backward, Semantic Fluency, Logical Memory (immediate recall) and Forgetting Index significantly discriminated converters from non-converters (λ Wilks=0.64; χ2(4)=81.95; p<0.001; RCanonical=0.60). Logical Memory (immediate recall) was the strongest predictor with a standardized canonical discriminant function coefficient of 0.70. The LDA classificatory model showed good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values (78.8%, 79.9% and 78.6%, respectively) of the neuropsychological tests to predict long-term conversion to dementia. Results showed that it is possible to predict, on the basis of the initial clinical and neuropsychological evaluation, namely with routine tests from a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, whether non-demented patients with cognitive complaints will probably convert to dementia, or remain stable. This prediction is obtained with very good accuracy values (≈80%), similar to those reported for the newly research biomarkers, and at a reasonably long and clinically relevant term (5 years).A esperança média de vida tem vindo a aumentar e consequentemente, de modo gradual, também a prevalência de doenças neurodegenerativas, representando actualmente na população mais envelhecida um alarmante problema de saúde pública. A doença de Alzheimer é a forma mais comum de demência e afecta milhões de indivíduos adultos. Recentemente tem sido possível alcançar avanços significativos na compreensão e no conhecimento sobre os biomarcadores que traduzem os processos patofisiológicos associados à doença de Alzheimer, no entanto, é importante salientar que o fenótipo manifestado pode ainda ser de etiologia heterogénea. Compreender melhor a variação das expressões de fenótipo contigentes ao processo neuropatológico é essencial para uma identificação e intervenção mais precoce no processo neurodegenerativo. Recentemente foram propostos novos biomarcadores, ainda limitados ao âmbito da investigação, com o propósito de realizar mais cedo o diagnóstico de doença de Alzheimer. Não obstante o seu potencial, será de referir que a presença de significativas alterações cognitivas continua a ser um elemento de diagnóstico incontornável e um indicador precoce da doença de Alzheimer. Os marcadores neuropsicológicos poderão oferecer indicadores de uma futura progressão para demência que serão economicamente mais acessíveis e clinicamente menos invasivos do que a realização dos métodos necessários aos marcadores biológicos, que além de serem mais dispendiosos, apenas se encontram disponíveis em alguns centros médicos especializados e serão em alguns casos métodos invasivos (e.g., recolha de líquido cefalorraquidiano através de punção lombar). Por conseguinte, não será razoável assumir que se irá disponibilizar a todos os indivíduos com manifestas queixas subjectivas de alterações cognitivas os recentes biomarcadores, por requerem técnicas dispendiosas e/ou invasivas. Por outro lado, é importante referir que a abordagem em presente desenvolvimento para tratar a doença incidindo na modificação dos seus factores causais requer uma selecção inicial do maior número possível de indivíduos para os quais o risco de progressão para demência seja significativo. Assim sendo, o objectivo central da presente tese foi o de melhorar o valor preditivo das medidas neuropsicológicas para a determinação de uma futura progressão para demência de indivíduos com queixa de alterações cognitivas que contudo não preenchem ainda os critérios para o diagnóstico de demência. De modo a concretizar o objectivo central, quatro estudos foram desenvolvidos: 1.º - Uma revisão sistemática da literatura foi realizada com base em estudos originais publicados sobre o valor preditivo da avaliação neuropsicológica de uma futura progressão para demência, apresentando para tal os valores de sensibilidade, especificidade e magnitude do efeito para cada uma das provas neuropsicológicas. A selecção dos artigos permitiu a identificação de 24 artigos publicados nos últimos 20 anos. Os testes neuropsicológicos aplicados mudavam consideravelmente consoante o estudo em questão, contudo verificava-se que no conjunto de estudos era consistente a aplicação de provas de avaliação da memória verbal, mas também de avaliação de funções executivas, capacidade de atenção e linguagem. A presença de limitações metodológicas condicionou a potencialidade de apresentar valores preditivos razoáveis em alguns estudos, além disso, noutros estudos os valores de sensibilidade e especificidade apresentados para as provas neuropsicológicas enquanto preditoras de futura progressão para demência eram consideravelmente díspares. No entanto será importante salientar que também foi possível identificar em parte dos estudos descritos a presença de valores muito positivos e de razões equilibradas entre sensibilidade e especificidade (≥80%), principalmente para provas de avaliação da memória verbal episódica, contudo os tempos de seguimento eram na sua maioria curtos (aproximadamente 2 anos). Com certeza que seria relevante encontrar um consenso que pudesse futuramente guiar uma escolha viável e precisa das provas neuropsicológicas a aplicar para melhor predizer uma futura progressão para demência. Por outro lado, a existência de estudos de coorte longitudinais com períodos de seguimento mais alargados seria essencial para melhorar a precisão dos valores preditivos da avaliação neuropsicológica, tornando-se estes clinicamente mais relevantes no que respeita a uma futura progressão para demência. 2.º Os novos métodos de classificação estatística associados a técnicas de Prospecção de dados (em inglês data mining) e Sistemas de Aprendizagem (em inglês machine learning) foram aplicados com o intuito de melhorar a precisão, sensibilidade e especificidade dos preditores obtidos pela avaliação neuropsicológica. Para a comparação dos métodos classificatórios recorreu-se à base de dados CCC (CCC – Cognitive Complaints Cohort) que era constituída na altura por 775 casos de pacientes idosos não-dementes com queixas de alterações cognitivas e que foram referenciados para realizarem uma avaliação neuropsicológica. A comparação dos métodos estatísticos realizou-se entre 7 classificadores não-paramétricos provenientes de métodos de Prospecção de dados (Redes Neuronais com Perceptrões Multicamada; Redes Neuronais com Funções de Base Radial; Máquinas de Vectores de Suporte; CART; CHAID; Árvores de Classificação QUEST e Árvores de Classificação Aleatória) que foram comparados com três classificadores tradicionais (Análise Discriminante Linear; Análise Discriminante Quadrática, e Regressão Logística) em termos de precisão classificatória, especificidade, sensibilidade, área abaixo da curva ROC e Press’Q. O modelo para a predição consistia em 10 testes neuropsicológicos utilizados recorrentemente para o diagnóstico de demência. A comparação de classificadores identificou três métodos como os mais adequados para testar o valor preditivo dos testes neuropsicológicos em estudos longitudinais de coortes clínicas. As Máquinas de Vectores de Suporte demonstraram valores mais elevados de precisão classificatória (Mediana (Me)= 0,76) e de área abaixo da curva ROC (Me= 0,90). De salientar que, no que respeita à especificidade, este método revelou um valor elevado (Me= 1,0), contudo o valor de sensibilidade era consideravelmente baixo (Me= 0,30). As Florestas Aleatórias foram o segundo método com melhores resultados em termos de precisão (Me= 0,73), área abaixo da curva ROC (Me= 0,73), especificidade (Me= 0,73) e sensibilidade (Me= 0,64). A Análise Discriminante Linear demonstrou igualmente valores razoáveis de precisão (Me= 0,66), área abaixo da curva ROC (Me= 0,72), especificidade (Me= 0,66) e sensibilidade (Me= 0,64). Os resultados apresentados indicam que os melhores métodos classificatórios para analisar os preditores neuropsicológicos de futura progressão para demência correspondem às Florestas Aleatórias no âmbito dos mais inovadores métodos de Prospecção de dados e à Análise Discriminante Linear, enquanto método de eleição de entre os mais tradicionais para classificação de dados. 3.º A memória verbal é considerada uma das primeiras áreas cognitivas a manifestar declínio nos casos de Doença de Alzheimer. Por conseguinte, o valor preditivo de progressão para demência (Doença de Alzheimer) associado ao Defeito Cognitivo Ligeiro (DCL) foi analisado contemplando para o diagnóstico de DCL quatro testes diferentes de avaliação da memória verbal (Memória Lógica (LM); Teste de Aprendizagem Verbal de Califórnia (CVLT); Aprendizagem Verbal Associativa com Pares de Palavras (VPAL); e, Memória de Dígitos (DS)). Para o estudo foi seleccionada uma amostra consecutiva de pacientes com queixas de alterações cognitivas que em consequência das mesmas foram referenciados para realizar uma avaliação neuropsicológica pormenorizada numa clínica de memória, mas que não preenchiam ainda os critérios para o diagnóstico de demência. Uma amostra inicial de 272 pacientes com queixas cognitivas e não-dementes foram seleccionados da coorte CCC para o presente estudo. No decurso do período de seguimento (3,0±1,9 anos) ocorreu a conversão para demência em 58 pacientes, enquanto 214 permaneceram cognitivamente estáveis. Nas provas de LM, VPAL e CVLT verificaram-se diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre o grupo que converteu e o que não converteu. Através de uma análise de Regressão Multivariada de COX com um modelo constituído pelas quatro provas de memória verbal demonstrou-se que apenas a prova CVLT mantém a significância enquanto preditor de futura conversão para demência. Assim sendo, pacientes que não se encontram dementes mas que manifestam queixas de alterações cognitivas, com o diagnóstico de DCL recorrendo à pontuação na prova CVLT, se apresentarem defeito nesta prova (< 1,5 desvios-padrão abaixo da média de referência) têm um risco acrescido de evoluir para demência dentro do período de seguimento. Consequentemente, uma avaliação neuropsicológica incluindo a prova CVLT deve ser contemplada para os critérios de diagnóstico de DCL de modo a predizer com maior precisão uma futura conversão para demência. 4.º Uma coorte constituída por 250 indivíduos (seleccionados da base de dados CCC) com queixas cognitivas mas sem critérios de demência e com seguimento clínico superior a 5 anos (com excepção para os casos que evoluíram para demência antes dos 5 anos) foi analisada com vista à determinação do valor preditivo dos testes neuropsicológicos a longo prazo. Durante o período de seguimento (2,6±1,8 anos para os indivíduos que evoluíram para demência e 6,1±2,1 anos para os que permaneceram estáveis a nível cognitivo) 162 indivíduos (64,8%) apresentaram os critérios para o diagnóstico de demência (principalmente para Doença de Alzheimer), enquanto que 88 (35,2%) permaneceram estáveis. Foi possível discriminar entre os indivíduos que progrediram para demência e os que permaneceram estáveis através de um modelo de Análise Discriminante Linear (ADL) com os resultados iniciais da avaliação nas provas: Memória de Dígitos inversa, Fluência Semântica, Memória Lógica (evocação imediata), e o Índice de Esquecimento da Memória Lógica (λ Wilks= 0,64; χ2 (4)= 81,95; p< 0,001; RCanonical= 0,60). O preditor neuropsicológico mais robusto, com coeficiente estandardizado da função discriminante (canónica) de 0,70, foi a prova de Memória Lógica (evocação imediata). O modelo classificatório da ADL demonstrou valores muito positivos para a sensibilidade, especificidade e precisão classificatória (78,8%, 79,9% e 78,6%, respectivamente), dos testes neuropsicológicos para predizer uma futura progressão para demência a longo prazo. Os resultados apresentados evidenciam a possibilidade de predizer, com base numa avaliação inicial, clínica e neuropsicológica, com uma bateria de provas cognitivas aplicada na rotina clínica, se o indivíduo que apresenta queixas cognitivas irá evoluir para demência ou permanecer estável nos próximos anos. Será de salientar que o valor preditivo foi obtido com uma precisão bastante aceitável (≈ 80%), na ordem dos valores obtidos para os biomarcadores mais recentes, e no âmbito de um período de seguimento consideravelmente longo e portanto clinicamente relevante (5 anos)

Understanding Cognitive Variability in Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is highly heterogenous, both clinically and biologically. This variability is exacerbated by the ways within which, the clinical presentation is assessed with cognitive measures. This inhibits clinical trial success and earlier diagnosis of individuals. Marrying the clinical presentation to the pathology of the disease has so far proved troublesome. This thesis will look at how cognitive measures can best capture the clinical presentation of AD and how these measures can link to the underlying pathology using machine learning methods. This thesis studied this problem across four analyses and two cohorts. Each study looked at a different aspect of cognitive testing within AD. This was done with the overarching aim to interrogate the cognitive variability across the spectrum of AD. Study 1 showed a novel discrepancy score is different to memory measures at screening for AD. It also showed it tracks with AD severity, in the same way memory recall does. Studies 2 & 3 uncovered broad psychometric variance within amnestic measurement of impairment due to AD. This was done in two different populations across two different constructs of amnestic measurement, story recall and verbal list learning. These tests are frequently used interchangeably. These two studies show they should not be. Finally, Study 4 built models from cognitive measures to predict AD pathology. The performance of these models was moderate showing that even with novel cognitive measures, further work is needed to link the clinical and amyloid related biological presentations of AD. Bridging the gap between clinical presentation and pathology of AD using clinical and cognitive markers alone is not possible. Even when using a novel measure of discrepancy score. The discrepancy measure shows promise but was limited due to the inability of the MMSE to measure verbal ability. Conceptually a discrepancy score remains a promising avenue of research for screening, but broader language measures, as well as other AD biomarkers are needed to further test the construct validity of this measure