2,444 research outputs found
Refinement Modal Logic
In this paper we present {\em refinement modal logic}. A refinement is like a
bisimulation, except that from the three relational requirements only `atoms'
and `back' need to be satisfied. Our logic contains a new operator 'all' in
addition to the standard modalities 'box' for each agent. The operator 'all'
acts as a quantifier over the set of all refinements of a given model. As a
variation on a bisimulation quantifier, this refinement operator or refinement
quantifier 'all' can be seen as quantifying over a variable not occurring in
the formula bound by it. The logic combines the simplicity of multi-agent modal
logic with some powers of monadic second-order quantification. We present a
sound and complete axiomatization of multi-agent refinement modal logic. We
also present an extension of the logic to the modal mu-calculus, and an
axiomatization for the single-agent version of this logic. Examples and
applications are also discussed: to software verification and design (the set
of agents can also be seen as a set of actions), and to dynamic epistemic
logic. We further give detailed results on the complexity of satisfiability,
and on succinctness
Completeness of Flat Coalgebraic Fixpoint Logics
Modal fixpoint logics traditionally play a central role in computer science,
in particular in artificial intelligence and concurrency. The mu-calculus and
its relatives are among the most expressive logics of this type. However,
popular fixpoint logics tend to trade expressivity for simplicity and
readability, and in fact often live within the single variable fragment of the
mu-calculus. The family of such flat fixpoint logics includes, e.g., LTL, CTL,
and the logic of common knowledge. Extending this notion to the generic
semantic framework of coalgebraic logic enables covering a wide range of logics
beyond the standard mu-calculus including, e.g., flat fragments of the graded
mu-calculus and the alternating-time mu-calculus (such as alternating-time
temporal logic ATL), as well as probabilistic and monotone fixpoint logics. We
give a generic proof of completeness of the Kozen-Park axiomatization for such
flat coalgebraic fixpoint logics.Comment: Short version appeared in Proc. 21st International Conference on
Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2010, Vol. 6269 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, Springer, 2010, pp. 524-53
Logic-Based Specification Languages for Intelligent Software Agents
The research field of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) aims to find
abstractions, languages, methodologies and toolkits for modeling, verifying,
validating and prototyping complex applications conceptualized as Multiagent
Systems (MASs). A very lively research sub-field studies how formal methods can
be used for AOSE. This paper presents a detailed survey of six logic-based
executable agent specification languages that have been chosen for their
potential to be integrated in our ARPEGGIO project, an open framework for
specifying and prototyping a MAS. The six languages are ConGoLog, Agent-0, the
IMPACT agent programming language, DyLog, Concurrent METATEM and Ehhf. For each
executable language, the logic foundations are described and an example of use
is shown. A comparison of the six languages and a survey of similar approaches
complete the paper, together with considerations of the advantages of using
logic-based languages in MAS modeling and prototyping.Comment: 67 pages, 1 table, 1 figure. Accepted for publication by the Journal
"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming", volume 4, Maurice Bruynooghe
Editor-in-Chie
Model Checking an Epistemic mu-calculus with Synchronous and Perfect Recall Semantics
We identify a subproblem of the model-checking problem for the epistemic
\mu-calculus which is decidable. Formulas in the instances of this subproblem
allow free variables within the scope of epistemic modalities in a restricted
form that avoids embodying any form of common knowledge. Our subproblem
subsumes known decidable fragments of epistemic CTL/LTL, may express winning
strategies in two-player games with one player having imperfect information and
non-observable objectives, and, with a suitable encoding, decidable instances
of the model-checking problem for ATLiR.Comment: 10 pages, Poster presentation at TARK 2013 (arXiv:1310.6382)
http://www.tark.or
Disjunctive bases: normal forms and model theory for modal logics
We present the concept of a disjunctive basis as a generic framework for
normal forms in modal logic based on coalgebra. Disjunctive bases were defined
in previous work on completeness for modal fixpoint logics, where they played a
central role in the proof of a generic completeness theorem for coalgebraic
mu-calculi. Believing the concept has a much wider significance, here we
investigate it more thoroughly in its own right. We show that the presence of a
disjunctive basis at the "one-step" level entails a number of good properties
for a coalgebraic mu-calculus, in particular, a simulation theorem showing that
every alternating automaton can be transformed into an equivalent
nondeterministic one. Based on this, we prove a Lyndon theorem for the full
fixpoint logic, its fixpoint-free fragment and its one-step fragment, a Uniform
Interpolation result, for both the full mu-calculus and its fixpoint-free
fragment, and a Janin-Walukiewicz-style characterization theorem for the
mu-calculus under slightly stronger assumptions.
We also raise the questions, when a disjunctive basis exists, and how
disjunctive bases are related to Moss' coalgebraic "nabla" modalities. Nabla
formulas provide disjunctive bases for many coalgebraic modal logics, but there
are cases where disjunctive bases give useful normal forms even when nabla
formulas fail to do so, our prime example being graded modal logic. We also
show that disjunctive bases are preserved by forming sums, products and
compositions of coalgebraic modal logics, providing tools for modular
construction of modal logics admitting disjunctive bases. Finally, we consider
the problem of giving a category-theoretic formulation of disjunctive bases,
and provide a partial solution
Progression and Verification of Situation Calculus Agents with Bounded Beliefs
We investigate agents that have incomplete information and make decisions based on their beliefs expressed as situation calculus bounded action theories. Such theories have an infinite object domain, but the number of objects that belong to fluents at each time point is bounded by a given constant. Recently, it has been shown that verifying temporal properties over such theories is decidable. We take a first-person view and use the theory to capture what the agent believes about the domain of interest and the actions affecting it. In this paper, we study verification of temporal properties over online executions. These are executions resulting from agents performing only actions that are feasible according to their beliefs. To do so, we first examine progression, which captures belief state update resulting from actions in the situation calculus. We show that, for bounded action theories, progression, and hence belief states, can always be represented as a bounded first-order logic theory. Then, based on this result, we prove decidability of temporal verification over online executions for bounded action theories. © 2015 The Author(s
- …