A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Moravejosharieh, Amirhossein, Lloret, Jaime. (2016). A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks.International Journal of Communication Systems, 29, 7, 1269-1292. DOI: 10.1002/dac.3098, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3098. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving[EN] Wireless body sensor networks are offered to meet the requirements of a diverse set of applications such as health-related and well-being applications. For instance, they are deployed to measure, fetch and collect human body vital signs. Such information could be further used for diagnosis and monitoring of medical conditions. IEEE 802.15.4 is arguably considered as a well-designed standard protocol to address the need for low-rate, low-power and low-cost wireless body sensor networks. Apart from the vast deployment of this technology, there are still some challenges and issues related to the performance of the medium access control (MAC) protocol of this standard that are required to be addressed. This paper comprises two main parts. In the first part, the survey has provided a thorough assessment of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol performance where its functionality is evaluated considering a range of effective system parameters, that is, some of the MAC and application parameters and the impact of mutual interference. The second part of this paper is about conducting a simulation study to determine the influence of varying values of the system parameters on IEEE 802.15.4 performance gains. More specifically, we explore the dependability level of IEEE 802.5.4 performance gains on a candidate set of system parameters. Finally, this paper highlights the tangible needs to conduct more investigations on particular aspect(s) of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Moravejosharieh, A.; Lloret, J. (2016). A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. 29(7):1269-1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3098S12691292297Alrajeh, N. A., Lloret, J., & Canovas, A. (2014). A Framework for Obesity Control Using a Wireless Body Sensor Network. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(7), 534760. doi:10.1155/2014/534760Lopes I Silva B Rodrigues J Lloret J Proenca M A mobile health monitoring solution for weight control International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) Nanjing / China 2011 1 5Singh, N., Singh, A. K., & Singh, V. K. (2015). Design and performance of wearable ultrawide band textile antenna for medical applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 57(7), 1553-1557. doi:10.1002/mop.29131Lan, K., Chou, C.-M., Wang, T., & Li, M.-W. (2012). Using body sensor networks for motion detection: a cluster-based approach for green radio. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 25(2), 199-216. doi:10.1002/ett.2559Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Catala, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2016). A group-based wireless body sensors network using energy harvesting for soccer team monitoring. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 21(4), 208. doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2016.079172Garcia M Catala A Lloret J Rodrigues J A wireless sensor network for soccer team monitoring International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops (DCOSS) Barcelona / Spain 2011 1 6Penders J Gyselinckx B Vullers R De Nil M Nimmala V van de Molengraft J Yazicioglu F Torfs T Leonov V Merken P Van Hoof C Human++: from technology to emerging health monitoring concepts 5th International Summer School and Symposium ISSS-MDBS on Medical Devices and Biosensors Hong Kong 2008 94 98Penders J Van de Molengraft J. Brown L Grundlehner B Gyselinckx B Van Hoof C Potential and challenges of body area networks for personal health Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC Minneapolis, U.S. 2009 6569 6572Ullah, S., Higgins, H., Braem, B., Latre, B., Blondia, C., Moerman, I., … Kwak, K. S. (2010). A Comprehensive Survey of Wireless Body Area Networks. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1065-1094. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9571-3Cao, H., Leung, V., Chow, C., & Chan, H. (2009). Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: A survey and outlook. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(12), 84-93. doi:10.1109/mcom.2009.5350373Hall, P. S., Yang Hao, Nechayev, Y. I., Alomainy, A., Constantinou, C. C., Parini, C., … Bozzetti, M. (2007). Antennas and propagation for on-body communication systems. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 49(3), 41-58. doi:10.1109/map.2007.4293935Mamaghanian, H., Khaled, N., Atienza, D., & Vandergheynst, P. (2011). Compressed Sensing for Real-Time Energy-Efficient ECG Compression on Wireless Body Sensor Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(9), 2456-2466. doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2156795LAN-MAN Standards Committee the IEEE Computer Society IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.4: low rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs) 2011Petrova M Riihijarvi J Mahonen P Labella S Performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 using measurements and simulations IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2006 487 492Vaithiyanathan, J., Raju, R. K., & Sadayan, G. (2011). Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 Using Association Process and Channel Measurement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 409-417. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22555-0_42Yazdi E Moravejosharieh A Willig A Pawlikowski K Coupling power and frequency adaptation for interference mitigation in IEEE 802.15.4-based mobile body sensor networks: part II 2014 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) Melbourne, Australia 2014 105 110Pelegris P Banitsas K Investigating the efficiency of IEEE 802.15.4 for medical monitoring applications 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC Boston, U.S. 2011 8215 8218Ranjit, J. S., & Shin, S. (2013). A Modified IEEE 802.15.4 Superframe Structure for Guaranteed Emergency Handling in Wireless Body Area Network. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 5(2), 1. doi:10.5296/npa.v5i2.3375Jianliang Zheng, & Lee, M. J. (2004). Will IEEE 802.15.4 make ubiquitous networking a reality?: a discussion on a potential low power, low bit rate standard. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(6), 140-146. doi:10.1109/mcom.2004.1304251Toscano E Lo Bello L Cross-channel interference in IEEE 802.15.4 networks IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, 2008. WFCS 2008 Dresden, Germany 2008 139 148Bashir F Baek WS Sthapit P Pandey D young Pyun J Coordinator assisted passive discovery for mobile end devices in IEEE 802.15.4 2013 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2013 601 604Tabatabaei Yazdi E Willig A Pawlikowski K Shortening orphan time in IEEE 802.15.4: what can be gained 2013 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON) Singapore 2013 1 6Park, T. R., Kim, T. H., Choi, J. Y., Choi, S., & Kwon, W. H. (2005). Throughput and energy consumption analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 slotted CSMA∕CA. Electronics Letters, 41(18), 1017. doi:10.1049/el:20051662Bianchi, G. (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), 535-547. doi:10.1109/49.840210IEEE Computer Society LAN MAN Standards Committee Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications 1997Pollin, S., Ergen, M., Ergen, S. C., Bougard, B., Der Perre, L. V., Moerman, I., … Catthoor, F. (2008). Performance Analysis of Slotted Carrier Sense IEEE 802.15.4 Medium Access Layer. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(9), 3359-3371. doi:10.1109/twc.2008.060057Xinhua Ling, Yu Cheng, Mark, J. W., & Xuemin Shen. (2008). A Renewal Theory Based Analytical Model for the Contention Access Period of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(6), 2340-2349. doi:10.1109/twc.2008.070048Lee, C. Y., Cho, H. I., Hwang, G. U., Doh, Y., & Park, N. (2011). Performance modeling and analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 slotted CSMA/CA protocol with ACK mode. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 65(2), 123-131. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2010.02.007Wang, F., Zhao, Y., & Li, D. (2011). Analysis of CSMA/CA in IEEE 802.15.4. IET Communications, 5(15), 2187-2195. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.1007Zhu, J., Tao, Z., & Lv, C. (2011). Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA/CA Scheme Adopting a Modified LIB Model. Wireless Personal Communications, 65(1), 25-51. doi:10.1007/s11277-011-0226-6Shu F Sakurai T Analysis of an energy conserving CSMA-CA GLOBECOM Washington DC, U.S. 2007 2536 2540Shu, F., & Sakurai, T. (2011). A new analytical model for the IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA-CA protocol. Computer Networks, 55(11), 2576-2591. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.04.017Cano-Garcia, J. M., & Casilari, E. (2011). An empirical evaluation of the consumption of 802.15.4/ZigBee sensor motes in noisy environments. 2011 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. doi:10.1109/icnsc.2011.5874886Baz, M., Mitchell, P. D., & Pearce, D. A. J. (2013). Versatile Analytical Model for Delay and Energy Evaluation in WPANs: A Case Study for IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA-CA. Wireless Personal Communications, 75(1), 415-445. doi:10.1007/s11277-013-1370-yLiu Q Czylwik A A priority-based adaptive service differentiation scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 sensor networks Proceedings of European Wireless 2014; 20th European Wireless Conference Barcelona, Spain 2014 1 6Golmie, N., Cypher, D., & Rebala, O. (s. f.). Performance evaluation of low rate WPANs for medical applications. IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004. doi:10.1109/milcom.2004.1494952Misic, J., Misic, V. B., & Shafi, S. (s. f.). Performance of IEEE 802.15.4 beacon enabled PAN with uplink transmissions in non-saturation mode - access delay for finite buffers. First International Conference on Broadband Networks. doi:10.1109/broadnets.2004.61Mišić, J., Shafi, S., & Mišić, V. B. (2005). The impact of MAC parameters on the performance of 802.15.4 PAN. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(5), 509-528. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.08.002Anastasi, G., Conti, M., & Di Francesco, M. (2011). A Comprehensive Analysis of the MAC Unreliability Problem in IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(1), 52-65. doi:10.1109/tii.2010.2085440Lee, B.-H., Al Rasyid, M. U. H., & Wu, H.-K. (2012). Analysis of superframe adjustment and beacon transmission for IEEE 802.15.4 cluster tree networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012(1). doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2012-219Zimmerling, M., Ferrari, F., Mottola, L., Voigt, T., & Thiele, L. (2012). pTunes. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks - IPSN ’12. doi:10.1145/2185677.2185730Rohm, D., Goyal, M., Hosseini, H., Divjak, A., & Bashir, Y. (2009). Configuring Beaconless IEEE 802.15.4 Networks Under Different Traffic Loads. 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications. doi:10.1109/aina.2009.84Jin-Shyan Lee. (2006). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for low-rate wireless personal area networks. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 52(3), 742-749. doi:10.1109/tce.2006.1706465De Paz Alberola, R., & Pesch, D. (2012). Duty cycle learning algorithm (DCLA) for IEEE 802.15.4 beacon-enabled wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(4), 664-679. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.06.006Barbieri, A., Chiti, F., & Fantacci, R. (2006). WSN17-2: Proposal of an Adaptive MAC Protocol for Efficient IEEE 802.15.4 Low Power Communications. IEEE Globecom 2006. doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.989Jeon, J., Lee, J. W., Ha, J. Y., & Kwon, W. H. (2007). DCA: Duty-Cycle Adaptation Algorithm for IEEE 802.15.4 Beacon-Enabled Networks. 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring. doi:10.1109/vetecs.2007.35Kang, M., Chong, J., Hyun, H., Kim, S., Jung, B., & Sung, D. (2007). Adaptive Interference-Aware Multi-Channel Clustering Algorithm in a ZigBee Network in the Presence of WLAN Interference. 2007 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing. doi:10.1109/iswpc.2007.342601Yi, P., Iwayemi, A., & Zhou, C. (2011). Developing ZigBee Deployment Guideline Under WiFi Interference for Smart Grid Applications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(1), 110-120. doi:10.1109/tsg.2010.2091655Tang, L., Wang, K.-C., Huang, Y., & Gu, F. (2007). Channel Characterization and Link Quality Assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-Compliant Radio for Factory Environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 3(2), 99-110. doi:10.1109/tii.2007.898414Sha M Xing G Zhou G Liu S Wang X C-MAC: model-driven concurrent medium access control for wireless sensor networks IEEE INFOCOM 2009 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2009 1845 1853 10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5062105Peizhong Yi, Iwayemi, A., & Chi Zhou. (2010). Frequency agility in a ZigBee network for smart grid application. 2010 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT). doi:10.1109/isgt.2010.5434747Torabi N Wong W Leung VCM A robust coexistence scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 wireless personal area networks IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2011 1031 1035 10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766322IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.6: wireless body area networks IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012 2012 1 271 10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6161600Kim, S., Kim, S., Kim, J.-W., & Eom, D.-S. (2012). Flexible beacon scheduling scheme for interference mitigation in body sensor networks. 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). doi:10.1109/secon.2012.6275772Bradai N Fourati LC Kamoun L Performance analysis of medium access control protocol for wireless body area networks 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) Barcelona, Spain 2013 916 921Moravejosharieh A Yazdi ET Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part I: the need for enhancement IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) Sydney, Australia 2013 1226 1231Moravejosharieh A Yazdi ET Willig A Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part II: greedy channel utilization 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON) Singapore 2013 1 6Moravejosharieh A Yazdi E Willig A Pawlikowski K Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: continuous hopping approach Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) Melbourne, Australia 2014 93 98 10.1109/ATNAC.2014.7020880Moravejosharieh, A. H. (2015). Frequency-Adaptive Approach In IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Body Sensor Networks: Continuous-Assessment or Periodic-Assessment? International Journal of Information, Communication Technology and Applications, 1(1), 19. doi:10.17972/ajicta2015113Moravejosharieh A Yazdi E Pawlikowski K Sirisena H Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: adaptive phase-shifting approach International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC) Sydney, Australia 2015 93 98Bian, K., Park, J.-M., & Gao, B. (2014). Channel Assignment for Multi-hop Cognitive Radio Networks. Cognitive Radio Networks, 101-116. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07329-3_6Bian, K., Park, J.-M., & Gao, B. (2014). Coexistence-Aware Spectrum Sharing for Homogeneous Cognitive Radio Networks. Cognitive Radio Networks, 61-75. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07329-3_4Wu C Yan H Huo H A multi-channel MAC protocol design based on IEEE 802.15.4 standard in industry 2012 10th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) Beijing, China 2012 1206 1211 10.1109/INDIN.2012.6300916Incel, O. D. (2011). A survey on multi-channel communication in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 55(13), 3081-3099. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.05.020Kim Y Shin H Cha H Y-MAC: an energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN '08 St. Louis MO, U.S. 2008 53 63Demirkol, I., Ersoy, C., & Alagoz, F. (2006). MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44(4), 115-121. doi:10.1109/mcom.2006.1632658Wykret T Correia L Macedo D Giacomin J Andrade L Evaluation and avoidance of interference in WSN: a multi-radio node prototype using dynamic spectrum allocation IFIP Wireless Days (WD) Valencia, Spain 2013 1 3 10.1109/WD.2013.6686533Doyle L Sutton P Nolan K Lotze J Ozgul B Rondeau T Fahmy S Lahlou H DaSilva L Experiences from the IRIS testbed in dynamic spectrum access and cognitive radio experimentation IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Singapore 2010 1 8 10.1109/DYSPAN.2010.5457835Ansari, J., Zhang, X., & Mahonen, P. (2010). Multi-radio medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 8(1), 47. doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2010.034066Liu Z Wu W A dynamic multi-radio multi-channel MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks 2nd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) Singapore 2010 105 109Xu, W., Trappe, W., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Defending wireless sensor networks from radio interference through channel adaptation. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 4(4), 1-34. doi:10.1145/1387663.1387664Kim Y Shin H Cha H Y-MAC: an energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN '08 Washington, DC, USA 2008 53 63Tae Hyun Kim, Jae Yeol Ha, & Sunghyun Choi. (2009). Improving Spectral and Temporal Efficiency of Collocated IEEE 802.15.4 LR-WPANs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(12), 1596-1609. doi:10.1109/tmc.2009.85Chowdhury, K. R., Nandiraju, N., Chanda, P., Agrawal, D. P., & Zeng, Q.-A. (2009). Channel allocation and medium access control for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(2), 307-321. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2008.03.004Deylami, M., & Jovanov, E. (2012). A distributed and collaborative scheme for mitigating coexistence in IEEE 802.15.4 based WBANs. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on - ACM-SE ’12. doi:10.1145/2184512.2184514Deylami, M. N., & Jovanov, E. (2014). A Distributed Scheme to Manage The Dynamic Coexistence of IEEE 802.15.4-Based Health-Monitoring WBANs. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 18(1), 327-334. doi:10.1109/jbhi.2013.2278217Deylami M Jovanov E An implementation of a distributed scheme for managing the dynamic coexistence of wireless body area networks Southeastcon, 2013 Proceedings of IEEE Jacksonville, U.S. 2013 1 6 10.1109/SECON.2013.6567446Cavallari, R., Martelli, F., Rosini, R., Buratti, C., & Verdone, R. (2014). A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks: Technologies and Design Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1635-1657. doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00007Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., & Leung, V. C. M. (2010). Body Area Networks: A Survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 16(2), 171-193. doi:10.1007/s11036-010-0260-8Movassaghi, S., Abolhasan, M., Lipman, J., Smith, D., & Jamalipour, A. (2014). Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1658-1686. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.121313.00064Patel, M., & Wang, J. (2010). Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(1), 80-88. doi:10.1109/mwc.2010.5416354ULLAH, S., KHAN, P., ULLAH, N., SALEEM, S., HIGGINS, H., & Sup KWAK, K. (2009). A Review of Wireless Body Area Networks for Medical Applications. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 02(08), 797-803. doi:10.4236/ijcns.2009.28093Boulis, A., Smith, D., Miniutti, D., Libman, L., & Tselishchev, Y. (2012). Challenges in body area networks for healthcare: the MAC. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(5), 100-106. doi:10.1109/mcom.2012.6194389Pantelopoulos A Bourbakis N A survey on wearable biosensor systems for health monitoring 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Vancouver, Canada 2008 4887 4890 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650309Takei, K., Honda, W., Harada, S., Arie, T., & Akita, S. (2014). Toward Flexible and Wearable Human-Interactive Health-Monitoring Devices. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4(4), 487-500. doi:10.1002/adhm.201400546Caldeira, J. M. L. P., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Lorenz, P. (2013). Intra-Mobility Support Solutions for Healthcare Wireless Sensor Networks–Handover Issues. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(11), 4339-4348. doi:10.1109/jsen.2013.2267729Carrano, R. C., Passos, D., Magalhaes, L. C. S., & Albuquerque, C. V. N. (2014). Survey and Taxonomy of Duty Cycling Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 181-194. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00116Sudevalayam, S., & Kulkarni, P. (2011). Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(3), 443-461. doi:10.1109/surv.2011.060710.00094Khanafer, M., Guennoun, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2014). A Survey of Beacon-Enabled IEEE 802.15.4 MAC Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(2), 856-876. doi:10.1

Wireless industrial monitoring and control networks: the journey so far and the road ahead

While traditional wired communication technologies have played a crucial role in industrial monitoring and control networks over the past few decades, they are increasingly proving to be inadequate to meet the highly dynamic and stringent demands of today’s industrial applications, primarily due to the very rigid nature of wired infrastructures. Wireless technology, however, through its increased pervasiveness, has the potential to revolutionize the industry, not only by mitigating the problems faced by wired solutions, but also by introducing a completely new class of applications. While present day wireless technologies made some preliminary inroads in the monitoring domain, they still have severe limitations especially when real-time, reliable distributed control operations are concerned. This article provides the reader with an overview of existing wireless technologies commonly used in the monitoring and control industry. It highlights the pros and cons of each technology and assesses the degree to which each technology is able to meet the stringent demands of industrial monitoring and control networks. Additionally, it summarizes mechanisms proposed by academia, especially serving critical applications by addressing the real-time and reliability requirements of industrial process automation. The article also describes certain key research problems from the physical layer communication for sensor networks and the wireless networking perspective that have yet to be addressed to allow the successful use of wireless technologies in industrial monitoring and control networks

Survey on wireless technology trade-offs for the industrial internet of things

Aside from vast deployment cost reduction, Industrial Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (IWSAN) introduce a new level of industrial connectivity. Wireless connection of sensors and actuators in industrial environments not only enables wireless monitoring and actuation, it also enables coordination of production stages, connecting mobile robots and autonomous transport vehicles, as well as localization and tracking of assets. All these opportunities already inspired the development of many wireless technologies in an effort to fully enable Industry 4.0. However, different technologies significantly differ in performance and capabilities, none being capable of supporting all industrial use cases. When designing a network solution, one must be aware of the capabilities and the trade-offs that prospective technologies have. This paper evaluates the technologies potentially suitable for IWSAN solutions covering an entire industrial site with limited infrastructure cost and discusses their trade-offs in an effort to provide information for choosing the most suitable technology for the use case of interest. The comparative discussion presented in this paper aims to enable engineers to choose the most suitable wireless technology for their specific IWSAN deployment

Comparative study of IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.15.6 for WBAN-based CANet

International audienceIn this paper, we present an overview of IEEE 802.15.4 and 802.15.6 standards. Thereafter, in view of their various strengths and many similarities, we study the possibility of using one of these two norms to implement the body area network (WBAN) of CANet (an innovative ehealth project) scenario according to the nature of the studied sensors. To do so, we considered an hybrid differentiation layer, previously proposed, based on 802.15.4 and we made a classification of CANet ehealth sensors based on IEEE 802.15.6 native superframe periods and priority and service differentiation systems. Each choice between them has its advantages and disadvantages. Thus, it will be necessary to analyse in detail the simulation and prototyping results of 802.15.4 and 802.15.6 norms once implemented in CANet context in order to decide about the standard providing the optimal QoS

Connecting the World of Embedded Mobiles: The RIOT Approach to Ubiquitous Networking for the Internet of Things

The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly evolving based on low-power compliant protocol standards that extend the Internet into the embedded world. Pioneering implementations have proven it is feasible to inter-network very constrained devices, but had to rely on peculiar cross-layered designs and offer a minimalistic set of features. In the long run, however, professional use and massive deployment of IoT devices require full-featured, cleanly composed, and flexible network stacks. This paper introduces the networking architecture that turns RIOT into a powerful IoT system, to enable low-power wireless scenarios. RIOT networking offers (i) a modular architecture with generic interfaces for plugging in drivers, protocols, or entire stacks, (ii) support for multiple heterogeneous interfaces and stacks that can concurrently operate, and (iii) GNRC, its cleanly layered, recursively composed default network stack. We contribute an in-depth analysis of the communication performance and resource efficiency of RIOT, both on a micro-benchmarking level as well as by comparing IoT communication across different platforms. Our findings show that, though it is based on significantly different design trade-offs, the networking subsystem of RIOT achieves a performance equivalent to that of Contiki and TinyOS, the two operating systems which pioneered IoT software platforms

ATLAS: A Traffic Load Aware Sensor MAC Design for Collaborative Body Area Sensor Networks

In collaborative body sensor networks, namely wireless body area networks (WBANs), each of the physical sensor applications is used to collaboratively monitor the health status of the human body. The applications of WBANs comprise diverse and dynamic traffic loads such as very low-rate periodic monitoring (i.e., observation) data and high-rate traffic including event-triggered bursts. Therefore, in designing a medium access control (MAC) protocol for WBANs, energy conservation should be the primary concern during low-traffic periods, whereas a balance between satisfying high-throughput demand and efficient energy usage is necessary during high-traffic times. In this paper, we design a traffic load-aware innovative MAC solution for WBANs, called ATLAS. The design exploits the superframe structure of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard, and it adaptively uses the contention access period (CAP), contention free period (CFP) and inactive period (IP) of the superframe based on estimated traffic load, by applying a dynamic “wh” (whenever which is required) approach. Unlike earlier work, the proposed MAC design includes load estimation for network load-status awareness and a multi-hop communication pattern in order to prevent energy loss associated with long range transmission. Finally, ATLAS is evaluated through extensive simulations in ns-2 and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the protocol

Performance Analyses and Improvements for the IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA/CA Scheme with Heterogeneous Buffered Conditions

Studies of the IEEE 802.15.4 Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) scheme have been received considerable attention recently, with most of these studies focusing on homogeneous or saturated traffic. Two novel transmission schemes—OSTS/BSTS (One Service a Time Scheme/Bulk Service a Time Scheme)—are proposed in this paper to improve the behaviors of time-critical buffered networks with heterogeneous unsaturated traffic. First, we propose a model which contains two modified semi-Markov chains and a macro-Markov chain combined with the theory of M/G/1/K queues to evaluate the characteristics of these two improved CSMA/CA schemes, in which traffic arrivals and accessing packets are bestowed with non-preemptive priority over each other, instead of prioritization. Then, throughput, packet delay and energy consumption of unsaturated, unacknowledged IEEE 802.15.4 beacon-enabled networks are predicted based on the overall point of view which takes the dependent interactions of different types of nodes into account. Moreover, performance comparisons of these two schemes with other non-priority schemes are also proposed. Analysis and simulation results show that delay and fairness of our schemes are superior to those of other schemes, while throughput and energy efficiency are superior to others in more heterogeneous situations. Comprehensive simulations demonstrate that the analysis results of these models match well with the simulation results

Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless sensor networks are penetrating our daily lives, and they are starting to be deployed even in an industrial environment. The research on such industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) considers more stringent requirements of robustness, reliability, and timeliness in each network layer. This Special Issue presents the recent research result on industrial wireless sensor networks. Each paper in this Special Issue has unique contributions in the advancements of industrial wireless sensor network research and we expect each paper to promote the relevant research and the deployment of IWSNs