26,157 research outputs found

    Interval-based Temporal Reasoning with General TBoxes

    Get PDF
    From the Motivation: „Description Logics (DLs) are a family of formalisms well-suited for the representation of and reasoning about knowledge. Whereas most Description Logics represent only static aspects of the application domain, recent research resulted in the exploration of various Description Logics that allow to, additionally, represent temporal information, see [4] for an overview. The approaches to integrate time differ in at least two important aspects: First, the basic temporal entity may be a time point or a time interval. Second, the temporal structure may be part of the semantics (yielding a multi-dimensional semantics) or it may be integrated as a so-called concrete domain. Examples for multi-dimensional point-based logics can be find in, e.g., [21;29], while multi-dimensional interval-based logics are used in, e.g., [23;2]. The concrete domain approach needs some more explanation. Concrete domains have been proposed by Baader and Hanschke as an extension of Description Logics that allows reasoning about 'concrete qualities' of the entities of the application domain such as sizes, length, or weights of real-worlds objects [5]. Description Logics with concrete domains do usually not use a fixed concrete domain; instead the concrete domain can be thought of as a parameter to the logic. As was first described in [16], if a 'temporal' concrete domain is employed, then concrete domains may be point-based, interval-based, or both. ...

    A Parameterized Complexity View on Description Logic Reasoning

    Get PDF
    Description logics are knowledge representation languages that have been designed to strike a balance between expressivity and computational tractability. Many different description logics have been developed, and numerous computational problems for these logics have been studied for their computational complexity. However, essentially all complexity analyses of reasoning problems for description logics use the one-dimensional framework of classical complexity theory. The multi-dimensional framework of parameterized complexity theory is able to provide a much more detailed image of the complexity of reasoning problems. In this paper we argue that the framework of parameterized complexity has a lot to offer for the complexity analysis of description logic reasoning problems---when one takes a progressive and forward-looking view on parameterized complexity tools. We substantiate our argument by means of three case studies. The first case study is about the problem of concept satisfiability for the logic ALC with respect to nearly acyclic TBoxes. The second case study concerns concept satisfiability for ALC concepts parameterized by the number of occurrences of union operators and the number of occurrences of full existential quantification. The third case study offers a critical look at data complexity results from a parameterized complexity point of view. These three case studies are representative for the wide range of uses for parameterized complexity methods for description logic problems.Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2018

    A Characterization Theorem for a Modal Description Logic

    Full text link
    Modal description logics feature modalities that capture dependence of knowledge on parameters such as time, place, or the information state of agents. E.g., the logic S5-ALC combines the standard description logic ALC with an S5-modality that can be understood as an epistemic operator or as representing (undirected) change. This logic embeds into a corresponding modal first-order logic S5-FOL. We prove a modal characterization theorem for this embedding, in analogy to results by van Benthem and Rosen relating ALC to standard first-order logic: We show that S5-ALC with only local roles is, both over finite and over unrestricted models, precisely the bisimulation invariant fragment of S5-FOL, thus giving an exact description of the expressive power of S5-ALC with only local roles

    Towards More Useful Description Logics of Time, Change and Context

    Get PDF
    Description Logics (DLs) are a family of logic-based formalisms for the representation of and reasoning about knowledge. Classical DLs are fragments of first-order logic and therefore aim at capturing static knowledge. Alas, the lack of means of DLs to capture dynamic aspects of knowledge has been often criticized because many important DL applications depend on this kind of knowledge. As a reaction to this shortcoming of DLs, two-dimensional extensions of DLs with capabilities to represent and reason about dynamic knowledge were introduced. We further, in this thesis, the understanding and utility of two-dimensional DLs. We particularly focus on identifying two-dimensional DLs providing the right expressive power to model more accurately temporal and contextual aspects of knowledge required by certain DL applications, or providing better computational properties than other possible alternatives. We pursue three lines of research: we study branching-time temporal DLs that emerge from the combination of classical DLs with the classical temporal logics CTL* and CTL; we study description logics of change that emerge from the combination of classical DLs with the modal logic S5; we study description logics of context that emerge from the combination of classical DLs with multi-modal logics. We investigate temporal and contextual DLs based on the classical DL ALC and on members of the EL-family of DLs. Our main technical contributions are algorithms for satisfiability and subsumption, and (mostly) tight complexity bounds

    Towards More Useful Description Logics of Time, Change and Context

    Get PDF
    Description Logics (DLs) are a family of logic-based formalisms for the representation of and reasoning about knowledge. Classical DLs are fragments of first-order logic and therefore aim at capturing static knowledge. Alas, the lack of means of DLs to capture dynamic aspects of knowledge has been often criticized because many important DL applications depend on this kind of knowledge. As a reaction to this shortcoming of DLs, two-dimensional extensions of DLs with capabilities to represent and reason about dynamic knowledge were introduced. We further, in this thesis, the understanding and utility of two-dimensional DLs. We particularly focus on identifying two-dimensional DLs providing the right expressive power to model more accurately temporal and contextual aspects of knowledge required by certain DL applications, or providing better computational properties than other possible alternatives. We pursue three lines of research: we study branching-time temporal DLs that emerge from the combination of classical DLs with the classical temporal logics CTL* and CTL; we study description logics of change that emerge from the combination of classical DLs with the modal logic S5; we study description logics of context that emerge from the combination of classical DLs with multi-modal logics. We investigate temporal and contextual DLs based on the classical DL ALC and on members of the EL-family of DLs. Our main technical contributions are algorithms for satisfiability and subsumption, and (mostly) tight complexity bounds
    corecore