Only Hope remains in the PANDORA\u27s .jar - Pervasive use of planning in a training environment

This paper shortly introduces features of a software system called PANDORA-BOX. It shows a novel use of timeline-based planning as the core element in a dynamic training environment for crisis managers. A trainer is provided with a combination of planning and execution functionalities that allow him to maintain and adapt a "lesson plan" as the basis for the interaction between him and the involved trainees. The training session is based on the concept of Scenario, a set of events and connected possibilities that shape an abstract plan proposed to trainees through a timeline-based system. The PANDORA architecture provides a continuous reactive loop around trainees, and, additionally allows the trainer to directly intervene in the ongoing session giving him a complete, general and advanced view about the evolution of the Scenario

Supporting Increment Planning Processes within the ULISSE Framework

ULISSE is an EU project whose aim is data valorization around the ISS experiments. The ULISSE software platform is endowed with a number of additional services to improve both data production and data analysis. This paper describes the Planning and Scheduling Service, a module developed to support functions of data production around the ISS activities and integrated in the ULISSE platform. Its current use to support work for the Fluid Science Laboratory facility is also shown and fully analyzed from design to application service delivery

Opening the PANDORA-BOX: Planning and Executing Timelines in a Training Environment

This paper introduces a novel use of timeline-based planning as the core element within a dynamic training environment designed for crisis managers. Training for crisis decision makers at the strategic level poses a number of challenges that range from the necessity to foster creative decision making to the need for the creation of engaging and realistic scenarios in support of experiential learning. This article describes our efforts to build an end-to-end system, called the PANDORA BOX, that helps the trainer to populate and deliver a continuous 4-5 hours training session encompassing exercises that encourage a group of decision makers to achieve joint decisions. Specifically the emphasis is given to (a) the timeline-based representation as the core component for creating training sessions and unifying different concepts of the PANDORA domain; (b) the combination of planning and execution functionalities required to maintain and dynamically adapt a "lesson plan" on the basis of both trainee-trainer interaction and individual behaviors and performance; (c) the importance of keeping the trainer in close control of the activity loop

Toward a general purpose software environment for timeline-based planning

Timeline-based Planning and Scheduling applications have been successfully deployed in various contexts. Often such applications use specific solving algorithms and cannot be easily applied for solving different kind of problems. Then, an open research issue for such planning modeling is the one of creating a software infrastructure with a controllable search engine. In this regard, this paper presents an attempt to synthesize such a software environment. The Extensible Planning and Scheduling Library (EPSL) evolves from the Timeline Representation Framework (APSI-TRF), a software environment supported by the European Space Agency. Goal of EPSL is to obtain a software architecture having the flexibility to focus on specific problem solving aspects. The paper is an initial report on this effort: it introduces the whole idea, then focuses on the definition of suitable heuristic functions, and presents experiments related to two domains generated by current applications

A comparative analysis of algorithms for satellite operations scheduling

Scheduling is employed in everyday life, ranging from meetings to manufacturing and operations among other activities. One instance of scheduling in a complex real-life setting is space mission operations scheduling, i.e. instructing a satellite to perform fitting tasks during predefined time periods with a varied frequency to achieve its mission goals. Mission operations scheduling is pivotal to the success of any space mission, choreographing every task carefully, accounting for technological and environmental limitations and constraints along with mission goals.;It remains standard practice to this day, to generate operations schedules manually ,i.e. to collect requirements from individual stakeholders, collate them into a timeline, compare against feasibility and available satellite resources, and find potential conflicts. Conflict resolution is done by hand, checked by a simulator and uplinked to the satellite weekly. This process is time consuming, bears risks and can be considered sub-optimal.;A pertinent question arises: can we automate the process of satellite mission operations scheduling? And if we can, what method should be used to generate the schedules? In an attempt to address this question, a comparison of algorithms was deemed suitable in order to explore their suitability for this particular application.;The problem of mission operations scheduling was initially studied through literature and numerous interviews with experts. A framework was developed to approximate a generic Low Earth Orbit satellite, its environment and its mission requirements. Optimisation algorithms were chosen from different categories such as single-point stochastic without memory (Simulated Annealing, Random Search), multi-point stochastic with memory (Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony System, Differential Evolution) and were run both with and without Local Search.;The aforementioned algorithmic set was initially tuned using a single 89-minute Low Earth Orbit of a scientific mission to Mars. It was then applied to scheduling operations during one high altitude Low Earth Orbit (2.4hrs) of an experimental mission.;It was then applied to a realistic test-case inspired by the European Space Agency PROBA-2 mission, comprising a 1 day schedule and subsequently a 7 day schedule - equal to a Short Term Plan as defined by the European Space Agency.;The schedule fitness - corresponding to the Hamming distance between mission requirements and generated schedule - are presented along with the execution time of each run. Algorithmic performance is discussed and put at the disposal of mission operations experts for consideration.Scheduling is employed in everyday life, ranging from meetings to manufacturing and operations among other activities. One instance of scheduling in a complex real-life setting is space mission operations scheduling, i.e. instructing a satellite to perform fitting tasks during predefined time periods with a varied frequency to achieve its mission goals. Mission operations scheduling is pivotal to the success of any space mission, choreographing every task carefully, accounting for technological and environmental limitations and constraints along with mission goals.;It remains standard practice to this day, to generate operations schedules manually ,i.e. to collect requirements from individual stakeholders, collate them into a timeline, compare against feasibility and available satellite resources, and find potential conflicts. Conflict resolution is done by hand, checked by a simulator and uplinked to the satellite weekly. This process is time consuming, bears risks and can be considered sub-optimal.;A pertinent question arises: can we automate the process of satellite mission operations scheduling? And if we can, what method should be used to generate the schedules? In an attempt to address this question, a comparison of algorithms was deemed suitable in order to explore their suitability for this particular application.;The problem of mission operations scheduling was initially studied through literature and numerous interviews with experts. A framework was developed to approximate a generic Low Earth Orbit satellite, its environment and its mission requirements. Optimisation algorithms were chosen from different categories such as single-point stochastic without memory (Simulated Annealing, Random Search), multi-point stochastic with memory (Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony System, Differential Evolution) and were run both with and without Local Search.;The aforementioned algorithmic set was initially tuned using a single 89-minute Low Earth Orbit of a scientific mission to Mars. It was then applied to scheduling operations during one high altitude Low Earth Orbit (2.4hrs) of an experimental mission.;It was then applied to a realistic test-case inspired by the European Space Agency PROBA-2 mission, comprising a 1 day schedule and subsequently a 7 day schedule - equal to a Short Term Plan as defined by the European Space Agency.;The schedule fitness - corresponding to the Hamming distance between mission requirements and generated schedule - are presented along with the execution time of each run. Algorithmic performance is discussed and put at the disposal of mission operations experts for consideration

Enabling Astronaut Self-Scheduling using a Robust Advanced Modelling and Scheduling system: an assessment during a Mars analogue mission

Human long duration exploration missions (LDEMs) raise a number of technological challenges. This paper addresses the question of the crew autonomy: as the distances increase, the communication delays and constraints tend to prevent the astronauts from being monitored and supported by a real time ground control. Eventually, future planetary missions will necessarily require a form of astronaut self-scheduling. We study the usage of a computer decision-support tool by a crew of analog astronauts, during a Mars simulation mission conducted at the Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS, Mars Society) in Utah. The proposed tool, called Romie, belongs to the new category of Robust Advanced Modelling and Scheduling (RAMS) systems. It allows the crew members (i) to visually model their scientific objectives and constraints, (ii) to compute near-optimal operational schedules while taking uncertainty into account, (iii) to monitor the execution of past and current activities, and (iv) to modify scientific objectives/constraints w.r.t. unforeseen events and opportunistic science. In this study, we empirically measure how the astronauts, who are novice planners, perform at using such a tool when self-scheduling under the realistic assumptions of a simulated Martian planetary habitat

Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling with Autonomous Learning Effects

It\u27s commonly assumed that experience leads to efficiency, yet this is largely unaccounted for in resource-constrained project scheduling. This thesis considers the idea that learning effects could allow selected activities to be completed within reduced time, if they\u27re scheduled after activities where workers learn relevant skills. This paper computationally explores the effect of this autonomous, intra-project learning on optimal makespan and problem difficulty. A learning extension is proposed to the standard RCPSP scheduling problem. Multiple parameters are considered, including project size, learning frequency, and learning intensity. A test instance generator is developed to adapt the popular PSPLIB library of scheduling problems to this model. Four different Constraint Programming model formulations are developed to efficiently solve the model. Bounding techniques are proposed for tightening optimality gaps, including four lower bounding model relaxations, an upper bounding model relaxation, and a Destructive Lower Bounding method. Hundreds of thousands of scenarios are tested to empirically determine the most efficient solution approaches and the impact of learning on project schedules. Potential makespan reduction as high as 50% is discovered, with the learning effects resembling a learning curve with a point of diminishing returns. A combination of bounding techniques is proven to produce significantly tighter optimality gaps

Task scheduling and merging in space and time

Every day, robots are being deployed in more challenging environments, where they are required to perform complex tasks. In order to achieve these tasks, robots rely on intelligent deliberation algorithms. In this thesis, we study two deliberation approaches – task scheduling and task planning. We extend these approaches in order to not only deal with temporal and spatial constraints imposed by the environment, but also exploit them to be more efficient than the state-of-the-art approaches. Our first main contribution is a scheduler that exploits a heuristic based on Allen’s interval algebra to prune the search space to be traversed by a mixed integer program. We empirically show that the proposed scheduler outperforms the state of the art by at least one order of magnitude. Furthermore, the scheduler has been deployed on several mobile robots in long-term autonomy scenarios. Our second main contribution is the POPMERX algorithm, which is based on merging of partially ordered temporal plans. POPMERX first reasons with the spatial and temporal structure of separately generated plans. Then, it merges these plans into a single final plan, while optimising the makespan of the merged plan. We empirically show that POPMERX produces better plans that the-state-ofthe- art planners on temporal domains with time windows

Temporal and Hierarchical Models for Planning and Acting in Robotics

The field of AI planning has seen rapid progress over the last decade and planners are now able to find plan with hundreds of actions in a matter of seconds. Despite those important progresses, robotic systems still tend to have a reactive architecture with very little deliberation on the course of the plan they might follow. In this thesis, we argue that a successful integration with a robotic system requires the planner to have capacities for both temporal and hierarchical reasoning. The former is indeed a universal resource central in many robot activities while the latter is a critical component for the integration of reasoning capabilities at different abstraction levels, typically starting with a high level view of an activity that is iteratively refined down to motion primitives. As a first step to carry out this vision, we present a model for temporal planning unifying the generative and hierarchical approaches. At the center of the model are temporal action templates, similar to those of PDDL complemented with a specification of the initial state as well as the expected evolution of the environment over time. In addition, our model allows for the specification of hierarchical knowledge possibly with a partial coverage. Consequently, our model generalizes the existing generative and HTN approaches together with an explicit time representation. In the second chapter, we introduce a planning procedure suitable for our planning model. In order to support hierarchical features, we extend the existing Partial-Order Causal Link approach used in many constraintbased planners, with the notions of task and decomposition. We implement it in FAPE (Flexible Acting and Planning Environment) together with automated problem analysis techniques used for search guidance. We show FAPE to have performance similar to state of the art temporal planners when used in a generative setting. The addition of hierarchical information leads to further performance gain and allows us to outperform traditional planners. In the third chapter, we study the usual methods used to reason on temporal uncertainty while planning. We relax the usual assumption of total observability and instead provide techniques to reason on the observations needed to maintain a plan dispatchable. We show how such needed observations can be detected at planning time and incrementally dealt with by considering the appropriate sensing actions. In a final chapter, we discuss the place of the proposed planning system as a central component for the control of a robotic actor. We demonstrate how the explicit time representation facilitates plan monitoring and action dispatching when dealing with contingent events that require observation. We take advantage of the constraint-based and hierarchical representation to facilitate both plan-repair procedures as well opportunistic plan refinement at acting time

Verification and Validation of Planning Domain Models

The verification and validation of planning domain models is one of the biggest challenges to deploying planning-based automated systems in the real world.The state-of-the-art verification methods of planning domain models are vulnerable to false positives, i.e. counterexamples that are unreachable by sound planners when using the domain under verification during planning tasks. False positives mislead designers into believing correct models are faulty. Consequently, designers needlessly debug correct models to remove these false positives. This process might unnecessarily constrain planning domain models, which can eradicate valid and sometimes required behaviours. Moreover, catching and debugging errors without knowing they are false positives can give verification engineers a false sense of achievement, which might cause them to overlook valid errors.To address this shortfall, the first part of this thesis introduces goal-constrained planning domain model verification, a novel approach that constrains the verification of planning domain models with planning goals to reduce the number of unreachable planning counterexamples. This thesis formally proves the correctness of this method and demonstrates the application of this approach using the model checker Spin and the planner MIPS-XXL. Furthermore, it reports the empirical experiments that validate the feasibility and investigates the performance of the goal-constrained verification approach. The experiments show that not only the goal-constrained verification method is robust against false positive errors, but it also outperforms under-constrained verification tasks in terms of time and memory in some cases.The second part of this thesis investigates the problem of validating the functional equivalence of planning domain models. The need for techniques to validate the functional equivalence of planning domain models has been highlighted in previous research and has applications in model learning, development and extension. Despite the need and importance of proving the functional equivalence of planning domain models, this problem attracted limited research interest.This thesis builds on and extends previous research by proposing a novel approach to validate the functional equivalence of planning domain models. First, this approach employs a planner to remove redundant operators from the given domain models; then, it uses a Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solver to check if a predicate mapping exists between the two domain models that makes them functionally equivalent. The soundness and completeness of this functional equivalence validation method are formally proven in this thesis.Furthermore, this thesis introduces D-VAL, the first planning domain model automatic validation tool. D-VAL uses the FF planner and the Z3 SMT solver to prove the functional equivalence of planning domain models. Moreover, this thesis demonstrates the feasibility and evaluates the performance of D-VAL against thirteen planning domain models from the International Planning Competition (IPC). Empirical evaluation shows that D-VAL validates the functional equivalence of the most challenging task in less than 43 seconds. These experiments and their results provide a benchmark to evaluate the feasibility and performance of future related work