49,883 research outputs found

    Minimal spanning forests

    Full text link
    Minimal spanning forests on infinite graphs are weak limits of minimal spanning trees from finite subgraphs. These limits can be taken with free or wired boundary conditions and are denoted FMSF (free minimal spanning forest) and WMSF (wired minimal spanning forest), respectively. The WMSF is also the union of the trees that arise from invasion percolation started at all vertices. We show that on any Cayley graph where critical percolation has no infinite clusters, all the component trees in the WMSF have one end a.s. In Zd\mathbb{Z}^d this was proved by Alexander [Ann. Probab. 23 (1995) 87--104], but a different method is needed for the nonamenable case. We also prove that the WMSF components are ``thin'' in a different sense, namely, on any graph, each component tree in the WMSF has pc=1p_{\mathrm{c}}=1 a.s., where pcp_{\mathrm{c}} denotes the critical probability for having an infinite cluster in Bernoulli percolation. On the other hand, the FMSF is shown to be ``thick'': on any connected graph, the union of the FMSF and independent Bernoulli percolation (with arbitrarily small parameter) is a.s. connected. In conjunction with a recent result of Gaboriau, this implies that in any Cayley graph, the expected degree of the FMSF is at least the expected degree of the FSF (the weak limit of uniform spanning trees). We also show that the number of infinite clusters for Bernoulli(pup_{\mathrm{u}}) percolation is at most the number of components of the FMSF, where pup_{\mathrm{u}} denotes the critical probability for having a unique infinite cluster. Finally, an example is given to show that the minimal spanning tree measure does not have negative associations.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009117906000000269 in the Annals of Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aop/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    Spanning trees of 3-uniform hypergraphs

    Full text link
    Masbaum and Vaintrob's "Pfaffian matrix tree theorem" implies that counting spanning trees of a 3-uniform hypergraph (abbreviated to 3-graph) can be done in polynomial time for a class of "3-Pfaffian" 3-graphs, comparable to and related to the class of Pfaffian graphs. We prove a complexity result for recognizing a 3-Pfaffian 3-graph and describe two large classes of 3-Pfaffian 3-graphs -- one of these is given by a forbidden subgraph characterization analogous to Little's for bipartite Pfaffian graphs, and the other consists of a class of partial Steiner triple systems for which the property of being 3-Pfaffian can be reduced to the property of an associated graph being Pfaffian. We exhibit an infinite set of partial Steiner triple systems that are not 3-Pfaffian, none of which can be reduced to any other by deletion or contraction of triples. We also find some necessary or sufficient conditions for the existence of a spanning tree of a 3-graph (much more succinct than can be obtained by the currently fastest polynomial-time algorithm of Gabow and Stallmann for finding a spanning tree) and a superexponential lower bound on the number of spanning trees of a Steiner triple system.Comment: 34 pages, 9 figure

    Uniqueness of maximal entropy measure on essential spanning forests

    Full text link
    An essential spanning forest of an infinite graph GG is a spanning forest of GG in which all trees have infinitely many vertices. Let GnG_n be an increasing sequence of finite connected subgraphs of GG for which Gn=G\bigcup G_n=G. Pemantle's arguments imply that the uniform measures on spanning trees of GnG_n converge weakly to an Aut(G)\operatorname {Aut}(G)-invariant measure μG\mu_G on essential spanning forests of GG. We show that if GG is a connected, amenable graph and ΓAut(G)\Gamma \subset \operatorname {Aut}(G) acts quasitransitively on GG, then μG\mu_G is the unique Γ\Gamma-invariant measure on essential spanning forests of GG for which the specific entropy is maximal. This result originated with Burton and Pemantle, who gave a short but incorrect proof in the case ΓZd\Gamma\cong\mathbb{Z}^d. Lyons discovered the error and asked about the more general statement that we prove.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009117905000000765 in the Annals of Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aop/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    The scaling limits of the Minimal Spanning Tree and Invasion Percolation in the plane

    Get PDF
    We prove that the Minimal Spanning Tree and the Invasion Percolation Tree on a version of the triangular lattice in the complex plane have unique scaling limits, which are invariant under rotations, scalings, and, in the case of the MST, also under translations. However, they are not expected to be conformally invariant. We also prove some geometric properties of the limiting MST. The topology of convergence is the space of spanning trees introduced by Aizenman, Burchard, Newman & Wilson (1999), and the proof relies on the existence and conformal covariance of the scaling limit of the near-critical percolation ensemble, established in our earlier works.Comment: 56 pages, 21 figures. A thoroughly revised versio
    corecore