Recent Advances in Forest Observation with Visual Interpretation of Very High-Resolution Imagery

The land area covered by freely available very high-resolution (VHR) imagery has grown dramatically over recent years, which has considerable relevance for forest observation and monitoring. For example, it is possible to recognize and extract a number of features related to forest type, forest management, degradation and disturbance using VHR imagery. Moreover, time series of medium-to-high-resolution imagery such as MODIS, Landsat or Sentinel has allowed for monitoring of parameters related to forest cover change. Although automatic classification is used regularly to monitor forests using medium-resolution imagery, VHR imagery and changes in web-based technology have opened up new possibilities for the role of visual interpretation in forest observation. Visual interpretation of VHR is typically employed to provide training and/or validation data for other remote sensing-based techniques or to derive statistics directly on forest cover/forest cover change over large regions. Hence, this paper reviews the state of the art in tools designed for visual interpretation of VHR, including Geo-Wiki, LACO-Wiki and Collect Earth as well as issues related to interpretation of VHR imagery and approaches to quality assurance. We have also listed a number of success stories where visual interpretation plays a crucial role, including a global forest mask harmonized with FAO FRA country statistics; estimation of dryland forest area; quantification of deforestation; national reporting to the UNFCCC; and drivers of forest change

A global analysis of the spatial and temporal variability of usable Landsat observations at the pixel scale

The Landsat program has the longest collection of moderate-resolution satellite imagery, and the data are free to everyone. With the improvements of standardized image products, the flexibility of cloud computing platforms, and the development of time series approaches, it is now possible to conduct global-scale analyses of time series using Landsat data over multiple decades. Efforts in this regard are limited by the density of usable observations. The availability of usable Landsat Tier 1 observations at the scale of individual pixels from the perspective of time series analysis for land change monitoring is remarkably variable both in space (globally) and time (1985–2020), depending most immediately on which sensors were in operation, the technical capabilities of the mission, and the acquisition strategies and objectives of the satellite operators (e.g., USGS, commercial company) and the international ground receiving stations. Additionally, analysis of data density at the pixel scale allows for the integration of quality control data on clouds, cloud shadows, and snow as well as other properties returned from the atmospheric correction process. Maps for different time periods show the effect of excluding observations based on the presence of clouds, cloud shadows, snow, sensor saturation, hazy observations (based on atmospheric opacity), and lack of aerosol optical depth information. Two major discoveries are: 1) that filtering saturated and hazy pixels is helpful to reduce noise in the time series, although the impact may vary across different continents; 2) the atmospheric opacity band needs to be used with caution because many images are removed when no value is given in this band, when many of those observations are usable. The results provide guidance on when and where time series analysis is feasible, which will benefit many users of Landsat data.University of Connecticut; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 80NSSC20K0022 - NASA; 20-DG-11132762-017 - Department of Agriculture/Forest Service; G12PC00070 - Department of the Interior/U.S. Geological SurveyPublished versio

Improved Fine-Scale Tropical Forest Cover Mapping for Southeast Asia Using Planet-NICFI and Sentinel-1 Imagery

The accuracy of existing forest cover products typically suffers from “rounding” errors arising from classifications that estimate the fractional cover of forest in each pixel, which often exclude the presence of large, isolated trees and small or narrow forest clearings, and is primarily attributable to the moderate resolution of the imagery used to make maps. However, the degree to which such high-resolution imagery can mitigate this problem, and thereby improve large-area forest cover maps, is largely unexplored. Here, we developed an approach to map tropical forest cover at a fine scale using Planet and Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery in the Google Earth Engine platform and used it to map all of Southeastern Asia’s forest cover. The machine learning approach, based on the Random Forests models and trained and validated using a total of 37,345 labels collected from Planet imagery across the entire region, had an accuracy of 0.937 and an F1 score of 0.942, while a version based only on Planet imagery had an accuracy of 0.908 and F1 of 0.923. We compared the accuracy of our resulting maps with 5 existing forest cover products derived from medium-resolution optical-only or combined optical-SAR approaches at 3,000 randomly selected locations. We found that our approach overall achieved higher accuracy and helped minimize the rounding errors commonly found along small or narrow forest clearings and deforestation frontiers where isolated trees are common. However, the forest area estimates varied depending on topographic location and showed smaller differences in highlands (areas \u3e300 m above sea level) but obvious differences in complex lowland landscapes. Overall, the proposed method shows promise for monitoring forest changes, particularly those caused by deforestation frontiers. Our study also represents one of the most extensive applications of Planet imagery to date, resulting in an open, high-resolution map of forest cover for the entire Southeastern Asia region. © 2023 Feng Yang et al

Monitoring and quantifying forest degradation: remote sensing approaches for applied conservation in the Congo Basin

Wälder spielen global eine entscheidende Rolle bei der Regulierung des Weltklimas, da sie aktiv Kohlenstoff speichern und binden. Trotz der Bemühungen durch internationale Programme nehmen die Waldschäden weiter zu. Entwaldung und Walddegradierung sind zwei unterschiedliche Prozesse, die sich auf die globalen Wälder auswirken. Entwaldung ist eine klar definierte Umwandlung oder Abholzung der Waldflächen, während Degradierung subtiler, vorübergehend und variabel sein kann und daher schwer zu detektieren ist. Walddegradierung wird im Allgemeinen als eine funktionale Verringerung der Fähigkeit von Wäldern Ökosystemleistungen zu erbringen identifiziert. Sie wird nicht als Veränderung der Landbedeckung oder Entwaldung klassifiziert. Daraus folgt keine deutliche Verringerung der Waldfläche, sondern eher eine Abnahme der Qualität und des Zustands. Diese Veränderung kann, wie die Entwaldung dennoch mit einer signifikanten Verringerung der oberirdischen Biomasse und damit miterheblichen Treibhausgasemissionen verbunden sein. Die Schätzungen der Kohlenstoffemissionen aus Waldstörungen liegen zwischen 12 und 20 % aller weltweit emittierten Emissionen. Durch eine fehlende einheitliche Definition oder Methode zur Quantifizierung der Degradation, der Vielzahl an Einflussfaktoren und der Unsicherheit bei der Schätzung der Biomasse variieren die Werte stark. Die von der Walddegradierung betroffene Fläche könnte in der Tat viel größer sein als die der Entwaldung, die ohnehin jedes Jahr auf eine Fläche von etwa der Größe Islands geschätzt wird. Die REDD+-Mechanismen zur Finanzierung von Emissionsreduktionen zur Minderung des Klimawandels erfordern robuste, transparente und skalierbare Methoden zur Quantifizierung der Walddegradierung, zusammen mit der Erfassung der damit verbundenen Treibern. Da die Degradierung oft der Entwaldung vorausgeht, kann ein schnelles Monitoring mit einer Beurteilung der Waldschäden und ihren Treibern ein wichtiges Frühwarnsystem sein. Nur so können Maßnahmen frühzeitig ergriffen werden, die die Wälder schützen und sowohl der Natur und der Biodiversität als auch dem Lebensunterhalt, der Gesundheit und dem Wohlbefinden von Millionen von Menschen auf der ganzen Welt zugute kommen. In dieser Arbeit werden Methoden für konsistente, reproduzierbare, skalierbare und satellitengestützte Indikatoren zur Identifizierung und Quantifizierung verschiedener Arten von Walddegradation um zukünftige Risiko- und Politikszenarien zu unterstützen.Global forests play a crucial role in regulating global climate by actively storing and sequestering carbon. Despite efforts to mitigate climate through international efforts, human-caused forest disturbance and forest-related greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise. Deforestation and forest degradation are two different processes affecting global forests. Deforestation is a clearly defined conversion or removal of forest cover, while degradation can be more subtle, temporary, variable, and therefore difficult to detect. Forest degradation is generally identified as a functional reduction in the capacity of forests to provide ecosystem services, that does not qualify as a change in land cover or forest clearing. That means no clear reduction of the forest area, but rather a decrease in quality and condition. This change, like deforestation can still be associated with significant reductions in above-ground biomass and therefore considerable greenhouse gas emissions. Estimates of carbon emissions from forest degradation and disturbance range anywhere from 12-20% of all emissions emitted globally with values varying widely because of a lack of uniform definition or method for quantifying degradation, the broad number of influencing factors, and uncertainty in biomass estimates. The area affected by forest degradation could in fact be much larger than that of deforestation, which is already estimated to be an area about the size of Iceland every year. The REDD+ mechanisms of financing emissions reductions to mitigate climate change require robust, transparent and scalable methods for quantifying degradation, along with a quantification of associated direct drivers. Furthermore, as degradation often precedes deforestation, timely monitoring and assessment of forest degradation and changes in drivers can provide crucial early warning to engage interventions to keep forests intact, benefitting nature and biodiversity as well as the livelihoods, health and well-being of millions of people around the world. This research proposes methods for consistent, repeatable and scalable satellite-derived indicators for identifying and quantifying different types of forest degradation and its causes to inform future risk and policy scenarios