8,833 research outputs found
The C++0x "Concepts" Effort
C++0x is the working title for the revision of the ISO standard of the C++
programming language that was originally planned for release in 2009 but that
was delayed to 2011. The largest language extension in C++0x was "concepts",
that is, a collection of features for constraining template parameters. In
September of 2008, the C++ standards committee voted the concepts extension
into C++0x, but then in July of 2009, the committee voted the concepts
extension back out of C++0x.
This article is my account of the technical challenges and debates within the
"concepts" effort in the years 2003 to 2009. To provide some background, the
article also describes the design space for constrained parametric
polymorphism, or what is colloquially know as constrained generics. While this
article is meant to be generally accessible, the writing is aimed toward
readers with background in functional programming and programming language
theory. This article grew out of a lecture at the Spring School on Generic and
Indexed Programming at the University of Oxford, March 2010
Towards an Achievable Performance for the Loop Nests
Numerous code optimization techniques, including loop nest optimizations,
have been developed over the last four decades. Loop optimization techniques
transform loop nests to improve the performance of the code on a target
architecture, including exposing parallelism. Finding and evaluating an
optimal, semantic-preserving sequence of transformations is a complex problem.
The sequence is guided using heuristics and/or analytical models and there is
no way of knowing how close it gets to optimal performance or if there is any
headroom for improvement. This paper makes two contributions. First, it uses a
comparative analysis of loop optimizations/transformations across multiple
compilers to determine how much headroom may exist for each compiler. And
second, it presents an approach to characterize the loop nests based on their
hardware performance counter values and a Machine Learning approach that
predicts which compiler will generate the fastest code for a loop nest. The
prediction is made for both auto-vectorized, serial compilation and for
auto-parallelization. The results show that the headroom for state-of-the-art
compilers ranges from 1.10x to 1.42x for the serial code and from 1.30x to
1.71x for the auto-parallelized code. These results are based on the Machine
Learning predictions.Comment: Accepted at the 31st International Workshop on Languages and
Compilers for Parallel Computing (LCPC 2018
- …