774 research outputs found

    Scaling-up vaccine production: implementation aspects of a biomass growth observer and controller

    Get PDF
    Abstract This study considers two aspects of the implementation of a biomass growth observer and specific growth rate controller in scale-up from small- to pilot-scale bioreactors towards a feasible bulk production process for whole-cell vaccine against whooping cough. The first is the calculation of the oxygen uptake rate, the starting point for online monitoring and control of biomass growth, taking into account the dynamics in the gas-phase. Mixing effects and delays are caused by amongst others the headspace and tubing to the analyzer. These gas phase dynamics are modelled using knowledge of the system in order to reconstruct oxygen consumption. The second aspect is to evaluate performance of the monitoring and control system with the required modifications of the oxygen consumption calculation on pilot-scale. In pilot-scale fed-batch cultivation good monitoring and control performance is obtained enabling a doubled concentration of bulk vaccine compared to standard batch productio

    Control and identification in activated sludge processes = Regeling en identifikatie in aktief-slib processen

    Get PDF
    This thesis is about control and identification in activated sludge processes (ASP's). The chapters in this thesis are divided in two parts. Part I deals with the development of the best feasible, close-to-optimal adaptive receding horizon optimal controller (RHOC) for N-removal in a continuously mixed alternating activated sludge process reactor. Subsequently this controller and the most common existing controllers are mutually compared by means of simulations. In addition the application of the close-to-optimal RHOC controller to a system of two hydraulically connected alternating reactors is simulated for a range of plant designs within this class. In this way the combination of design and operation is optimized. Part II concerns identification on the basis of DO-measurements and respirometry. First the DO-dynamics in a continuously mixed ASP reactor are identified, including the non-linear relation between k L a and q air . Subsequenly the dynamics of a (DO-sensor based) continuous flow respirometer are identified by exciting its dynamics.In chapter 1 the principles of the N-removing ASP are shortly explained. The new problem of total-N removal is discussed. The general features of the ASP control problem are listed: disturbance attenuation, storm events, process uncertainty and variation, multiple time-scales. Special attention is paid to the potential of RHOC. The literature with respect to operational aspects of N-removal as well as the use of DO-sensors and respirometers in ASP operation is coarsely reviewed. It is argued that the anoxic periods approach for N-removal offers two principle advantages over the anoxic zones approach: excitation of dynamics and no need for internal recirculation. Some problems in the field are indicated. With respect to DO-sensors it is illustrated that the challenges today are in the field of extracting not only DO but also additional information from its readings. All experiments in this thesis have been carried out at a pilot scale ASP. A description of this pilot plant is given in chapter 1. The chapter ends with the formulation of research objectives and the thesis outline.Chapters 2 till 5 present the design procedure for the adaptive RHOC for control of NH 4 and NO x , though not exactly chronologically. The first step is presented in chapter 4, it concerns application of optimal control to the N-removal part of the generally accepted Activated Sludge Model no. 1. From this optimal control study it occurs that alternating nitrification/denitrification, as opposed to simultaneous nitrification/denitrification, may be optimal indeed. This, together with the risk of sludge bulking at limiting DO-values, justifies the limitation to alternating process operation. To implement an optimal control strategy on-line the receding horizon principle is needed, leading to RHOC. RHOC uses an internal process model for short term predictions. Hence a computationally efficient process model is required. Such a model is developed in chapter 2 by capturing the slower process dynamics in time-varying model parameters. It is taken into account that the model structure must be suited for recursive identification of the time-varying model parameters from the measurements.RHOC, like any model predictive controller, computes the current controls on the basis of model predictions upto horizon H . Hence the sum of squared 1, 2, .., H -step ahead prediction errors is a natural identification criterion. In chapter 2 this idea is postulated and applied to NH 4 /NO x measurements collected from the pilot scale ASP described in chapter 1. H appears to affect the parameter estimates significantly, supporting the idea that use of this new identification criterion will improve MPC performance in general.In chapter 4 RHOC with this simple model is applied to the pilot plant's alternating reactor. The controller successfully passed several tests, but it also appeared that the performance of this controller is suboptimal due to inaccurate model predictions. This was to be expected, as the simplicity of the N-removal model in chapter 2 has been achieved by capturing the slower process dynamics in the model parameters, while in this stage they are not recursively estimated.The results of chapter 4 illustrate that recursive identification of (some of the) model parameters is required to keep the model uptodate. Chapter 3 presents the algorithm for recursive identification of those model parameters. The Kalman filter is used, because it has the attractive feature that the filter gain accompanying non-identifiable parameters ( e.g. the nitrification rate during anoxic periods) increases linearly in time. It is proven that this increase of the filter gain will not cause instability during normal process operation. The method performs excellently on real data.Chapter 5 concerns adaptive RHOC of N-removal in alternating ASP reactors, being the combination of the recursively identified model in chapter 3 and the RHOC controller in chapter 4. Although stability of the nonlinear RHOC feedback controller has not been proven, not to mention its combination with recursive identification, only one source of instability was encountered in many experiments. This is the scenario in which NH 4 dominates the objective functional, its setpoint is zero and the estimated rate of nitrification has become negative for whatever reason. In that case the controller will keep aeration off to prevent the predicted production of NH 4 , as a consequence no new information to update the estimated nitrification rate is obtained and the deadlock is there. Obviously this scenario is easy to prevent and does not occur under normal operating conditions.In chapter 4 the unusual observation is done that the RHOC performance is nearly invariant to its prediction horizon. This triggered a study on the cause of this phenomena and an effort to generalize the results as far as possible, the results are presented in chapter 6. It has led to the derivation of an l 1 -norm optimal state feedback controller for 2-dimensional linear time invariant systems with decoupled dynamics and a single control input.In chapter 7 the close-to-optimal adaptive RHOC of chapter 5 and three existing control strategies (timers, NH 4 -bounds based and ORP, Oxidation Reduction Potential, based) for N-removal in continuously mixed alternating reactors are compared by means of simulation. The simulations are carried out in SIMBA TM, a commercially available application within the MATLAB/SIMULINK TMenvironment, based on the Activated Sludge Model no. 1. Drawback of simulations is that the dynamics of both the sensors and the process need to be modelled. And even the best model of the ASP is nothing but a poor resemblance of the real process. However, a fair experimental comparison of multiple controllers is impossible, not only for financial reasons. Simultaneous experimental testing would require the availability of multiple identical plants in parallel. Sequential testing on one plant would disrupt the results by changes in process conditions and influent, disabling a mutual comparison. Hence simulation is the best way to compare different control-schemes. It appears that three totally different controllers (timers, NH 4 -bounds based and adaptive RHOC) can achieve a more or less equal performance, if tuned optimally. Adaptive RHOC turns out to be superior in terms of sensitivity to suboptimal tunings. The timers approach is attractive for its simplicity, but very sensitive to suboptimal tuning.Chapter 8 describes a simulation study with the scope to optimise the plant design and operation strategy of alternating activated sludge processes for N-removal with two hydraulically connected reactors. The methodology is to simulate the application of RHOC to a range of different plant designs within this class of systems. The RHOC algorithm is obtained by reformulating the controller of chapter 4 for a 2-reactors system. It appears that in the optimal process design the two reactors are placed in series, the first reactor is about four times as large as the second one. A conceptually simple feedback controller straightforwardly implements the improved operation strategy. The results of this chapter strongly advocate the simulation of optimal control applied to complex process models. The results are unexpected and indicate a significant outperformance of the current operation strategy. This kind of simulation studies at least serves as an ideas generator.Chapter 9 presents a grey-box modelling approach for the identification of the nonlinear DO dynamics. Herein, singular value decomposition of the locally available Jacobian matrix, or equivalently eigenvalue decomposition of the parameter covariance matrix, as well as parameter transformation are essential techniques. The use of respiration rate measurements greatly simplifies the modelling procedure. The approach is amongst others capable of identifying the non-linear function k L a ( q air ), i.e. the relationship between k L a and the aeration input signal q air . This is especially valuable in experimental identification of the relationship between k L a ( q air ) and the design of (newly developed) aeration equipment, the use of specific carrier materials in aerated reactors, or the presence of certain detergents. After all a higher k L a at a given q air results in a higher efficiency of energy usage for aeration, and hence identification of k L a ( q air ) for newly developed equipment can yield important sales arguments.Chapters 10 and 11 both deal with excitation of the respiration chamber dynamics in a continuous flow respirometer with the objective to extract additional information from its dissolved oxygen (DO) sensor readings. Chapter 10 is an effort to improve the accuracy of the BOD st -estimation technique developed by Spanjers et al . (1994). Contrary to expectation, the estimates still suffer from unacceptable inaccuracy due to large parameter correlation. However, a slight modification in the measurement strategy is proposed which is expected to enable more accurate estimation. The results of experiments with this modified measurement strategy are reported in chapter 11. The estimation results convincingly discourage further efforts to identify sludge kinetics and BOD st from this type of experiments.The two other objectives of chapter 11 are the identification of the DO-sensor dynamics and the dilution rate in a continuous flow respirometer by excitation of the respiration chamber dynamics. Two separate simple procedures are presented. Both procedures consist of on-purpose in-sensor experiments succeeded by an ordinary least squares estimation step. The feasibility of both procedures is verified in experiments with activated sludge, fed with municipal wastewater. Large experimental data sets are presented, which strongly advocate the on-line incorporation of both procedures in the everyday operation of the respirometer.In chapter 12 those conclusions drawn in the individual chapters which are of direct relevance to practitioners are summarized. Moreover some remaining ideas, which I believe are novel and likely to be succesfull, are shortly expounded in chapter 12 as well. The ideas concern: 1) Meeting N-total effluent standards by permitting elevated effluent NH 4 ; 2) Control explicitly aiming at meeting yearly averaged effluent standards; 3) The use of pH-measurements for continuous on-line tuning of timers in a timer-based operation strategy for alternating N-removal in a continuously mixed ASP reactor.</p

    Instrumentation and control of anaerobic digestion processes: a review and some research challenges

    Full text link
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9382-6[EN] To enhance energy production from methane or resource recovery from digestate, anaerobic digestion processes require advanced instrumentation and control tools. Over the years, research on these topics has evolved and followed the main fields of application of anaerobic digestion processes: from municipal sewage sludge to liquid mainly industrial then municipal organic fraction of solid waste and agricultural residues. Time constants of the processes have also changed with respect to the treated waste from minutes or hours to weeks or months. Since fast closed loop control is needed for short time constant processes, human operator is now included in the loop when taking decisions to optimize anaerobic digestion plants dealing with complex solid waste over a long retention time. Control objectives have also moved from the regulation of key variables measured online to the prediction of overall process perfor- mance based on global off-line measurements to optimize the feeding of the processes. Additionally, the need for more accurate prediction of methane production and organic matter biodegradation has impacted the complexity of instrumentation and should include a more detailed characterization of the waste (e.g., biochemical fractions like proteins, lipids and carbohydrates)andtheirbioaccessibility andbiodegradability characteristics. However, even if in the literature several methodologies have been developed to determine biodegradability based on organic matter characterization, only a few papers deal with bioaccessibility assessment. In this review, we emphasize the high potential of some promising techniques, such as spectral analysis, and we discuss issues that could appear in the near future concerning control of AD processes.The authors acknowledge the financial support of INRA (the French National Institute for Agricultural Research), the French National Research Agency (ANR) for the "Phycover" project (project ANR-14-CE04-0011) and ADEME for Inter-laboratory assay financial support.Jimenez, J.; Latrille, E.; Harmand, J.; Robles MartĂ­nez, Á.; Ferrer Polo, J.; Gaida, D.; Wolf, C.... (2015). Instrumentation and control of anaerobic digestion processes: a review and some research challenges. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 14(4):615-648. doi:10.1007/s11157-015-9382-6S615648144Aceves-Lara CA, Latrille E, Steyer JP (2010) Optimal control of hydrogen production in a continuous anaerobic fermentation bioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35:10710–10718Aguado D, Montoya T, Ferrer J, Seco A (2006) Relating ions concentration variations to conductivity variations in a sequencing batch reactor operated for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Environ Modell Softw 21:845–851Aguilar-Garnica E, Dochain D, Alcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, GonzĂĄlez-Álvarez V (2009) A multivariable control scheme in a two-stage anaerobic digestion system described by partial differential equations. J Process Contr 19:1324–1332Ahring BK, Angelidaki I, Johansen K (1992) Anaerobic treatment of manure together with industrial waste. Water Sci Technol 25:311–318Ajeej A, Thanikal JV, Narayanan CM, Senthil Kumar R (2015) An overview of bio augmentation of methane by anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sludge along with microalgae and waste paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:270–276Alcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, GonzĂĄlez-Álvarez V (2007) Selected topics in dynamics and control of chemical and biological processes. Springer, BerlinAlcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, Harmand J, Rapaport A, Steyer JP, GonzĂĄlez-Álvarez V, Pelayo-Ortiz C (2005a) Robust interval-based regulation for anaerobic digestion processes. Water Sci Technol 52:449–456Alcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, Salazar-Peña R, GonzĂĄlez-Alvarez V, GouzĂ© JL, Steyer JP (2005b) A tunable multivariable nonlinear robust observer for biological systems. C R Biol 328:317–325Alferes J, Irizar I (2010) Combination of extremum-seeking algorithms with effective hydraulic handling of equalization tanks to control anaerobic digesters. Water Sci Technol 61:2825–2834Alferes J, GarcĂ­a-Heras JL, Roca E, GarcĂ­a C, Irizar I (2008) Integration of equalisation tanks within control strategies for anaerobic reactors. Validation based on ADM1 simulations. Water Sci Technol 57:747–752Alimahmoodi M, Mulligan CN (2008) Anaerobic bioconversion of carbon dioxide to biogas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 58:95–103Alvarez JA, Otero L, Lema JM (2010) A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Bioresour Technol 101:1153–1158Alvarez-Ramirez J, Meraz M, Monroy O, Velasco A (2002) Feedback control design for an anaerobic digestion process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:725–734Anderson GK, Yang G (1992) Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration. Water Environ Res 64:53–59Andrews JF, Graef SP (1971) Dynamic modelling and simulation of the AD process. Advances in chemistry series no. 105, Anaerobic Biological Treatment Processes. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, p 126Andrews JF, Pearson EA (1965) Kinetics and characteristics of volatile acid production in anaerobic fermentation processes. Air Water Pollut 9:439–461Angelidaki I, Sanders W (2004) Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropllutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:117–129Antila J, Tuohiniemi M, Rissanen A, KantojĂ€rvi U, Lahti M, Viherkanto K, Kaarre M, Malinen J (2014) MEMS- and MOEMS-based near-infrared spectrometers. Encycl Anal Chem 1–36. doi: 10.1002/9780470027318.a9376Antoniades CD, Christofides P (2001) Integrating nonlinear output feedback control and optimal actuator/sensor placement for transport-reaction processes. Chem Eng Sci 56:4517–4535APHA (2005) American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environmental Federation, Standard methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn. Washington, DC, USAAppels L, Baeyens J, DegrĂšve J, Dewil R (2008) Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energ Combust 34:755–781Appels L, Lauwers J, Gins G, Degreve J, Van Impe J, Dewil R (2011) Parameter identification and modeling of the biochemical methane potential of waste activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 45:4173–4178Aquino SF, Chernicharo CAL, Soares H, Takemoto SY, Vazoller RF (2008) Methodologies for determining the bioavailability and biodegradability of sludges. Environ Technol 29:855–862Astals S, Esteban-GutiĂ©rrez M, FernĂĄndez-ArĂ©valo T, Aymerich E, GarcĂ­a-Heras JL, Mata-Alvarez J (2013a) Anaerobic digestion of seven different sewage sludges: a biodegradability and modelling study. Water Res 47:6033–6043Astals S, Nolla-ArdĂšvol V, Mata-Alvarez J (2013b) Thermophilic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol: process performance and digestate stability. J Biotechnol 166:97–104Babary JP, Julien S, NihtilĂ€ MT et al (1999) New boundary conditions and adaptive control of fixed-bed bioreactors. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 38:35–44Barat R, Serralta J, Ruano MV, JimĂ©nez E, Ribes J, Seco A, Ferrer J (2012) Biological nutrient removal model No 2 (BNRM2): a general model for wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 67:1481–1489Bastin G, Dochain D (1990) On-line estimation and adaptive control of bioreactors. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamBatstone DJ (2013) Modelling and control in anaerobic digestion: achievements and challenges. 13th IWA World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion (AD 13), pp 1–6Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I et al (2002) Anaerobic digestion model No. 1. (ADM1). IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 13. IWABatstone DJ, Tait S, Starrenburg D (2009) Estimation of hydrolysis parameters in full-scale anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1513–1520Batstone DJ, Amerlinck Y, Ekama G et al (2012) Towards a generalized physicochemical framework. Water Sci Technol 66:1147–1161Baumann WT, Rugh WJ (1986) Feedback control of nonlinear systems by extended linearization. IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC-31:40–46Benyahia B, Campillo F, Cherki B, Harmand J (2012) Particle filtring for the chemostat. In: MED’12, Barcelone, SpainBernard O (2011) Hurdles and challenges for modelling and control of microalgae for CO2 mitigation and biofuel production. J Process Control 21:1378–1389Bernard O, GouzĂ© JL (2004) Closed loop observers bundle for uncertain biotechnological models. J Process Control 14:765–774Bernard O, Hadj-Sadok Z, Dochain D et al (2001a) Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol Bioeng 75:424–438Bernard O, Polit M, Hadj-Sadok Z, Pengov M, Dochain D, Estaben M, Labat P (2001b) Advanced monitoring and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants: software sensors and controllers for an anaerobic digester. Water Sci Technol 43:175–182Bernard O, Chachuat B, HĂ©lias A, Rodriguez J (2005a) Can we assess the model complexity for a bioprocess? Theory and example of the anaerobic digestion process. Water Sci Technol 53:85–92Bernard O, Chachuat B, HĂ©lias A, Le Dantec B, Sialve B, Steyer JP, Lavigne JF (2005b) An integrated system to remote monitor and control anaerobic wastewater treatment plants through the internet. Water Sci Technol 52:457–464Björnsson L, Hörnsten EG, Mattiasson B (2001a) Utilization of a palladium–metal oxide semiconductor (Pd-MOS) sensor for on-line monitoring of dissolved hydrogen in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng 73:35–43Björnsson L, Murto M, Jantsch TG, Mattiasson B (2001b) Evaluation of new methods for the monitoring of alkalinity, dissolved hydrogen and the microbial community in anaerobic digestion. Water Res 35:2833–2840Boe K (2006) Online monitoring and control of the biogas process. Technical University of DenmarkBoe K, Batstone D, Angelidaki I (2007) An innovative online VFA monitoring system for the anerobic process, based on headspace gas chromatography. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:712–721Boe K, Steyer JP, Angelidaki I (2008) Monitoring and control of the biogas process based on propionate concentration using online VFA measurement. Water Sci Technol 57:661–766Boe K, Batstone DJ, Steyer JP, Angelidaki I (2010) State indicators for monitoring the anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 44:5973–5980Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254Brinkmann K, Blaschke L, Polle A (2002) Comparison of different methods for lignin determination as a basis for calibration of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and implications of lignoproteins. J Chem Ecol 28:2483–2501BuendĂ­a IM, FernĂĄndez FJ, Villaseñor J, RodrĂ­guez L (2008) Biodegradability of meat industry wastes under anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Water Res 42:3767–3774Buffiere P, Loisel D, Bernet N, Delgenes JP (2006) Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Sci Technol 53:233–241Cao Y, Pawlowski A (2012) Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: brief overview and energy efficiency assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:1657–1665Carballa M, Regueiro L, Lema JM (2015) Microbial management of anaerobic digestion: exploiting the microbiome-functionality nexus. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33:103–111Carlos-Hernandez S, Beteau JF, Sanchez EN (2007) Intelligent control strategy for an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. In: Michel P (ed) Computer applications in biotechnology, vol 1. Cancun, Mexico, pp 73–78Carlos-Hernandez S, Sanchez EN, Bueno JA (2010) Neurofuzzy control strategy for an abattoir wastewater treatment process. In: Banga JR, Bogaerts P, Van Impe J, Dochain D, Smets I (eds) 11th International symposium on computer applications in biotechnology. Leuven, Belgium, pp 84–89Chandler JA, Jewell WJ, Gossett JM (1980) Predicting methane fermentation biodegradability. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 10:93–107Chen YH (1990) Adaptive robust observers for non-linear uncertain systems. Int J Syst Sci 21:803–814Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064Chynoweth DP, Turick CE, Owens JM, Jerger DE, Peck MW (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenerg 5:95–111Cirne DG, van der Zee FP, Fernandez-Polanco M, Fernandez-Polanco F (2008) Control of sulphide during anaerobic treatment of S-containing wastewaters by adding limited amounts of oxygen or nitrate. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:93–105ColombiĂ© S, Latrille E, Sablayrolles JM (2007) Online estimation of assimilable nitrogen by electrical conductivity measurement during alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions. J Biosci Bioeng 103:229–235Cord-Ruwisch R, Mercz TI, Hoh CY, Strong GE (1997) Dissolved hydrogen concentration as an on-line control parameter for the automated operation and optimization of anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:626–634Cossu R, Raga R (2008) Test methods for assessing the biological stability of biodegradable waste. Waste Manage 28:381–388Cresson R, Pommier S, BĂ©line F et al (2014) Etude interlaboratoires pour l’harmonisation des protocoles de mesure du potentiel bio-mĂ©thanogĂšne des matrices solides hĂ©tĂ©rogĂšnes—Final report (in French) ADEMEDalmau J, Comas J, RodrĂ­guez-Roda I, Pagilla K, Steyer JP (2010) Model development and simulation for predicting risk of foaming in anaerobic digestion systems. Bioresour Technol 101:4306–4314Davidsson A, Gruvberger C, Christensen TH, Hansen TL, Jansen J (2007) Methane yield in source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 27:406–414De Baere L (2000) Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art. Water Sci Technol 41:283–290De Baere L (2008) Partial stream digestion of residual municipal solid waste. Water Sci Technol 57:1073–1077De Gracia M, Grau P, Huete E et al (2009) New generic mathematical model for WWTP sludge digesters operating under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: model building and experimental verification. Water Res 43:4626–4642De Vrieze J, Verstraete W, Boon N (2013) Repeated pulse feeding induces functional stability in anaerobic digestion. Microb Biotechnol 6:414–424Delattre C, Dochain D, Winkin J (2004) Observability analysis of nonlinear tubular (bio)reactor models: a case study. J Process Control 14:661–669Di Pinto AC, Limoni N, Passino R, Rozzi A, Tomei MC (1990) Instrumentation, control and automation of water and wastewater treatment and transport systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th IAWPRC workshop, pp 51–58DĂ­az I, PĂ©rez C, Alfaro N, Fdz-Polanco F (2015) A feasibility study on the bioconversion of CO2 and H2 to biomethane by gas sparging through polymeric membranes. Bioresour Technol 185:246–253Dochain D (2003) State and parameter estimation in chemical and biochemical processes: a tutorial. J Process Control 13:801–818Dochain D, Tali-Maamar N, Babary JP (1997) On modelling, monitoring and control of fixed bed bioreactors. Comput Chem Eng 21:1255–1266Dochain D, Perrier M, Guay M (2011) Extremum seeking control and its application to process and reaction systems: a survey. Math Comput Simulat 82:369–380Donoso-Bravo A, Garcia G, PĂ©rez-Elvira S, Fernandez-Polanco F (2011) Initial rates technique as a procedure to predict the anaerobic digester operation. Biochem Eng J 53(3):275–280Doublet J, Boulanger A, Ponthieux A, Laroche C, Poitrenaud M, Cacho Rivero JA (2013) Predicting the biochemical methane potential of wide range of organic substrates by near infrared spectroscopy. Bioresour Technol 128:252–258Dreywood R (1946) Qualitative test for carbohydrate material. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition. Am Chem Soc 18:499Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356Ekama GA, Sotemann SW, Wentzel MC (2007) Biodegradability of activated sludge organics under anaerobic conditions. Water Res 41:244–252Ellison WJ, Pedarros-Caubet F, Caubet R (2007) Automatic and rapid measurement of microbial suspension growth parameters: application to the evaluation of effector agents. J Rapid Meth Aut Mic 15:369–410Fang HHP (2012) Bioenergy production from waste and wastewater in China. In: Technical proceedings of the 2012 NSTI nanotechnology conference and expo, NSTI-nanotech 2012, pp 381–383Fannin KF, Chynoweth DP, Isaacson R (1987) Start-up, operation, stability, and control. Anaerob Dig Biomass 171–196Fdz-Polanco M, DĂ­az I, PĂ©rez SI, Lopes AC, Fdz-Polanco F (2009a) Hydrogen sulphide removal in the anaerobic digestion of sludge by micro-aerobic processes: pilot plant experience. Water Sci Technol 60:3045–3050Fdz-Polanco M, PĂ©rez-Elvira SI, DĂ­az I, GarcĂ­a L, TorĂ­o R, Acevedo AF (2009b) EliminaciĂłn de H2S en digestiĂłn anaerobia de lodos por procesos microaerofĂ­licos: experiencia en planta piloto. Tecnol del Agua 29:58–64Feitkenhauer H, von Sachs J, Meyer U (2002) On-line titration of volatile fatty acids for the process control of anaerobic digestion plants. Water Res 36:212–218FernĂĄndez YB, Soares A, Villa R, Vale P, Cartmell E (2014) Carbon capture and biogas enhancement by carbon dioxide enrichment of anaerobic digesters treating sewage sludge or food waste. Bioresour Technol 159:1–7Fountoulakis MS, Stamatelatou K, Lyberatos G (2008) The effect of pharmaceuticals on the kinetics of methanogenesis and acetogenesis. Bioresour Technol 99:7083–7090Francioso O, Rodriguez-Estrada MT, Montecchio D, Salomoni C, Caputo A, Palenzona D (2010) Chemical characterization of municipal wastewater sludges produced by two-phase anaerobic digestion for biogas production. J Hazard Mater 175:740–746Frigon JC, Roy C, Guiot SR (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with mulched switchgrass for improvement of the methane yield. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:341–349Frings CS, Dunn RT (1970) A colorimetric method for determination of total serum lipids based on the sulfo-phospho-vanillin reaction. Am J Clin Pathol 53:89–91FrĂžlund B, Palmgren R, Keiding K, Nielsen PH (1996) Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res 30:1749–1758Gaida D, Wolf C, Meyer C, Stuhlsatz A, Lippel J, BĂ€ck T, Bongards M, McLoone S (2012) State estimation for anaerobic digesters using the ADM1. Water Sci Technol 66:1088–1095Ganesh R, Torrijos M, Sousbie P et al (2013) Anaerobic co-digestion of solid waste: effect of increasing organic loading rates and characterization of the solubilised organic matter. Bioresource Technol 130:559–569GarcĂ­a-DiĂ©guez C, Molina F, Roca E (2011) Multi-objective cascade controller for an anaerobic digester. Process Biochem 46:900–909GarcĂ­a-Gen (2015) Modelling, optimisation and control of anaerobic co-digestion processes (2015), Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­micaGarcĂ­a-Gen S, Sousbie P, Rangaraj G et al (2015) Kinetic modelling of anaerobic hydrolysis of solid wastes, including disintegration processes. Waste Manag 35:96–104Gauthier JP, Kupka IAK (1994) Observability and observers for nonlinear systems. SIAM J Control Optim 32:975–994Gauthier JP, Hammouri H, Othman S (1992) A simple observer for nonlinear systems applications to bioreactors. Autom Control IEEE Trans 37:875–880Ge H, Jensen PD, Batstone DJ (2011) Increased temperature in the thermophilic stage in temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) improves degradability of waste activated sludge. J Hazard Mater 187:355–361Gendron S, Perrier M, Barrett J, Legault N (1993) Adaptive control of brightness: the model weighting approach. Annual meeting—technical section, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Preprints. Publ by Canadian Pulp & Paper AssocGhosh S, Conrad JR, Klass DL (1975) Anaerobic acidogenesis of waste activated sludge, WPCF 47Goffaux G, Van de Wouwer A (2005) Bioprocess state estimation: some classical and less classical approaches. Springer, BerlinGornall AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J Biochem Chem 177:751–766GouzĂ© JL, Rapaport A, Hadj-Sadok MZ (2000) Interval observers for uncertain biological systems. Ecol Model 133:45–56Grau P, de Gracia M, Vanrolleghem PA, Ayesa E (2007) A new plant-wide modelling methodology for WWTPs. Water Res 41:4357–4372Gregersen KH (2003) Økonomien i biogasfĂŠllesanlĂŠg, Udvikling og status medio (2002) Report no. 150. Institute of Food and Resource Economic, Rolighedsvej 25, DK 1958, Frederiksberg C, DenmarkGrepmeier M (2002) Experimentelle Untersuchungen an einer zweistufigen fuzzy-geregelten anaeroben Abwasserreinigungsanlage mit neuartigem Festbettmaterial. TU MunichGuay M, Dochain D, Perrier M (2004) Adaptive extremum seeking control of continuous stirred tank bioreactors with unknown growth kinetics. Automatica 40:881–888Gunaseelan VN (2007) Regression models of ultimate methane yields of fruits and vegetable solid wastes, sorghum and napiergrass on chemical composition. Bioresour Technol 98:1270–1277Gunaseelan VN (2009) Predicting ultimate methane yields of Jatropha curcus and Morus indica from their chemical composition. Bioresour Technol 100:3426–3429Guwy AJ, Hawkes FR, Wilcox SJ, Hawkes DL (1997) Neural network and on-off control of bicarbonate alkalinity in a fluidised-bed anaerobic digester. Water Res 31:2019–2025Guwy AJ, Dinsdale RM, Kim JR et al (2011) Fermentative biohydrogen production systems integration. Bioresour Technol 102:8534–8542Hao OJ (2003) Sulphate-reducing bacteria. In: Mara D, Horan N (eds) Handbook of water and wastewater microbiology. Academic Press Inc, London, pp 459–468HarremoĂ«s P, Capodaglio AG, H

    Implementation of a specific rate controller in a fed-batch E. coli fermentation

    Get PDF
    The specific growth rate is one of the most important process variables characterizing the state of microorganisms during fermentations mainly because the biosynthesis of many products of interest is often related with the values assumed by this parameter. In the particular case of the fed-batch operation of Escherichia coli for the production of recombinant proteins, it is important to maintain the specific growth rate below a certain threshold in order to avoid the accumulation of acetic acid throughout the fermentation and, additionally, it is often argued that both pre- and the post-induction specific growth rates should be closely controlled in order to achieve maximum productivities of the desired recombinant protein. In a previous work the authors have developed and validated by simulations a strategy for the automatic control of the specific growth rate in E. coli fed-batch fermentations based on an asymptotic observer for biomass and on developed estimators for the specific growth rates. The main purpose of the present work was to implement experimentally the developed observer, estimator and controller in a real fed-batch fermentation process. For that purpose a data acquisition and control program was developed in LabVIEW that allows the acquisition of the necessary on line data (off gas and dissolved oxygen concentration and culture weight) and the calculation of the feeding rates using the developed equations. The feedforward-feedback controller developed was able to keep the culture growing in an exponential phase throughout the fermentation without accumulation of glucose and acetate.Fundação para a CiĂȘncia e a Tecnologia (FCT) - RecSysBio projecto POCI/BIO/60139/200

    Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of actual industrial wastewaters : reactor stability and kinetic modeling.

    Get PDF
    Industrial plants pay disposal costs for discharging their wastewater that can contain pollutants, toxic organics and inorganics, to the sewer based on the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) or Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of the streams. It has become increasingly expensive for industry to meet stringent regulatory standards. One solution to reduce this cost is to anaerobically degrade the COD content, which in turn generates useful methane gas that can be used to generate useful energy or heat. Anaerobic Digestion (AD) is one of the most suitable renewable resources of conversion of industrial wastewaters to bioenergy, but it is not widely utilized in the US. As a result, this research focused on understanding and improving fundamental technical and economic obstacles such as long residence times, large reactor sizes/footprints and product quality that hamper its industrial applications in the US. Kinetic modeling of these anaerobic digestion processes is important for evaluating experimental results, predicting performance, and optimizing reactor designs, but the modeling can be especially difficult for complex wastewater compositions. Respirometry tests were first conducted to assess the impact of substrate loading on kinetic parameters during AD of three industrial/agricultural wastewaters: soybean processing WW, brewery WW, and recycled beverage WW. Results showed that the rate order statistically increased with increasing initial COD content, demonstrating that conventional kinetic modeling is inadequate for these WW of complex composition. COD degradation models revealed the Monod model gave the best overall fit to experimental data throughout the duration of the AD process, but the reactions were best fit to first-order kinetics during the first 7-9 hours and then best fit to higher order kinetics after about 8-13 hours depending on initial COD load. Expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors are two-stage continuous systems developed to reduce the residence time and footprint by expanding the sludge bed and escalating hydraulic mixing. However, higher molecular weight and slowly degrading organics, such as crude proteins and fats, cannot efficiently diffuse into the granular biomass to be digested before exiting the reactor, which limits AD efficiency. COD removal efficiency increased by up to 42% and biogas production rate by up to 32% for equivalent organic loading rates by properly manipulating COD load and feed rate. Hydrogen gas, an intermediate product generated during stage-one pre-acidification (PA), escapes the PA tank but theoretically can be captured and sent to the second stage EGSB reactor to enhance the biogas quality by biologically converting the carbon dioxide to methane. Introducing supplemental hydrogen gas in amounts less than theoretically generated in the PA tank increased energy yield by up to 42% and enhanced biogas quality by up to 20%. In addition, COD removal efficiency remained constant at ~98%, indicating that hydrogen injection did not negatively affect overall substrate removal

    Nonlinear model of leachate anaerobic digestion treatment process

    Get PDF
    In this report a continuous adaptive high−gain observer method is presented for the estimation of state variables that could not be measurable online and unknown time−varying parameters of leachate anaerobic digestion treatment process. The high−gain observer is a variant of the Luenberger extended observer and involves an adjustable gain parameter. It is characterized by easy implementation and calibration, is stable and exhibit exponential convergence. The observer is based on a simplified mathematical model of the system. Calibration of the model was performed with real data from the Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor for landfill leachate treatment in open loop under normal operational conditions. The model performance is evaluated via numerical simulations showing adequate results. The criteria used for considering the model as acceptable is to calculate the values of Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and Prediction at level l.Peer reviewe

    Modelling concentration gradients in fed‐batch cultivations of E. coli – towards the flexible design of scale‐down experiments

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The impact of concentration gradients in large industrial-scale bioreactors on microbial physiology can be studied in scale-down bioreactors. However, scale-down systems pose several challenges in construction, operation and footprint. Therefore, it is challenging to implement them in emerging technologies for bioprocess development, such as in high throughput cultivation platforms. In this study, a mechanistic model of a two-compartment scale-down bioreactor is developed. Simulations from this model are then used as bases for a pulse-based scale-down bioreactor suitable for application in parallel cultivation systems. RESULTS: As an application, the pulse-based system model was used to study the misincorporation of non-canonical branched-chain amino acids into recombinant pre-proinsulin expressed in Escherichia coli, as a response to oscillations in glucose and dissolved oxygen concentrations. The results show significant accumulation of overflow metabolites, up to 18.3 % loss in product yield and up to 10 fold accumulation of the non-canonical amino acids norvaline and norleucine in the product in the pulse-based cultivation, compared to a reference cultivation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the combination of a pulse-based scale-down approach with mechanistic models is a very suitable method to test strain robustness and physiological constraints at the early stages of bioprocess development.EC/H2020/643056/EU/Rapid Bioprocess Development/Biorapi
    • 

    corecore