Applications of negotiation theory to water issues

The authors review the applications of noncooperative bargaining theory to waterrelated issues-which fall in the category of formal models of negotiation. They aim to identify the conditions under which agreements are likely to emerge and their characteristics, to support policymakers in devising the"rules of the game"that could help obtain a desired result. Despite the fact that allocation of natural resources, especially trans-boundary allocation, has all the characteristics of a negotiation problem, there are not many applications of formal negotiation theory to the issue. Therefore, the authors first discuss the noncooperative bargaining models applied to water allocation problems found in the literature. Key findings include the important role noncooperative negotiations can play in cases where binding agreements cannot be signed; the value added of politically and socially acceptable compromises; and the need for a negotiated model that considers incomplete information over the negotiated resource.Water Supply and Sanitation Governance and Institutions,Town Water Supply and Sanitation,Water and Industry,Environmental Economics&Policies,Water Conservation

System and Decision Sciences at IIASA 1973-1980

This report contains a brief history of the past achievements of the System and Decision Sciences Area at IIASA, and a summary of its current and future research directions. There is a comprehensive list of the scientific staff of the Area since 1973, together with a list of their publications; abstracts of the most recent reports and biographies of the scholars working in the Area in 1980 are also included

Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater

The world's fresh water resources are unequally distributed both in time and in space.Until recently water resources management focused on reallocating water to when and where it was required,a sully-side of fragmented approach. Nowadays there are signs that water resource availability is dwindling -due to both population growth and increased per capita water use- and eco-systems are being damaged. To face this challenge a new holistic approach is needed. This approach includes the integrated or conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources and takes account of social ,economic and environmental factors. Moreover ,it recognizes the importance of water quality issues. In this context ,the paper examines the main aspects and problems concerned with the planning,design ,construction and management of conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water resources,along with its environmental impacts and constraints to sustainable development.The importance and role of research thrust,technology transfer,institutional strengthening ,effective partnerships between governments and stakeholders ,and sound financial frameworks are also examined. Finally ,the challenges anf benchmarks for future actions that the scientific community and planners have to face and deal with ,are briefly outlined

From scaling to governance of the land system: bridging ecological and economic perspectives

One of the main unresolved problems in policy making is the step from scale issues to effective governance. What is appropriate for a lower level, such as a region or location, might be considered undesirable at a global scale. Linking scaling to governance is an important issue for the improvement of current environmental management and policies. Whereas social–ecological science tends to focus on adaptive behavior and aspects of spatial ecological data, new institutional economics focuses more on levels in institutional scales and temporal dimensions. Consequently, both disciplines perceive different scaling challenges while aiming at a similar improvement of effective governance. We propose that future research needs to focus on four themes: (1) How to combine spatial properties such as extent and grain with the economic units of market and agent; (2) How to combine the different governance instruments proposed by both perspectives; (3) How to communicate the different scaling perspectives (hierarchy vs. no hierarchy) and meanings to policy makers and other stakeholders; and (4) How to deal with the non-equilibrium conditions in the real world and the disciplinary perspectives. Here, we hypothesize that a combined system perspective of both disciplines will improve our understanding of the missing link between scaling and governanc