402 research outputs found

    Rapid identification of oil contaminated soils using visible near infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

    Get PDF
    Initially, 46 petroleum contaminated and non-contaminated soil samples were collected and scanned using visible near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (VisNIR DRS) at three combinations of moisture content and pretreatment. The VisNIR spectra of soil samples were used to predict total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) content using partial least squares (PLS) regression and boosted regression tree (BRT) models. The field-moist intact scan proved best for predicting TPH content with a validation r2 of 0.64 and relative percent difference (RPD) of 1.70. Those 46 samples were used to calibrate a penalized spline (PS) model. Subsequently, the PS model was used to predict soil TPH content for 128 soil samples collected over an 80 ha study site. An exponential semivariogram using PS predictions revealed strong spatial dependence among soil TPH [r2 = 0.76, range = 52 m, nugget = 0.001 (log10 mg kg-1)2, and sill 1.044 (log10 mg kg-1)2]. An ordinary block kriging map produced from the data showed that TPH distribution matched the expected TPH variability of the study site. Another study used DRS to measure reflectance patterns of 68 artificially constructed samples with different clay content, organic carbon levels, petroleum types, and different levels of contamination per type. Both first derivative of reflectance and discrete wavelet transformations were used to preprocess the spectra. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied for qualitative VisNIR discrimination of variable soil types, organic carbon levels, petroleum types, and concentration levels. Soil types were separated with 100% accuracy, and organic carbon levels were separated with 96% accuracy by linear discriminant analysis. The support vector machine produced 82% classification accuracy for organic carbon levels by repeated random splitting of the whole dataset. However, spectral absorptions for each petroleum hydrocarbon overlapped with each other and could not be separated with any classification scheme when contaminations were mixed. Wavelet-based multiple linear regression performed best for predicting petroleum amount with the highest residual prediction deviation (RPD) of 3.97. While using the first derivative of reflectance spectra, PS regression performed better (RPD = 3.3) than the PLS (RPD= 2.5) model. Specific calibrations considering additional soil physicochemical variability are recommended to produce improved predictions

    Using satellite hyperspectral imagery to map soil organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus

    Get PDF
    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)Up-to-date and accurate information on soil properties is important for precision farming and environmental management. The spatial information of soil properties allows adjustments of fertilizer applications to be made based on knowledge of local field conditions, thereby maximizing agricultural productivity and minimizing the risk of environmental pollution. While conventional soil sampling procedures are labor-intensive, time-consuming and expensive, remote sensing techniques provide a rapid and efficient tool for mapping soil properties. This study aimed at examining the capacity of hyperspectral reflectance data for mapping soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P). Soil samples collected from Eagle Creek Watershed, Cicero Creek Watershed, and Fall Creek Watershed were analyzed for organic matter content, total N and total P; their corresponding spectral reflectance was measured in the laboratory before and after oven drying and in the field using Analytical Spectral Devices spectrometer. Hyperion images for each of the watersheds were acquired, calibrated and corrected and Hyperion image spectra for individual sampled sites were extracted. These hyperspectral reflectance data were related to SOM, total N and total P concentration through partial least squares (PLS) regressions. The samples were split into two datasets: one for calibration, and the other for validation. High PLS performance was observed during the calibration for SOM and total N regardless of the type of the reflectance spectra, and for total P with Hyperion image spectra. The validation of PLS models was carried out with each type of reflectance to assess their predictive power. For laboratory reflectance spectra, PLS models of SOM and total N resulted in higher R2 values and lower RMSEP with oven-dried than those with field-moist soils. The results demonstrate that soil moisture degrades the performance of PLS in estimating soil constituents with spectral reflectance. For in-situ field spectra, PLS estimated SOM with an R2 of 0.74, N with an R2 of 0.79, and P with an R2 of 0.60. For Hyperion image spectra, PLS predictive models yielded an R2 of 0.74 between measured and predicted SOM, an R2 of 0.72 between measured and predicted total N, and an R2 of 0.67 between measured and predicted total P. These results reveal slightly decreased model performance when shifting from laboratory-measured spectra to satellite image spectra. Regardless of the spectral data, the models for estimating SOM and total N consistently outperformed those for estimating total P. These results also indicate that PLS is an effective tool for remotely estimating SOM, total N and P in agricultural soils, but more research is needed to improve the predictive power of the model when applied to satellite hyperspectral imagery

    Improving soil organic carbon predictions from a Sentinel–2 soil composite by assessing surface conditions and uncertainties

    Get PDF
    Soil organic carbon (SOC) prediction from remote sensing is often hindered by disturbing factors at the soil surface, such as photosynthetic active and non–photosynthetic active vegetation, variation in soil moisture or surface roughness. With the increasing amount of freely available satellite data, recent studies have focused on stabilizing the soil reflectance by building reflectance composites using time series of images. Although composite imagery has demonstrated its potential in SOC prediction, it is still not well established if the resulting composite spectra mirror the reflectance fingerprint of the optimal conditions to predict topsoil properties (i.e. a smooth, dry and bare soil). We have collected 303 photos of soil surfaces in the Belgian loam belt where five main classes of surface conditions were distinguished: smooth seeded soils, soil crusts, partial cover by a growing crop, moist soils and crop residue cover. Reflectance spectra were then extracted from the Sentinel–2 images coinciding with the date of the photos. After the growing crop was removed by an NDVI < 0.25, the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR2) was calculated to characterize the soil surface, and a threshold of NBR2 < 0.05 was found to be able to separate dry bare soils from soils in unfavorable conditions i.e. wet soils and soils covered by crop residues. Additionally, we found that normalizing the spectra (i.e. dividing the reflectance of each band by the mean reflectance of all spectral bands) allows for cancelling the albedo shift between soil crusts and smooth soils in seed–bed conditions. We then built the exposed soil composite from Sentinel–2 imagery for southern Belgium and part of Noord-Holland and Flevoland in the Netherlands (covering the spring periods of 2016–2021). We used the mean spectra per pixel to predict SOC content by means of a Partial Least Squares Regression Model (PLSR) with 10–fold cross–validation. The uncertainty of the models was assessed via the prediction interval ratio (PIR). The cross validation of the model gave satisfactory results (mean of 100 bootstraps: model efficiency coefficient (MEC) = 0.48 ± 0.07, RMSE = 3.5 ± 0.3 g C kg–1, RPD = 1.4 ± 0.1 and RPIQ = 1.9 ± 0.3). The resulting SOC prediction maps show that the uncertainty of prediction decreases when the number of scenes per pixel increases, and reaches a minimum when at least six scenes per pixel are used (mean PIR of all pixels is 12.4 g C kg–1, while mean SOC predicted is 14.1 g C kg–1). The results of a validation against an independent data set showed a median difference of 0.5 g C kg–1 ± 2.8 g C kg–1 SOC between the measured (average SOC content 13.5 g C kg–1) and predicted SOC contents at field scale. Overall, this compositing method shows both realistic within field and regional SOC patterns

    Soil Moisture Measuring Techniques and Factors Affecting the Moisture Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review

    Get PDF
    The amount of surface soil moisture (SSM) is a crucial ecohydrological natural resource that regulates important land surface processes. It affects critical land–atmospheric phenomena, including the division of energy and water (infiltration, runoff, and evaporation), that impacts the effectiveness of agricultural output (sensible and latent heat fluxes and surface air temperature). Despite its significance, there are several difficulties in making precise measurements, monitoring, and interpreting SSM at high spatial and temporal resolutions. The current study critically reviews the methods and procedures for calculating SSM and the variables influencing measurement accuracy and applicability under different fields, climates, and operational conditions. For laboratory and field measurements, this study divides SSM estimate strategies into (i) direct and (ii) indirect procedures. The accuracy and applicability of a technique depends on the environment and the resources at hand. Comparative research is geographically restricted, although precise and economical—direct measuring techniques like the gravimetric method are time-consuming and destructive. In contrast, indirect methods are more expensive and do not produce measurements at the spatial scale but produce precise data on a temporal scale. While measuring SSM across more significant regions, ground-penetrating radar and remote sensing methods are susceptible to errors caused by overlapping data and atmospheric factors. On the other hand, soft computing techniques like machine/deep learning are quite handy for estimating SSM without any technical or laborious procedures. We determine that factors, e.g., topography, soil type, vegetation, climate change, groundwater level, depth of soil, etc., primarily influence the SSM measurements. Different techniques have been put into practice for various practical situations, although comparisons between them are not available frequently in publications. Each method offers a unique set of potential advantages and disadvantages. The most accurate way of identifying the best soil moisture technique is the value selection method (VSM). The neutron probe is preferable to the FDR or TDR sensor for measuring soil moisture. Remote sensing techniques have filled the need for large-scale, highly spatiotemporal soil moisture monitoring. Through self-learning capabilities in data-scarce areas, machine/deep learning approaches facilitate soil moisture measurement and prediction

    Assessing the role of EO in biodiversity monitoring: options for integrating in-situ observations with EO within the context of the EBONE concept

    Get PDF
    The European Biodiversity Observation Network (EBONE) is a European contribution on terrestrial monitoring to GEO BON, the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network. EBONE’s aims are to develop a system of biodiversity observation at regional, national and European levels by assessing existing approaches in terms of their validity and applicability starting in Europe, then expanding to regions in Africa. The objective of EBONE is to deliver: 1. A sound scientific basis for the production of statistical estimates of stock and change of key indicators; 2. The development of a system for estimating past changes and forecasting and testing policy options and management strategies for threatened ecosystems and species; 3. A proposal for a cost-effective biodiversity monitoring system. There is a consensus that Earth Observation (EO) has a role to play in monitoring biodiversity. With its capacity to observe detailed spatial patterns and variability across large areas at regular intervals, our instinct suggests that EO could deliver the type of spatial and temporal coverage that is beyond reach with in-situ efforts. Furthermore, when considering the emerging networks of in-situ observations, the prospect of enhancing the quality of the information whilst reducing cost through integration is compelling. This report gives a realistic assessment of the role of EO in biodiversity monitoring and the options for integrating in-situ observations with EO within the context of the EBONE concept (cfr. EBONE-ID1.4). The assessment is mainly based on a set of targeted pilot studies. Building on this assessment, the report then presents a series of recommendations on the best options for using EO in an effective, consistent and sustainable biodiversity monitoring scheme. The issues that we faced were many: 1. Integration can be interpreted in different ways. One possible interpretation is: the combined use of independent data sets to deliver a different but improved data set; another is: the use of one data set to complement another dataset. 2. The targeted improvement will vary with stakeholder group: some will seek for more efficiency, others for more reliable estimates (accuracy and/or precision); others for more detail in space and/or time or more of everything. 3. Integration requires a link between the datasets (EO and in-situ). The strength of the link between reflected electromagnetic radiation and the habitats and their biodiversity observed in-situ is function of many variables, for example: the spatial scale of the observations; timing of the observations; the adopted nomenclature for classification; the complexity of the landscape in terms of composition, spatial structure and the physical environment; the habitat and land cover types under consideration. 4. The type of the EO data available varies (function of e.g. budget, size and location of region, cloudiness, national and/or international investment in airborne campaigns or space technology) which determines its capability to deliver the required output. EO and in-situ could be combined in different ways, depending on the type of integration we wanted to achieve and the targeted improvement. We aimed for an improvement in accuracy (i.e. the reduction in error of our indicator estimate calculated for an environmental zone). Furthermore, EO would also provide the spatial patterns for correlated in-situ data. EBONE in its initial development, focused on three main indicators covering: (i) the extent and change of habitats of European interest in the context of a general habitat assessment; (ii) abundance and distribution of selected species (birds, butterflies and plants); and (iii) fragmentation of natural and semi-natural areas. For habitat extent, we decided that it did not matter how in-situ was integrated with EO as long as we could demonstrate that acceptable accuracies could be achieved and the precision could consistently be improved. The nomenclature used to map habitats in-situ was the General Habitat Classification. We considered the following options where the EO and in-situ play different roles: using in-situ samples to re-calibrate a habitat map independently derived from EO; improving the accuracy of in-situ sampled habitat statistics, by post-stratification with correlated EO data; and using in-situ samples to train the classification of EO data into habitat types where the EO data delivers full coverage or a larger number of samples. For some of the above cases we also considered the impact that the sampling strategy employed to deliver the samples would have on the accuracy and precision achieved. Restricted access to European wide species data prevented work on the indicator ‘abundance and distribution of species’. With respect to the indicator ‘fragmentation’, we investigated ways of delivering EO derived measures of habitat patterns that are meaningful to sampled in-situ observations

    Improving field management by machine vision - a review

    Get PDF
    Growing population of people around the world and thus increasing demand to food products as well as high tendency for declining the cost of operations and environmental preserving cares intensify inclination toward the application of variable rate systems for agricultural treatments, in which machine vision as a powerful appliance has been paid vast attention by agricultural researchers and farmers as this technology consumers. Various applications have introduced for machine vision in different fields of agricultural and food industry till now that confirms the high potential of this approach for inspection of different parameters affecting productivity. Computer vision has been utilized for quantification of factors affecting crop growth in field; such as, weed, irrigation, soil quality, plant nutrients and fertilizers in several cases. This paper presents some of these successful applications in addition to representing an introduction to machine vision

    An evaluation of Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis applied to Landsat 8 OLI images for mapping land cover in southern Africa\u27s Savanna.

    Get PDF
    Mapping land cover in southern Africa’s savannas using traditional pixel based remote sensing techniques can be very challenging due to the heterogeneity of its vegetation structure and the spectral difficulty in separating similar land covers across various land uses. In order to overcome these complications, a Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) provides a potential remote sensing approach to quantify spectral variation in the physical environment at a subpixel level. The MESMA approach was applied in the study area of the Mayuni Conservancy, in Namibia. Results show that 32.3% of the study area is covered by photosynthetic vegetation (PV), 32.0% by non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV), 25.2% by bare soil (B) and 10.6% by shade. Post-classification validation shows that MESMA presented a moderate performance in estimating the proportions of land cover types in the study area. However the validation process is limited to the available resources and carries great subjectivity. It is concluded that future research on the matter should include a more consistent investigation on the endmember selection methodology and expand the study area inside of the same ecosystem

    Heterogeneity of soil properties at the field-scale and spatial patterns of soil-borne pests and weeds

    Get PDF
    Soil heterogeneity at the field-scale not only affects crop growth and yield, but also spatial patterns of soil-borne pests and weeds. Therefore, site-specific management in due consideration of soil variability is required within the scope of precision crop protection. The focus of this study was the use of minimal- and non-invasive sensor technologies at the field-scale to improve (i) the assessment of soil organic carbon (SOC), (ii) management strategies for the beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii and (iii) the appreciation for complex interrelations of soil properties and weeds. A detailed knowledge on high-resolution SOC heterogeneity in agricultural soils is required, because SOC affects other soil properties such as aggregate stability or soil respiration. The small-scale spatial variability of SOC was determined using imaging spectroscopy in the visible and near-infrared region on long-term uniformly cultivated test fields with varying soil surface conditions (roughness, vegetation). Soil reflectance was recorded by the aircraft-mounted hyperspectral sensor HyMap (450 – 2500 nm). Site-specific characteristics affected the calibration models; highest prediction accuracy was performed over a bare, fine soil (R2 = 0.80). A generated pixel-wise map (8 × 8 m) on the basis of hyperspectral data visualise the SOC heterogeneity more realistic than an interpolated map based on conventional soil sampling. In addition, the prediction of SOC over a time period of three years was possible. Soil texture is often referred to be the dominant soil property affecting the population density of the beet cyst nematode H. schachtii. The apparent electrical conductivity (ECa), which is known to be strongly related to soil texture and porosity, was measured with the non-invasive EM38 sensor. On fields heterogeneous in texture and porosity, moderate (R2 = 0.47) and strong (R2 = 0.74) correlations were observed between ECa and nematode population density. ECa values and soil taxation maps reveal that H. schachtii prefers deep soils with medium to light texture, a high proportion of wide pores and non-stagnic water conditions. Management maps on the basis of ECa and soil taxation maps indicate areas with different soil-related living conditions for H. schachtii. The spatial distribution and density of four weed species was observed within a long-term survey over nine years on an arable field and related to soil properties. The dominance of the weed species varied between the years, but the spatial patterns remained stable during the whole study period. Soil properties were analysed conventionally in the laboratory and via mid-infrared spectroscopy-partial least squares regression (MIRS-PLSR) or EM38 measurements. Multivariate statistics were used to describe the effect of soil properties, indicating that soil texture, available water capacity and SOC explained 28.2% of the weed species variability. The spatial distribution of soil properties can be used to create maps for site-specific weed management. The study provide evidence that minimal- and non-invasive sensor technologies such as MIRS-PLSR, airborne hyperspectral imaging or EM38 measurements are practical methods to detect soil heterogeneity at the field-scale. SOC and soil texture, both important parameters for the occurrence of soil-borne pests and weeds, can be characterised with high spatial resolution. Management maps on the basis of soil properties permit several benefits for precision crop protection, such as improved site-specific management strategies of pests and weeds

    Remote sensing in support of conservation and management of heathland vegetation

    Get PDF
    corecore