How does rumination impact cognition? A first mechanistic model.

Rumination is a process of uncontrolled, narrowly-foused neg- ative thinking that is often self-referential, and that is a hall- mark of depression. Despite its importance, little is known about its cognitive mechanisms. Rumination can be thought of as a specific, constrained form of mind-wandering. Here, we introduce a cognitive model of rumination that we devel- oped on the basis of our existing model of mind-wandering. The rumination model implements the hypothesis that rumina- tion is caused by maladaptive habits of thought. These habits of thought are modelled by adjusting the number of memory chunks and their associative structure, which changes the se- quence of memories that are retrieved during mind-wandering, such that during rumination the same set of negative memo- ries is retrieved repeatedly. The implementation of habits of thought was guided by empirical data from an experience sam- pling study in healthy and depressed participants. On the ba- sis of this empirically-derived memory structure, our model naturally predicts the declines in cognitive task performance that are typically observed in depressed patients. This study demonstrates how we can use cognitive models to better un- derstand the cognitive mechanisms underlying rumination and depression

Neural and Behavioral Mechanisms of Interval Timing in the Striatum

To guide behavior and learn from its consequences, the brain must represent time over many scales. Yet, the neural signals used to encode time in the seconds to minute range are not known. The striatum is the major input area of the basal ganglia; it plays important roles in learning, motor function and normal timing behavior in the range of seconds to minutes. We investigated how striatal population activity might encode time. To do so, we recorded the electrical activity from striatal neurons in rats performing the serial fixed interval task, a dynamic version of the fixed Interval schedule of reinforcement. The animals performed in conformity with proportional timing, but did not strictly conform to scalar timing predictions, which might reflect a parallel strategy to optimize the adaptation to changes in temporal contingencies and consequently to improve reward rate over the session. Regarding the neural activity, we found that neurons fired at delays spanning tens of seconds and that this pattern of responding reflected the interaction between time and the animals’ ongoing sensorimotor state. Surprisingly, cells rescaled responses in time when intervals changed, indicating that striatal populations encoded relative time. Moreover, time estimates decoded from activity predicted trial-bytrial timing behavior as animals adjusted to new intervals, and disrupting striatal function with local infusion of muscimol led to a decrease in timing performance. Because of practical limitations in testing for sufficiency a biological system, we ran a simple simulation of the task; we have shown that neural responses similar to those we observe are conceptually sufficient to produce temporally adaptive behavior. Furthermore, we attempted to explain temporal processes on the basis of ongoing behavior by decoding temporal estimates from high-speed videos of the animals performing the task; we could not explain the temporal report solely on basis of ongoing behavior. These results suggest that striatal activity forms a scalable population firing rate code for time, providing timing signals that animals use to guide their actions

Affordances in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Robotics: A Survey

The concept of affordances appeared in psychology during the late 60s as an alternative perspective on the visual perception of the environment. It was revolutionary in the intuition that the way living beings perceive the world is deeply influenced by the actions they are able to perform. Then, across the last 40 years, it has influenced many applied fields, e.g., design, human-computer interaction, computer vision, and robotics. In this paper, we offer a multidisciplinary perspective on the notion of affordances. We first discuss the main definitions and formalizations of the affordance theory, then we report the most significant evidence in psychology and neuroscience that support it, and finally we review the most relevant applications of this concept in robotics