175,696 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Temporal and Relational Models for Causality: Representation and Learning
Discovering causal dependence is central to understanding the behavior of complex systems and to selecting actions that will achieve particular outcomes. The majority of work in this area has focused on propositional domains, where data instances are assumed to be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.). However, many real-world domains are inherently relational, i.e., they consist of multiple types of entities that interact with each other, and temporal, i.e., they change over time. This thesis focuses on causal modeling for these more complex relational and temporal domains. This thesis provides an in-depth investigation of the properties of relational models and is extending their expressivity to include a temporal dimension. Specifically, we first investigate alternative ways to ground relational models, and we provide an in-depth analysis of the impact of alternative grounding semantics for feature construction, causal effect estimation, and model selection. Then, we extend relational models to represent discrete time. We generalize the theory of d-separation for this class of temporal and relational models. Finally, we provide a constraint-based algorithm, TRCD, to learn the structure of temporal relational models from data
Adaptive Process Management in Cyber-Physical Domains
The increasing application of process-oriented approaches in new challenging cyber-physical domains beyond business computing (e.g., personalized healthcare, emergency management, factories of the future, home automation, etc.) has led to reconsider the level of flexibility and support required to manage complex processes in such domains. A cyber-physical domain is characterized by the presence of a cyber-physical system coordinating heterogeneous ICT components (PCs, smartphones, sensors, actuators) and involving real world entities (humans, machines, agents, robots, etc.) that perform complex tasks in the âphysicalâ real world to achieve a common goal. The physical world, however, is not entirely predictable, and processes enacted in cyber-physical domains must be robust to unexpected conditions and adaptable to unanticipated exceptions. This demands a more flexible approach in process design and enactment, recognizing that in real-world environments it is not adequate to assume that all possible recovery activities can be predefined for dealing with the exceptions that can ensue. In this chapter, we tackle the above issue and we propose a general approach, a concrete framework and a process management system implementation, called SmartPM, for automatically adapting processes enacted in cyber-physical domains in case of unanticipated exceptions and exogenous events. The adaptation mechanism provided by SmartPM is based on declarative task specifications, execution monitoring for detecting failures and context changes at run-time, and automated planning techniques to self-repair the running process, without requiring to predefine any specific adaptation policy or exception handler at design-time
A Methodology to Engineer and Validate Dynamic Multi-level Multi-agent Based Simulations
This article proposes a methodology to model and simulate complex systems,
based on IRM4MLS, a generic agent-based meta-model able to deal with
multi-level systems. This methodology permits the engineering of dynamic
multi-level agent-based models, to represent complex systems over several
scales and domains of interest. Its goal is to simulate a phenomenon using
dynamically the lightest representation to save computer resources without loss
of information. This methodology is based on two mechanisms: (1) the activation
or deactivation of agents representing different domain parts of the same
phenomenon and (2) the aggregation or disaggregation of agents representing the
same phenomenon at different scales.Comment: Presented at 3th International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based
Simulation, Valencia, Spain, 5th June 201
The challenge of complexity for cognitive systems
Complex cognition addresses research on (a) high-level cognitive processes â mainly problem solving, reasoning, and decision making â and their interaction with more basic processes such as perception, learning, motivation and emotion and (b) cognitive processes which take place in a complex, typically dynamic, environment. Our focus is on AI systems and cognitive models dealing with complexity and on psychological findings which can inspire or challenge cognitive systems research. In this overview we first motivate why we have to go beyond models for rather simple cognitive processes and reductionist experiments. Afterwards, we give a characterization of complexity from our perspective. We introduce the triad of cognitive science methods â analytical, empirical, and engineering methods â which in our opinion have all to be utilized to tackle complex cognition. Afterwards we highlight three aspects of complex cognition â complex problem solving, dynamic decision making, and learning of concepts, skills and strategies. We conclude with some reflections about and challenges for future research
GTA: Groupware task analysis Modeling complexity
The task analysis methods discussed in this presentation stem from Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Ethnography (as applied for the design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW), different disciplines that often are considered conflicting approaches when applied to the same design problems. Both approaches have their strength and weakness, and an integration of them does add value to the early stages of design of cooperation technology. In order to develop an integrated method for groupware task analysis (GTA) a conceptual framework is presented that allows a systematic perspective on complex work phenomena. The framework features a triple focus, considering (a) people, (b) work, and (c) the situation. Integrating various task-modeling approaches requires vehicles for making design information explicit, for which an object oriented formalism will be suggested. GTA consists of a method and framework that have been developed during practical design exercises. Examples from some of these cases will illustrate our approach
- âŠ