291 research outputs found

    Model Free Command Filtered Backstepping Control for Marine Power Systems

    Get PDF

    Control of power electronic interfaces in distributed generation.

    Get PDF
    Renewable energy has gained popularity as an alternative resource for electric power generation. As such, Distributed Generation (DG) is expected to open new horizons to electric power generation. Most renewable energy sources cannot be connected to the load directly. Integration of the renewable energy sources with the load has brought new challenges in terms of the systemโ€™s stability, voltage regulation and power quality issues. For example, the output power, voltage and frequency of an example wind turbine depend on the wind speed, which fluctuate over time and cannot be forecasted accurately. At the same time, the nonlinearity of residential electrical load is steadily increasing with the growing use of devices with rectifiers at their front end. This nonlinearity of the load deviates both current and voltage waveforms in the distribution feeder from their sinusoidal shape, hence increasing the Total Harmonics Distortions (THD) and polluting the grid. Advances in Power Electronic Interfaces (PEI) have increased the viability of DG systems and enhanced controllability and power transfer capability. Power electronic converter as an interface between energy sources and the grid/load has a higher degree of controllability compared to electrical machine used as the generator. This controllability can be used to not only overcome the aforementioned shortfalls of integration of renewable energy with the grid/load but also to reduce THD and improve the power quality. As a consequence, design of a sophisticated controller that can take advantage of this controllability provided by PEIs to facilitate the integration of DG with the load and generate high quality power has become of great interest. In this study a set of nonlinear controllers and observers are proposed for the control of PEIs with different DG technologies. Lyapunov stability analysis, simulation and experimental results are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed control solution in terms of tracking objective and meeting the THD requirements of IEEE 519 and EN 50160 standards for US and European power systems, respectively

    Unknown dynamics estimator-based output-feedback control for nonlinear pure-feedback systems

    Get PDF
    Most existing adaptive control designs for nonlinear pure-feedback systems have been derived based on backstepping or dynamic surface control (DSC) methods, requiring full system states to be measurable. The neural networks (NNs) or fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) used to accommodate uncertainties also impose demanding computational cost and sluggish convergence. To address these issues, this paper proposes a new output-feedback control for uncertain pure-feedback systems without using backstepping and function approximator. A coordinate transform is first used to represent the pure-feedback system in a canonical form to evade using the backstepping or DSC scheme. Then the Levant's differentiator is used to reconstruct the unknown states of the derived canonical system. Finally, a new unknown system dynamics estimator with only one tuning parameter is developed to compensate for the lumped unknown dynamics in the feedback control. This leads to an alternative, simple approximation-free control method for pure-feedback systems, where only the system output needs to be measured. The stability of the closed-loop control system, including the unknown dynamics estimator and the feedback control is proved. Comparative simulations and experiments based on a PMSM test-rig are carried out to test and validate the effectiveness of the proposed method

    Nonlinear control for Two-Link flexible manipulator

    Get PDF
    Recently the use of robot manipulators has been increasing in many applications such as medical applications, automobile, construction, manufacturing, military, space, etc. However, current rigid manipulators have high inertia and use actuators with large energy consumption. Moreover, rigid manipulators are slow and have low payload-to arm-mass ratios because link deformation is not allowed. The main advantages of flexible manipulators over rigid manipulators are light in weight, higher speed of operation, larger workspace, smaller actuator, lower energy consumption and lower cost. However, there is no adequate closed-form solutions exist for flexible manipulators. This is mainly because flexible dynamics are modeled with partial differential equations, which give rise to infinite dimensional dynamical systems that are, in general, not possible to represent exactly or efficiently on a computer which makes modeling a challenging task. In addition, if flexibility nature wasn\u27t considered, there will be calculation errors in the calculated torque requirement for the motors and in the calculated position of the end-effecter. As for the control task, it is considered as a complex task since flexible manipulators are non-minimum phase system, under-actuated system and Multi-Input/Multi-Output (MIMO) nonlinear system. This thesis focuses on the development of dynamic formulation model and three control techniques aiming to achieve accurate position control and improving dynamic stability for Two-Link Flexible Manipulators (TLFMs). LQR controller is designed based on the linearized model of the TLFM; however, it is applied on both linearized and nonlinear models. In addition to LQR, Backstepping and Sliding mode controllers are designed as nonlinear control approaches and applied on both the nonlinear model of the TLFM and the physical system. The three developed control techniques are tested through simulation based on the developed dynamic formulation model using MATLAB/SIMULINK. Stability and performance analysis were conducted and tuned to obtain the best results. Then, the performance and stability results obtained through simulation are compared. Finally, the developed control techniques were implemented and analyzed on the 2-DOF Serial Flexible Link Robot experimental system from Quanser and the results are illustrated and compared with that obtained through simulation

    Design, Implementation and Testing of Advanced Control Laws for Fixed-wing UAVs

    Get PDF
    The present PhD thesis addresses the problem of the control of small fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In the scientific community much research is dedicated to the study of suitable control laws for this category of aircraft. This interest is motivated by the several applications that these platforms can perform and by their peculiarities as dynamical systems. In fact, small UAVs are characterized by highly nonlinear behavior, strong coupling between longitudinal and latero-directional planes, and high sensitivity to external disturbances and to parametric uncertainties. Furthermore, the challenge is increased by the limited space and weight available for the onboard electronics. The aim of this PhD thesis is to provide a valid confrontation among three different control techniques and to introduce an innovative autopilot configuration suitable for the unmanned aircraft field. Three advanced controllers for fixed-wing unmanned aircraft vehicles are designed and implemented: PID with H1 robust approach, L1 adaptive controller and nonlinear backstepping controller. All of them are analyzed from the theoretical point of view and validated through numerical simulations with a mathematical UAV model. One is implemented on a microcontroller board, validated through hardware simulations and tested in flight. The PID with H1 robust approach is used for the definition of the gains of a commercial autopilot. The proposed technique combines traditional PID control with an H1 loop shaping method to assess the robustness characteristics achievable with simple PID gains. It is demonstrated that this hybrid approach provides a promising solution to the problem of tuning commercial autopilots for UAVs. Nevertheless, it is clear that a tradeoff between robustness and performance is necessary when dealing with this standard control technique. The robustness problem is effectively solved by the adoption of an L1 adaptive controller for complete aircraft control. In particular, the L1 logic here adopted is based on piecewise constant adaptive laws with an adaptation rate compatible with the sampling rate of an autopilot board CPU. The control scheme includes an L1 adaptive controller for the inner loop, while PID gains take care of the outer loop. The global controller is tuned on a linear decoupled aircraft model. It is demonstrated that the achieved configuration guarantees satisfying performance also when applied to a complete nonlinear model affected by uncertainties and parametric perturbations. The third controller implemented is based on an existing nonlinear backstepping technique. A scheme for longitudinal and latero-directional control based on the combination of PID for the outer loop and backstepping for the inner loop is proposed. Satisfying results are achieved also when the nonlinear aircraft model is perturbed by parametric uncertainties. A confrontation among the three controllers shows that L1 and backstepping are comparable in terms of nominal and robust performance, with an advantage for L1, while the PID is always inferior. The backstepping controller is chosen for being implemented and tested on a real fixed-wing RC aircraft. Hardware-in-the-loop simulations validate its real-time control capability on the complete nonlinear model of the aircraft adopted for the tests, inclusive of sensors noise. An innovative microcontroller technology is employed as core of the autopilot system, it interfaces with sensors and servos in order to handle input/output operations and it performs the control law computation. Preliminary ground tests validate the suitability of the autopilot configuration. A limited number of flight tests is performed. Promising results are obtained for the control of longitudinal states, while latero-directional control still needs major improvements

    Magnetic Microrobot Locomotion in Vascular System Using A Combination of Time Delay Control and Terminal Sliding Mode Approach

    Get PDF
    This thesis deals with designing a control law for trajectory tracking. The target is to move a microrobot in a blood vessel accurately. The microrobot is made of a ferromagnetic material and is propelled by a magnetic gradient coil. The controller combines time delay control (TDC) and terminal sliding mode (TSM) control. TDC allows deriving a control law without prior knowledge of the plant. As the system is a nonlinear function which also includes uncertainties and unexpected disturbance, TDC gives a benefit of less effort needed compared to model-based controller. Meanwhile, TSM term adds accuracy which it compensates TDC estimation error and also adds robustness against parameter variation and disturbance. In addition, anti-windup scheme acts as a support by eliminating the accumulated error due to integral term by TDC and TSM. So, the proposed controller can avoid actuator saturation problem caused by windup phenomenon. Simulations are conducted by copying a realistic situation. Accuracy and robustness evaluations are done in stages to see how each terms in a control law give an improvement and to see how an overall controller performs. โ“’ 2014 DGISTI. INTRODUCTION 1 -- 1.1. BACKGROUND 1 -- 1.2. RELATED RESEARCH 3 -- 1.3. OBJECTIVE 4 -- 1.4. SPECIFICATION 4 -- 1.5. SCOPE 5 -- 1.6. OVERVIEW 5 -- II. METHOD 6 -- 2.1. TIME DELAY CONTROL 6 -- 2.2. TERMINAL SLIDING MODE 9 -- 2.3. ANTI-WINDUP SCHEME 11 -- 2.4. PRACTICAL APPROACH 14 -- 2.4.1. FEEDBACK SIGNAL 14 -- 2.4.2. CONTROLLER GAIN SELECTION 15 -- 2.4.3. MEASUREMENT NOISE 16 -- 2.5. ADVANTAGES AND DRAWBACKS 16 -- III. RESULTS 17 -- 3.1. SIMULATION SETUP 17 -- 3.1.1. PLANT MODELING 18 -- 3.1.2. ACTUATOR AND POSITION SENSOR MODELING 20 -- 3.1.3. TRAJECTORY 21 -- 3.1.4. SIMULATION PARAMETER 21 -- 3.1.5. CONTROLLER TARGET 24 -- 3.2. ACCURACY AND ROBUSTNESS EVALUATION 24 -- 3.3. ANTI-WINDUP SCHEME EVALUATION 32 -- 3.4. SOLUTION FOR MEASUREMENT NOISE 35 -- 3.5. 2D SIMULATION 46 -- CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK 49 -- REFERENCES 50 -- ์š” ์•ฝ ๋ฌธ(ABSTRACT IN KOREAN) 52์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์ถ”์ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ๊ฐ•์ž์„ฑ์ฒด ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๊ณ  ์ž๊ธฐ์žฅ์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ์ถ”์ง„ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ง€์—ฐ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•(time delay control)๊ณผ terminal sliding ์ปจํŠธ๋กค์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. TDC๋Š” ํ”Œ๋žœํŠธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํ–‰ ์ง€์‹ ์—†์ด ์ ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•จ๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์ƒ์น˜ ๋ชปํ•œ ์™ธ๋ž€์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ์ผ ๋•Œ TDC๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ ์€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ๋“œ๋Š” ์žฅ์ •์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, TSM์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋”ํ•˜์—ฌ TDC์˜ ์ฃผ์ •์—๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ๋˜ํ•œ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ์™ธ๋ž€์— ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•จ์„ ๋”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ์•ˆํ‹ฐ ์™€์ธ๋“œ ์—…์€ TDC์™€ TSM์˜ ์ ๋ถ„ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ถ•์ ๋˜๋Š” ์—๋Ÿฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๋Š” ์™€์ธ๋“œ์—… ํ˜„์ƒ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ž‘๋™๊ธฐ์˜ ํฌํ™”ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์€ ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•จ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฐœ์„ ์ ์„ ๋ณด๋Š” ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. โ“’ 2014 DGISTMasterdCollectio

    Design and Control of Electrical Motor Drives

    Get PDF
    Dear Colleagues, I am very happy to have this Special Issue of the journal Energies on the topic of Design and Control of Electrical Motor Drives published. Electrical motor drives are widely used in the industry, automation, transportation, and home appliances. Indeed, rolling mills, machine tools, high-speed trains, subway systems, elevators, electric vehicles, air conditioners, all depend on electrical motor drives.However, the production of effective and practical motors and drives requires flexibility in the regulation of current, torque, flux, acceleration, position, and speed. Without proper modeling, drive, and control, these motor drive systems cannot function effectively.To address these issues, we need to focus on the design, modeling, drive, and control of different types of motors, such as induction motors, permanent magnet synchronous motors, brushless DC motors, DC motors, synchronous reluctance motors, switched reluctance motors, flux-switching motors, linear motors, and step motors.Therefore, relevant research topics in this field of study include modeling electrical motor drives, both in transient and in steady-state, and designing control methods based on novel control strategies (e.g., PI controllers, fuzzy logic controllers, neural network controllers, predictive controllers, adaptive controllers, nonlinear controllers, etc.), with particular attention to transient responses, load disturbances, fault tolerance, and multi-motor drive techniques. This Special Issue include original contributions regarding recent developments and ideas in motor design, motor drive, and motor control. The topics include motor design, field-oriented control, torque control, reliability improvement, advanced controllers for motor drive systems, DSP-based sensorless motor drive systems, high-performance motor drive systems, high-efficiency motor drive systems, and practical applications of motor drive systems. I want to sincerely thank authors, reviewers, and staff members for their time and efforts. Prof. Dr. Tian-Hua Liu Guest Edito

    Adaptive fuzzy tracking control for a class of singular systems via output feedback scheme

    Get PDF
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore