408 research outputs found
On the Correspondence between Display Postulates and Deep Inference in Nested Sequent Calculi for Tense Logics
We consider two styles of proof calculi for a family of tense logics,
presented in a formalism based on nested sequents. A nested sequent can be seen
as a tree of traditional single-sided sequents. Our first style of calculi is
what we call "shallow calculi", where inference rules are only applied at the
root node in a nested sequent. Our shallow calculi are extensions of Kashima's
calculus for tense logic and share an essential characteristic with display
calculi, namely, the presence of structural rules called "display postulates".
Shallow calculi enjoy a simple cut elimination procedure, but are unsuitable
for proof search due to the presence of display postulates and other structural
rules. The second style of calculi uses deep-inference, whereby inference rules
can be applied at any node in a nested sequent. We show that, for a range of
extensions of tense logic, the two styles of calculi are equivalent, and there
is a natural proof theoretic correspondence between display postulates and deep
inference. The deep inference calculi enjoy the subformula property and have no
display postulates or other structural rules, making them a better framework
for proof search
On Nested Sequents for Constructive Modal Logics
We present deductive systems for various modal logics that can be obtained
from the constructive variant of the normal modal logic CK by adding
combinations of the axioms d, t, b, 4, and 5. This includes the constructive
variants of the standard modal logics K4, S4, and S5. We use for our
presentation the formalism of nested sequents and give a syntactic proof of cut
elimination.Comment: 33 page
Dual-Context Calculi for Modal Logic
We present natural deduction systems and associated modal lambda calculi for
the necessity fragments of the normal modal logics K, T, K4, GL and S4. These
systems are in the dual-context style: they feature two distinct zones of
assumptions, one of which can be thought as modal, and the other as
intuitionistic. We show that these calculi have their roots in in sequent
calculi. We then investigate their metatheory, equip them with a confluent and
strongly normalizing notion of reduction, and show that they coincide with the
usual Hilbert systems up to provability. Finally, we investigate a categorical
semantics which interprets the modality as a product-preserving functor.Comment: Full version of article previously presented at LICS 2017 (see
arXiv:1602.04860v4 or doi: 10.1109/LICS.2017.8005089
Positive Logic with Adjoint Modalities: Proof Theory, Semantics and Reasoning about Information
We consider a simple modal logic whose non-modal part has conjunction and
disjunction as connectives and whose modalities come in adjoint pairs, but are
not in general closure operators. Despite absence of negation and implication,
and of axioms corresponding to the characteristic axioms of (e.g.) T, S4 and
S5, such logics are useful, as shown in previous work by Baltag, Coecke and the
first author, for encoding and reasoning about information and misinformation
in multi-agent systems. For such a logic we present an algebraic semantics,
using lattices with agent-indexed families of adjoint pairs of operators, and a
cut-free sequent calculus. The calculus exploits operators on sequents, in the
style of "nested" or "tree-sequent" calculi; cut-admissibility is shown by
constructive syntactic methods. The applicability of the logic is illustrated
by reasoning about the muddy children puzzle, for which the calculus is
augmented with extra rules to express the facts of the muddy children scenario.Comment: This paper is the full version of the article that is to appear in
the ENTCS proceedings of the 25th conference on the Mathematical Foundations
of Programming Semantics (MFPS), April 2009, University of Oxfor
- …