A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems

This survey covers research into mixed criticality systems that has been published since Vestal’s seminal paper in 2007, up until the end of 2016. The survey is organised along the lines of the major research areas within this topic. These include single processor analysis (including fixed priority and EDF scheduling, shared resources and static and synchronous scheduling), multiprocessor analysis, realistic models, and systems issues. The survey also explores the relationship between research into mixed criticality systems and other topics such as hard and soft time constraints, fault tolerant scheduling, hierarchical scheduling, cyber physical systems, probabilistic real-time systems, and industrial safety standards

Re-use of tests and arguments for assesing dependable mixed-critically systems

The safety assessment of mixed-criticality systems (MCS) is a challenging activity due to system heterogeneity, design constraints and increasing complexity. The foundation for MCSs is the integrated architecture paradigm, where a compact hardware comprises multiple execution platforms and communication interfaces to implement concurrent functions with different safety requirements. Besides a computing platform providing adequate isolation and fault tolerance mechanism, the development of an MCS application shall also comply with the guidelines defined by the safety standards. A way to lower the overall MCS certification cost is to adopt a platform-based design (PBD) development approach. PBD is a model-based development (MBD) approach, where separate models of logic, hardware and deployment support the analysis of the resulting system properties and behaviour. The PBD development of MCSs benefits from a composition of modular safety properties (e.g. modular safety cases), which support the derivation of mixed-criticality product lines. The validation and verification (V&V) activities claim a substantial effort during the development of programmable electronics for safety-critical applications. As for the MCS dependability assessment, the purpose of the V&V is to provide evidences supporting the safety claims. The model-based development of MCSs adds more V&V tasks, because additional analysis (e.g., simulations) need to be carried out during the design phase. During the MCS integration phase, typically hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) plant simulators support the V&V campaigns, where test automation and fault-injection are the key to test repeatability and thorough exercise of the safety mechanisms. This dissertation proposes several V&V artefacts re-use strategies to perform an early verification at system level for a distributed MCS, artefacts that later would be reused up to the final stages in the development process: a test code re-use to verify the fault-tolerance mechanisms on a functional model of the system combined with a non-intrusive software fault-injection, a model to X-in-the-loop (XiL) and code-to-XiL re-use to provide models of the plant and distributed embedded nodes suited to the HiL simulator, and finally, an argumentation framework to support the automated composition and staged completion of modular safety-cases for dependability assessment, in the context of the platform-based development of mixed-criticality systems relying on the DREAMS harmonized platform.La dificultad para evaluar la seguridad de los sistemas de criticidad mixta (SCM) aumenta con la heterogeneidad del sistema, las restricciones de diseño y una complejidad creciente. Los SCM adoptan el paradigma de arquitectura integrada, donde un hardware embebido compacto comprende múltiples plataformas de ejecución e interfaces de comunicación para implementar funciones concurrentes y con diferentes requisitos de seguridad. Además de una plataforma de computación que provea un aislamiento y mecanismos de tolerancia a fallos adecuados, el desarrollo de una aplicación SCM además debe cumplir con las directrices definidas por las normas de seguridad. Una forma de reducir el coste global de la certificación de un SCM es adoptar un enfoque de desarrollo basado en plataforma (DBP). DBP es un enfoque de desarrollo basado en modelos (DBM), en el que modelos separados de lógica, hardware y despliegue soportan el análisis de las propiedades y el comportamiento emergente del sistema diseñado. El desarrollo DBP de SCMs se beneficia de una composición modular de propiedades de seguridad (por ejemplo, casos de seguridad modulares), que facilitan la definición de líneas de productos de criticidad mixta. Las actividades de verificación y validación (V&V) representan un esfuerzo sustancial durante el desarrollo de aplicaciones basadas en electrónica confiable. En la evaluación de la seguridad de un SCM el propósito de las actividades de V&V es obtener las evidencias que apoyen las aseveraciones de seguridad. El desarrollo basado en modelos de un SCM incrementa las tareas de V&V, porque permite realizar análisis adicionales (por ejemplo, simulaciones) durante la fase de diseño. En las campañas de pruebas de integración de un SCM habitualmente se emplean simuladores de planta hardware-in-the-loop (HiL), en donde la automatización de pruebas y la inyección de faltas son la clave para la repetitividad de las pruebas y para ejercitar completamente los mecanismos de tolerancia a fallos. Esta tesis propone diversas estrategias de reutilización de artefactos de V&V para la verificación temprana de un MCS distribuido, artefactos que se emplearán en ulteriores fases del desarrollo: la reutilización de código de prueba para verificar los mecanismos de tolerancia a fallos sobre un modelo funcional del sistema combinado con una inyección de fallos de software no intrusiva, la reutilización de modelo a X-in-the-loop (XiL) y código a XiL para obtener modelos de planta y nodos distribuidos aptos para el simulador HiL y, finalmente, un marco de argumentación para la composición automatizada y la compleción escalonada de casos de seguridad modulares, en el contexto del desarrollo basado en plataformas de sistemas de criticidad mixta empleando la plataforma armonizada DREAMS.Kritikotasun nahastuko sistemen segurtasun ebaluazioa jarduera neketsua da beraien heterogeneotasuna dela eta. Sistema hauen oinarria arkitektura integratuen paradigman datza, non hardware konpaktu batek exekuzio plataforma eta komunikazio interfaze ugari integratu ahal dituen segurtasun baldintza desberdineko funtzio konkurrenteak inplementatzeko. Konputazio plataformek isolamendu eta akatsen aurkako mekanismo egokiak emateaz gain, segurtasun arauek definituriko jarraibideak jarraitu behar dituzte kritikotasun mistodun aplikazioen garapenean. Sistema hauen zertifikazio prozesuaren kostua murrizteko aukera bat plataformetan oinarritutako garapenean (PBD) datza. Garapen planteamendu hau modeloetan oinarrituriko garapena da (MBD) non modeloaren logika, hardware eta garapen desberdinak sistemaren propietateen eta portaeraren aurka aztertzen diren. Kritikotasun mistodun sistemen PBD garapenak etekina ateratzen dio moduluetan oinarrituriko segurtasun propietateei, adibidez: segurtasun kasu modularrak (MSC). Modulu hauek kritikotasun mistodun produktu-lerroak ere hartzen dituzte kontutan. Berifikazio eta balioztatze (V&V) jarduerek esfortzu kontsideragarria eskatzen dute segurtasun-kiritikoetarako elektronika programagarrien garapenean. Kritikotasun mistodun sistemen konfiantzaren ebaluazioaren eta V&V jardueren helburua segurtasun eskariak jasotzen dituzten frogak proportzionatzea da. Kritikotasun mistodun sistemen modelo bidezko garapenek zeregin gehigarriak atxikitzen dizkio V&V jarduerari, fase honetan analisi gehigarriak (hots, simulazioak) zehazten direlako. Bestalde, kritikotasun mistodun sistemen integrazio fasean, hardware-in-the-loop (Hil) simulazio plantek V&V iniziatibak sostengatzen dituzte non testen automatizazioan eta akatsen txertaketan funtsezko jarduerak diren. Jarduera hauek frogen errepikapena eta segurtasun mekanismoak egiaztzea ahalbidetzen dute. Tesi honek V&V artefaktuen berrerabilpenerako estrategiak proposatzen ditu, kritikotasun mistodun sistemen egiaztatze azkarrerako sistema mailan eta garapen prozesuko azken faseetaraino erabili daitezkeenak. Esate baterako, test kodearen berrabilpena akats aurkako mekanismoak egiaztatzeko, modelotik X-in-the-loop (XiL)-ra eta kodetik XiL-rako konbertsioa HiL simulaziorako eta argumentazio egitura bat DREAMS Europear proiektuan definituriko arkitektura estiloan oinarrituriko segurtasun kasu modularrak automatikoki eta gradualki sortzeko

Combining Task-level and System-level Scheduling Modes for Mixed Criticality Systems

Different scheduling algorithms for mixed criticality systems have been recently proposed. The common denominator of these algorithms is to discard low critical tasks whenever high critical tasks are in lack of computation resources. This is achieved upon a switch of the scheduling mode from Normal to Critical. We distinguish two main categories of the algorithms: system-level mode switch and task-level mode switch. System-level mode algorithms allow low criticality (LC) tasks to execute only in normal mode. Task-level mode switch algorithms enable to switch the mode of an individual high criticality task (HC), from low (LO) to high (HI), to obtain priority over all LC tasks. This paper investigates an online scheduling algorithm for mixed-criticality systems that supports dynamic mode switches for both task level and system level. When a HC task job overruns its LC budget, then only that particular job is switched to HI mode. If the job cannot be accommodated, then the system switches to Critical mode. To accommodate for resource availability of the HC jobs, the LC tasks are degraded by stretching their periods until the Critical mode exhibiting job complete its execution. The stretching will be carried out until the resource availability is met. We have mechanized and implemented the proposed algorithm using Uppaal. To study the efficiency of our scheduling algorithm, we examine a case study and compare our results to the state of the art algorithms.Comment: \copyright 2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other work

CONTREX: Design of embedded mixed-criticality CONTRol systems under consideration of EXtra-functional properties

The increasing processing power of today’s HW/SW platforms leads to the integration of more and more functions in a single device. Additional design challenges arise when these functions share computing resources and belong to different criticality levels. CONTREX complements current activities in the area of predictable computing platforms and segregation mechanisms with techniques to consider the extra-functional properties, i.e., timing constraints, power, and temperature. CONTREX enables energy efficient and cost aware design through analysis and optimization of these properties with regard to application demands at different criticality levels. This article presents an overview of the CONTREX European project, its main innovative technology (extension of a model based design approach, functional and extra-functional analysis with executable models and run-time management) and the final results of three industrial use-cases from different domain (avionics, automotive and telecommunication).The work leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2011 under grant agreement no. 611146

How realistic is the mixed-criticality real-time system model?

23rd International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems (RTNS 2015). 4 to 6, Nov, 2015, Main Track. Lille, France. Best Paper Award NomineeWith the rapid evolution of commercial hardware platforms, in most application domains, the industry has shown a growing interest in integrating and running independently-developed applications of different “criticalities” in the same multicore platform. Such integrated systems are commonly referred to as mixed-criticality systems (MCS). Most of the MCS-related research published in the state-of-the-art cite the safety-related standards associated to each application domain (e.g. aeronautics, space, railway, automotive) to justify their methods and results. However, those standards are not, in most cases, freely available, and do not always clearly and explicitly specify the requirements for mixed-criticality systems. This paper addresses the important challenge of unveiling the relevant information available in some of the safety-related standards, such that the mixed-criticality concept is understood from an industrialist’s perspective. Moreover, the paper evaluates the state-of-the-art mixed-criticality real-time scheduling models and algorithms against the safety-related standards and clarifies some misconceptions that are commonly encountered

Mixed Criticality Systems - A Review : (13th Edition, February 2022)

This review covers research on the topic of mixed criticality systems that has been published since Vestal’s 2007 paper. It covers the period up to end of 2021. The review is organised into the following topics: introduction and motivation, models, single processor analysis (including job-based, hard and soft tasks, fixed priority and EDF scheduling, shared resources and static and synchronous scheduling), multiprocessor analysis, related topics, realistic models, formal treatments, systems issues, industrial practice and research beyond mixed-criticality. A list of PhDs awarded for research relating to mixed-criticality systems is also included

A Hierarchical Variable Autonomy Mixed-Initiative Framework for Human-Robot Teaming in Mobile Robotics

This paper presents a Mixed-Initiative (MI) framework for addressing the problem of control authority transfer between a remote human operator and an AI agent when cooperatively controlling a mobile robot. Our Hierarchical Expert-guided Mixed-Initiative Control Switcher (HierEMICS) leverages information on the human operator's state and intent. The control switching policies are based on a criticality hierarchy. An experimental evaluation was conducted in a high-fidelity simulated disaster response and remote inspection scenario, comparing HierEMICS with a state-of-the-art Expert-guided Mixed-Initiative Control Switcher (EMICS) in the context of mobile robot navigation. Results suggest that HierEMICS reduces conflicts for control between the human and the AI agent, which is a fundamental challenge in both the MI control paradigm and also in the related shared control paradigm. Additionally, we provide statistically significant evidence of improved, navigational safety (i.e., fewer collisions), LOA switching efficiency, and conflict for control reduction.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, ICHMS 2022, First two Authors contributed equall

Ordonnancement des systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité

Real-time safety-critical systems must complete their tasks within a given time limit. Failure to successfully perform their operations, or missing a deadline, can have severe consequences such as destruction of property and/or loss of life. Examples of such systems include automotive systems, drones and avionics among others. Safety guarantees must be provided before these systems can be deemed usable. This is usually done through certification performed by a certification authority.Safety evaluation and certification are complicated and costly even for smaller systems.One answer to these difficulties is the isolation of the critical functionality. Executing tasks of different criticalities on separate platforms prevents non-critical tasks from interfering with critical ones, provides a higher guaranty of safety and simplifies the certification process limiting it to only the critical functions. But this separation, in turn, introduces undesirable results portrayed by an inefficient resource utilization, an increase in the cost, weight, size and energy consumption which can put a system in a competitive disadvantage.To overcome the drawbacks of isolation, Mixed Criticality (MC) systems can be used. These systems allow functionalities with different criticalities to execute on the same platform. In 2007, Vestal proposed a model to represent MC-systems where tasks have multiple Worst Case Execution Times (WCETs), one for each criticality level. In addition, correctness conditions for scheduling policies were formally defined, allowing lower criticality jobs to miss deadlines or be even dropped in cases of failure or emergency situations.The introduction of multiple WCETs and different conditions for correctness increased the difficulty of the scheduling problem for MC-systems. Conventional scheduling policies and schedulability tests proved inadequate and the need for new algorithms arose. Since then, a lot of work has been done in this field.In this thesis, we contribute to the study of schedulability in MC-systems. The workload of a system is represented as a set of jobs that can describe the execution over the hyper-period of tasks or over a duration in time. This model allows us to study the viability of simulation-based correctness tests in MC-systems. We show that simulation tests can still be used in mixed-criticality systems, but in this case, the schedulability of the worst case scenario is no longer sufficient to guarantee the schedulability of the system even for the fixed priority scheduling case. We show that scheduling policies are not predictable in general, and define the concept of weak-predictability for MC-systems. We prove that a specific class of fixed priority policies are weakly predictable and propose two simulation-based correctness tests that work for weakly-predictable policies.We also demonstrate that contrary to what was believed, testing for correctness can not be done only through a linear number of preemptions.The majority of the related work focuses on systems of two criticality levels due to the difficulty of the problem. But for automotive and airborne systems, industrial standards define four or five criticality levels, which motivated us to propose a scheduling algorithm that schedules mixed-criticality systems with theoretically any number of criticality levels. We show experimentally that it has higher success rates compared to the state of the art.We illustrate how our scheduling algorithm, or any algorithm that generates a single time-triggered table for each criticality mode, can be used as a recovery strategy to ensure the safety of the system in case of certain failures.Finally, we propose a high level concurrency language and a model for designing an MC-system with coarse grained multi-core interference.Les systèmes temps-réel critiques doivent exécuter leurs tâches dans les délais impartis. En cas de défaillance, des événements peuvent avoir des catastrophes économiques. Des classifications des défaillances par rapport aux niveaux des risques encourus ont été établies, en particulier dans les domaines des transports aéronautique et automobile. Des niveaux de criticité sont attribués aux différentes fonctions des systèmes suivant les risques encourus lors d'une défaillance et des probabilités d'apparition de celles-ci. Ces différents niveaux de criticité influencent les choix d'architecture logicielle et matérielle ainsi que le type de composants utilisés pour sa réalisation. Les systèmes temps-réels modernes ont tendance à intégrer sur une même plateforme de calcul plusieurs applications avec différents niveaux de criticité. Cette intégration est nécessaire pour des systèmes modernes comme par exemple les drones (UAV) afin de réduire le coût, le poids et la consommation d'énergie. Malheureusement, elle conduit à des difficultés importantes lors de leurs conceptions. En plus, ces systèmes doivent être certifiés en prenant en compte ces différents niveaux de criticités.Il est bien connu que le problème d'ordonnancement des systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticités représente un des plus grand défi dans le domaine de systèmes temps-réel. Les techniques traditionnelles proposent comme solution l’isolation complète entre les niveaux de criticité ou bien une certification globale au plus haut niveau. Malheureusement, une telle solution conduit à une mauvaise des ressources et à la perte de l’avantage de cette intégration. En 2007, Vestal a proposé un modèle pour représenter les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité dont les tâches ont plusieurs temps d’exécution, un pour chaque niveau de criticité. En outre, les conditions de validité des stratégies d’ordonnancement ont été définies de manière formelle, permettant ainsi aux tâches les moins critiques d’échapper aux délais, voire d’être abandonnées en cas de défaillance ou de situation d’urgence.Les politiques de planification conventionnelles et les tests d’ordonnoncement se sont révélés inadéquats.Dans cette thèse, nous contribuons à l’étude de l’ordonnancement dans les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité. La surcharge d'un système est représentée sous la forme d'un ensemble de tâches pouvant décrire l'exécution sur l'hyper-période de tâches ou sur une durée donnée. Ce modèle nous permet d’étudier la viabilité des tests de correction basés sur la simulation pour les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité. Nous montrons que les tests de simulation peuvent toujours être utilisés pour ces systèmes, et la possibilité de l’ordonnancement du pire des scénarios ne suffit plus, même pour le cas de l’ordonnancement avec priorité fixe. Nous montrons que les politiques d'ordonnancement ne sont généralement pas prévisibles. Nous définissons le concept de faible prévisibilité pour les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité et nous montrons ensuite qu'une classe spécifique de stratégies à priorité fixe sont faiblement prévisibles. Nous proposons deux tests de correction basés sur la simulation qui fonctionnent pour des stratégies faiblement prévisibles.Nous montrons également que, contrairement à ce que l’on croyait, le contrôle de l’exactitude ne peut se faire que par l’intermédiaire d’un nombre linéaire de préemptions.La majorité des travaux reliés à notre domaine portent sur des systèmes à deux niveaux de criticité en raison de la difficulté du problème. Mais pour les systèmes automobiles et aériens, les normes industrielles définissent quatre ou cinq niveaux de criticité, ce qui nous a motivés à proposer un algorithme de planification qui planifie les systèmes à criticité mixte avec théoriquement un nombre quelconque de niveaux de criticité. Nous montrons expérimentalement que le taux de réussite est supérieur à celui de l’état de la technique