15 research outputs found

    MITIGATING NODE ISOLATION ATTACK IN OLSR PROTOCOL USING DCFM TECHNIQUE

    Get PDF
    A Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a collection of mobile devices which are connected by wireless links without the use of any fixed infrastructures or centralized access points. The Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol is an important proactive routing protocol designed for mobile ad hoc networks. It employs periodic exchange of messages to maintain topology information of the network at each node. Based on topology information, each node is able to calculate the optimal route to a destination. One major DoS attack against the Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) known as the node isolation attack occurs when topological knowledge of the network is exploited by an attacker who is able to isolate the victim from the rest of the network and subsequently deny communication services to the victim. The proposed method named Denial Contradictions with Fictitious Node Mechanism (DCFM) relies on the internal knowledge acquired by each node during routine routing, and augmentation of virtual (fictitious) nodes. Moreover, DCFM utilizes the same techniques used by the attack in order to prevent it. DCFM successfully prevents the attack, specifically in the realistic scenario in which all nodes in the network are mobile

    A Study on Preventing Node Isolation Attack in OLSR Protocol

    Get PDF
    AbstractA mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a wireless communication system of continuously self-configuring and infrastructure-less network of mobile devices which can move independently in any direction at any time.Routing protocols is required for message exchange in MANET. The most widely used routing protocol is OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing Protocol). It is efficient in bandwidth utilization and path calculation. But it is vulnerable to many types of attacks. In this paper, we discuss about various methods used to prevent a type of Denial of Service (DoS) attack called the node isolation attack that is capable to compromise OLSR protocol

    AODV (ST_AODV) on MANETs with Path Security and Trust-based Routing

    Get PDF
    The nodes of the MANET are connected by an autonomous that has no predetermined structure (Mobile ad hoc Network). When a node's proximity to other nodes is maintained dynamically via the use of relying nodes, the MANET network's node-to-node connection is un-trusted because of node mobility. If a node relies on self-resources at any point in time, it runs the risk of acting as a selfish or malicious node, the untrusted selfish or malicious node in the network. An end-to-end routing route that is secure has been presented to enhance the security of the path based on the AODV routing protocol using ST AODV (Secure and Trust ADV). To do this, we must first identify the selfish/malicious nodes in the network and analyse their past activity to determine their current trust levels. A node's stage of belief is indicated by the packet messages it sends. In order to resolve each route, trust must be identified and the path's metadata in RREP must be updated

    SEAD-FHC: Secure Efficient Distance Vector Routing with Fixed Hash Chain length

    Get PDF
    Ad hoc networks are highly dynamic routing networks cooperated by a collection of wireless mobile hosts without any assistance of a centralized access point. Secure Efficient Ad hoc Distance Vector (SEAD) is a proactive routing protocol, based on the design of Destination Sequenced Distance Vector routing protocol (DSDV). SEAD provides a robust protocol against attackers trying to create incorrect routing state in the other node. However, the computational cost creating and evaluating hash chain increases if number of hops in routing path increased. In this paper, we propose Secure Efficient Ad hoc Distance Vector with fixed hash chain length in short SEAD-FHC protocol to minimize and stabilize the computational complexity that leads minimization in delay time and maximization in throughput. A series of simulation experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance

    APALLS: A Secure MANET Routing Protocol

    Get PDF

    Applications of Repeated Games in Wireless Networks: A Survey

    Full text link
    A repeated game is an effective tool to model interactions and conflicts for players aiming to achieve their objectives in a long-term basis. Contrary to static noncooperative games that model an interaction among players in only one period, in repeated games, interactions of players repeat for multiple periods; and thus the players become aware of other players' past behaviors and their future benefits, and will adapt their behavior accordingly. In wireless networks, conflicts among wireless nodes can lead to selfish behaviors, resulting in poor network performances and detrimental individual payoffs. In this paper, we survey the applications of repeated games in different wireless networks. The main goal is to demonstrate the use of repeated games to encourage wireless nodes to cooperate, thereby improving network performances and avoiding network disruption due to selfish behaviors. Furthermore, various problems in wireless networks and variations of repeated game models together with the corresponding solutions are discussed in this survey. Finally, we outline some open issues and future research directions.Comment: 32 pages, 15 figures, 5 tables, 168 reference

    Securing routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks

    Get PDF
    A Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is more prone to security threats than other wired and wireless networks because of the distributed nature of the network. Conventional MANET routing protocols assume that all nodes cooperate without maliciously disrupting the operation of the protocol and do not provide defence against attackers. Blackhole and flooding attacks have a dramatic negative impact while grayhole and selfish attacks have a little negative impact on the performance of MANET routing protocols. Malicious nodes or misbehaviour actions detection in the network is an important task to maintain the proper routing protocol operation. Current solutions cannot guarantee the true classification of nodes because the cooperative nature of the MANETs which leads to false exclusions of innocent nodes and/or good classification of malicious nodes. The thesis introduces a new concept of Self- Protocol Trustiness (SPT) to discover malicious nodes with a very high trustiness ratio of a node classification. Designing and implementing new mechanisms that can resist flooding and blackhole attacks which have high negative impacts on the performance of these reactive protocols is the main objective of the thesis. The design of these mechanisms is based on SPT concept to ensure the high trustiness ratio of node classification. In addition, they neither incorporate the use of cryptographic algorithms nor depend on routing packet formats which make these solutions robust and reliable, and simplify their implementations in different MANET reactive protocols. Anti-Flooding (AF) mechanism is designed to resist flooding attacks which relies on locally applied timers and thresholds to classify nodes as malicious. Although AF mechanism succeeded in discovering malicious nodes within a small time, it has a number of thresholds that enable attacker to subvert the algorithm and cannot guarantee that the excluded nodes are genuine malicious nodes which was the motivation to develop this algorithm. On the other hand, Flooding Attack Resisting Mechanism (FARM) is designed to close the security gaps and overcome the drawbacks of AF mechanism. It succeeded in detecting and excluding more than 80% of flooding nodes within the simulation time with a very high trustiness ratio. Anti-Blackhole (AB) mechanism is designed to resist blackhole attacks and relies on a single threshold. The algorithm guarantees 100% exclusion of blackhole nodes and does not exclude any innocent node that may forward a reply packet. Although AB mechanism succeeded in discovering malicious nodes within a small time, the only suggested threshold enables an attacker to subvert the algorithm which was the motivation to develop it. On the other hand, Blackhole Resisting Mechanism (BRM) has the main advantages of AB mechanism while it is designed to close the security gaps and overcome the drawbacks of AB mechanism. It succeeded in detecting and excluding the vast majority of blackhole nodes within the simulation time
    corecore