75,762 research outputs found

    Question-Driven Methodology for Analyzing Emergency Room Processes Using Process Mining

    Full text link
    [EN] In order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Emergency Rooms (ER), it is important to provide answers to frequently-posed questions regarding all relevant processes executed therein. Process mining provides different techniques and tools that help to obtain insights into the analyzed processes and help to answer these questions. However, ER experts require certain guidelines in order to carry out process mining effectively. This article proposes a number of solutions, including a classification of the frequently-posed questions about ER processes, a data reference model to guide the extraction of data from the information systems that support these processes and a question-driven methodology specific for ER. The applicability of the latter is illustrated by means of a case study of an ER service in Chile, in which ER experts were able to obtain a better understanding of how they were dealing with episodes related to specific pathologies, triage severity and patient discharge destinations.This project was partially funded by Fondecyt Grants 1150365 and 11130577 from the Chilean National Commission on Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), the Ph.D. Scholarship Program of CONICYT Chile (CONICYT-Doctorado Nacional/2014-63140180), the Ph.D. Scholarship Program of CONICIT Costa Rica and by Universidad de Costa Rica Professor Fellowships.Rojas, E.; Sepúlveda, M.; Munoz-Gama, J.; Capurro, D.; Traver Salcedo, V.; Fernández Llatas, C. (2017). Question-Driven Methodology for Analyzing Emergency Room Processes Using Process Mining. Applied Sciences. 7(3):1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030302S12973Welch, S. J., Asplin, B. R., Stone-Griffith, S., Davidson, S. J., Augustine, J., & Schuur, J. (2011). Emergency Department Operational Metrics, Measures and Definitions: Results of the Second Performance Measures and Benchmarking Summit. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 58(1), 33-40. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.040Jansen-Vullers, M., & Reijers, H. (2005). Business Process Redesign in Healthcare: Towards a Structured Approach. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 43(4), 321-339. doi:10.1080/03155986.2005.11732733Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (1999). Evidence-Based Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 25(10), 503-513. doi:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30464-3Fernández-Llatas, C., Meneu, T., Traver, V., & Benedi, J.-M. (2013). Applying Evidence-Based Medicine in Telehealth: An Interactive Pattern Recognition Approximation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(11), 5671-5682. doi:10.3390/ijerph10115671Radnor, Z. J., Holweg, M., & Waring, J. (2012). Lean in healthcare: The unfilled promise? Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 364-371. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.011Rojas, E., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M., & Capurro, D. (2016). Process mining in healthcare: A literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 61, 224-236. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.04.007Neumuth, T., Jannin, P., Schlomberg, J., Meixensberger, J., Wiedemann, P., & Burgert, O. (2010). Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 6(1), 59-71. doi:10.1007/s11548-010-0475-yFernandez-Llatas, C., Lizondo, A., Monton, E., Benedi, J.-M., & Traver, V. (2015). Process Mining Methodology for Health Process Tracking Using Real-Time Indoor Location Systems. Sensors, 15(12), 29821-29840. doi:10.3390/s151229769Rebuge, Á., & Ferreira, D. R. (2012). Business process analysis in healthcare environments: A methodology based on process mining. Information Systems, 37(2), 99-116. doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.01.003Partington, A., Wynn, M., Suriadi, S., Ouyang, C., & Karnon, J. (2015). Process Mining for Clinical Processes. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 5(4), 1-18. doi:10.1145/2629446Basole, R. C., Braunstein, M. L., Kumar, V., Park, H., Kahng, M., Chau, D. H. (Polo), … Thompson, M. (2015). Understanding variations in pediatric asthma care processes in the emergency department using visual analytics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(2), 318-323. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu016Suriadi, S., Andrews, R., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & Wynn, M. T. (2017). Event log imperfection patterns for process mining: Towards a systematic approach to cleaning event logs. Information Systems, 64, 132-150. doi:10.1016/j.is.2016.07.011De Medeiros, A. K. A., Weijters, A. J. M. M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 14(2), 245-304. doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0061-7Aalst, W. M. P. van der. (2005). Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for Delta analysis and conformance testing. Requirements Engineering, 10(3), 198-211. doi:10.1007/s00766-005-0001-xVan der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., & van Dongen, B. (2012). Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(2), 182-192. doi:10.1002/widm.1045Song, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2008). Towards comprehensive support for organizational mining. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 300-317. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.07.00

    Prescriptions for Excellence in Health Care Summer 2008 Download Full Issue #4

    Get PDF

    Can the US Minimum Data Set Be Used for Predicting Admissions to Acute Care Facilities?

    Get PDF
    This paper is intended to give an overview of Knowledge Discovery in Large Datasets (KDD) and data mining applications in healthcare particularly as related to the Minimum Data Set, a resident assessment tool which is used in US long-term care facilities. The US Health Care Finance Administration, which mandates the use of this tool, has accumulated massive warehouses of MDS data. The pressure in healthcare to increase efficiency and effectiveness while improving patient outcomes requires that we find new ways to harness these vast resources. The intent of this preliminary study design paper is to discuss the development of an approach which utilizes the MDS, in conjunction with KDD and classification algorithms, in an attempt to predict admission from a long-term care facility to an acute care facility. The use of acute care services by long term care residents is a negative outcome, potentially avoidable, and expensive. The value of the MDS warehouse can be realized by the use of the stored data in ways that can improve patient outcomes and avoid the use of expensive acute care services. This study, when completed, will test whether the MDS warehouse can be used to describe patient outcomes and possibly be of predictive value

    Automated Measurement of Adherence to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Guidelines using Neurological ICU Data

    Get PDF
    Using a combination of physiological and treatment information from neurological ICU data-sets, adherence to traumatic brain injury (TBI) guidelines on hypotension, intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is calculated automatically. The ICU output is evaluated to capture pressure events and actions taken by clinical staff for patient management, and are then re-expressed as simplified process models. The official TBI guidelines from the Brain Trauma Foundation are similarly evaluated, so the two structures can be compared and a quantifiable distance between the two calculated (the measure of adherence). The methods used include: the compilation of physiological and treatment information into event logs and subsequently process models; the expression of the BTF guidelines in process models within the real-time context of the ICU; a calculation of distance between the two processes using two algorithms (“Direct” and “Weighted”) building on work conducted in th e business process domain. Results are presented across two categories each with clinical utility (minute-by-minute and single patient stays) using a real ICU data-set. Results of two sample patients using a weighted algorithm show a non-adherence level of 6.25% for 42 mins and 56.25% for 708 mins and non-adherence of 18.75% for 17 minutes and 56.25% for 483 minutes. Expressed as two combinatorial metrics (duration/non-adherence (A) and duration * non-adherence (B)), which together indicate the clinical importance of the non-adherence, one has a mean of A=4.63 and B=10014.16 and the other a mean of A=0.43 and B=500.0
    corecore