Mining Scholarly Data for Fine-Grained Knowledge Graph Construction

Knowledge graphs (KG) are large network of entities and relationships, tipically expressed as RDF triples, relevant to a specific domain or an organization. Scientific Knowledge Graphs (SKGs) focus on the scholarly domain and typically contain metadata describing research publications such as authors, venues, organizations, research topics, and citations. The next big challenge in this field regards the generation of SKGs that also contain a explicit representation of the knowledge presented in research publications. In this paper, we present a preliminary approach that uses a set of NLP and Deep Learning methods for extracting entities and relationships from research publications and then integrates them in a KG. More specifically, we i) tackle the challenge of knowledge extraction by employing several state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing and Text Mining tools, ii) describe an approach for integrating entities and relationships generated by these tools, iii) analyse an automatically generated Knowledge Graph including 10, 425 entities and 25, 655 relationships derived from 12, 007 publications in the field of Semantic Web, and iv) discuss how Deep Learning methods can be applied to overcome some limitations of the current techniques

NLPContributions: An Annotation Scheme for Machine Reading of Scholarly Contributions in Natural Language Processing Literature

We describe an annotation initiative to capture the scholarly contributions in natural language processing (NLP) articles, particularly, for the articles that discuss machine learning (ML) approaches for various information extraction tasks. We develop the annotation task based on a pilot annotation exercise on 50 NLP-ML scholarly articles presenting contributions to five information extraction tasks 1. machine translation, 2. named entity recognition, 3. question answering, 4. relation classification, and 5. text classification. In this article, we describe the outcomes of this pilot annotation phase. Through the exercise we have obtained an annotation methodology; and found ten core information units that reflect the contribution of the NLP-ML scholarly investigations. The resulting annotation scheme we developed based on these information units is called NLPContributions. The overarching goal of our endeavor is four-fold: 1) to find a systematic set of patterns of subject-predicate-object statements for the semantic structuring of scholarly contributions that are more or less generically applicable for NLP-ML research articles; 2) to apply the discovered patterns in the creation of a larger annotated dataset for training machine readers of research contributions; 3) to ingest the dataset into the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) infrastructure as a showcase for creating user-friendly state-of-the-art overviews; 4) to integrate the machine readers into the ORKG to assist users in the manual curation of their respective article contributions. We envision that the NLPContributions methodology engenders a wider discussion on the topic toward its further refinement and development. Our pilot annotated dataset of 50 NLP-ML scholarly articles according to the NLPContributions scheme is openly available to the research community at https://doi.org/10.25835/0019761.Comment: In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents (EEKE 2020) co-located with the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020 (JCDL 2020), Virtual Event, China, August 1. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2658

NLPContributions: An Annotation Scheme for Machine Reading of Scholarly Contributions in Natural Language Processing Literature

We describe an annotation initiative to capture the scholarly contributions in natural language processing (NLP) articles, particularly, for the articles that discuss machine learning (ML) approaches for various information extraction tasks. We develop the annotation task based on a pilot annotation exercise on 50 NLP-ML scholarly articles presenting contributions to five information extraction tasks 1. machine translation, 2. named entity recognition, 3. Question answering, 4. relation classification, and 5. text classification. In this article, we describe the outcomes of this pilot annotation phase. Through the exercise we have obtained an annotation methodology; and found ten core information units that reflect the contribution of the NLP-ML scholarly investigations. The resulting annotation scheme we developed based on these information units is called NLPContributions. The overarching goal of our endeavor is four-fold: 1) to find a systematic set of patterns of subject-predicate-object statements for the semantic structuring of scholarly contributions that are more or less generically applicable for NLP-ML research articles; 2) to apply the discovered patterns in the creation of a larger annotated dataset for training machine readers [18] of research contributions; 3) to ingest the dataset into the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) infrastructure as a showcase for creating user-friendly state-of-the-art overviews; 4) to integrate the machine readers into the ORKG to assist users in the manual curation of their respective article contributions. We envision that the NLPContributions methodology engenders a wider discussion on the topic toward its further refinement and development. Our pilot annotated dataset of 50 NLP-ML scholarly articles according to the NLPContributions scheme is openly available to the research community at https://doi.org/10.25835/0019761

ORKG-Leaderboards: a systematic workflow for mining leaderboards as a knowledge graph

The purpose of this work is to describe the orkg-Leaderboard software designed to extract leaderboards defined as task–dataset–metric tuples automatically from large collections of empirical research papers in artificial intelligence (AI). The software can support both the main workflows of scholarly publishing, viz. as LaTeX files or as PDF files. Furthermore, the system is integrated with the open research knowledge graph (ORKG) platform, which fosters the machine-actionable publishing of scholarly findings. Thus, the systemsss output, when integrated within the ORKG’s supported Semantic Web infrastructure of representing machine-actionable ‘resources’ on the Web, enables: (1) broadly, the integration of empirical results of researchers across the world, thus enabling transparency in empirical research with the potential to also being complete contingent on the underlying data source(s) of publications; and (2) specifically, enables researchers to track the progress in AI with an overview of the state-of-the-art across the most common AI tasks and their corresponding datasets via dynamic ORKG frontend views leveraging tables and visualization charts over the machine-actionable data. Our best model achieves performances above 90% F1 on the leaderboard extraction task, thus proving orkg-Leaderboards a practically viable tool for real-world usage. Going forward, in a sense, orkg-Leaderboards transforms the leaderboard extraction task to an automated digitalization task, which has been, for a long time in the community, a crowdsourced endeavor

Requirements Analysis for an Open Research Knowledge Graph

Current science communication has a number of drawbacks and bottlenecks which have been subject of discussion lately: Among others, the rising number of published articles makes it nearly impossible to get an overview of the state of the art in a certain field, or reproducibility is hampered by fixed-length, document-based publications which normally cannot cover all details of a research work. Recently, several initiatives have proposed knowledge graphs (KGs) for organising scientific information as a solution to many of the current issues. The focus of these proposals is, however, usually restricted to very specific use cases. In this paper, we aim to transcend this limited perspective by presenting a comprehensive analysis of requirements for an Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) by (a) collecting daily core tasks of a scientist, (b) establishing their consequential requirements for a KG-based system, (c) identifying overlaps and specificities, and their coverage in current solutions. As a result, we map necessary and desirable requirements for successful KG-based science communication, derive implications and outline possible solutions.Comment: Accepted for publishing in 24th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 202

Requirements Analysis for an Open Research Knowledge Graph

Current science communication has a number of drawbacks and bottlenecks which have been subject of discussion lately: Among others, the rising number of published articles makes it nearly impossible to get a full overview of the state of the art in a certain field, or reproducibility is hampered by fixed-length, document-based publications which normally cannot cover all details of a research work. Recently, several initiatives have proposed knowledge graphs (KGs) for organising scientific information as a solution to many of the current issues. The focus of these proposals is, however, usually restricted to very specific use cases. In this paper, we aim to transcend this limited perspective by presenting a comprehensive analysis of requirements for an Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) by (a) collecting daily core tasks of a scientist, (b) establishing their consequential requirements for a KG-based system, (c) identifying overlaps and specificities, and their coverage in current solutions. As a result, we map necessary and desirable requirements for successful KG-based science communication, derive implications and outline possible solutions

Sentence, Phrase, and Triple Annotations to Build a Knowledge Graph of Natural Language Processing Contributions - A Trial Dataset

This work aims to normalize the NlpContributions scheme (henceforward, NlpContributionGraph) to structure, directly from article sentences, the contributions information in Natural Language Processing (NLP) scholarly articles via a two-stage annotation methodology: 1) pilot stage—to define the scheme (described in prior work); and 2) adjudication stage—to normalize the graphing model (the focus of this paper). We re-annotate, a second time, the contributions-pertinent information across 50 prior-annotated NLP scholarly articles in terms of a data pipeline comprising: contribution-centered sentences, phrases, and triple statements. To this end, specifically, care was taken in the adjudication annotation stage to reduce annotation noise while formulating the guidelines for our proposed novel NLP contributions structuring and graphing scheme. The application of NlpContributionGraph on the 50 articles resulted finally in a dataset of 900 contribution-focused sentences, 4,702 contribution-information-centered phrases, and 2,980 surface-structured triples. The intra-annotation agreement between the first and second stages, in terms of F1-score, was 67.92% for sentences, 41.82% for phrases, and 22.31% for triple statements indicating that with increased granularity of the information, the annotation decision variance is greater. NlpContributionGraph has limited scope for structuring scholarly contributions compared with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Medicine) scholarly knowledge at large. Further, the annotation scheme in this work is designed by only an intra-annotator consensus—a single annotator first annotated the data to propose the initial scheme, following which, the same annotator reannotated the data to normalize the annotations in an adjudication stage. However, the expected goal of this work is to achieve a standardized retrospective model of capturing NLP contributions from scholarly articles. This would entail a larger initiative of enlisting multiple annotators to accommodate different worldviews into a “single” set of structures and relationships as the final scheme. Given that the initial scheme is first proposed and the complexity of the annotation task in the realistic timeframe, our intra-annotation procedure is well-suited. Nevertheless, the model proposed in this work is presently limited since it does not incorporate multiple annotator worldviews. This is planned as future work to produce a robust model. We demonstrate NlpContributionGraph data integrated into the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), a next-generation KG-based digital library with intelligent computations enabled over structured scholarly knowledge, as a viable aid to assist researchers in their day-to-day tasks. NlpContributionGraph is a novel scheme to annotate research contributions from NLP articles and integrate them in a knowledge graph, which to the best of our knowledge does not exist in the community. Furthermore, our quantitative evaluations over the two-stage annotation tasks offer insights into task difficulty

Generating knowledge graphs by employing Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning techniques within the scholarly domain

The continuous growth of scientific literature brings innovations and, at the same time, raises new challenges. One of them is related to the fact that its analysis has become difficult due to the high volume of published papers for which manual effort for annotations and management is required. Novel technological infrastructures are needed to help researchers, research policy makers, and companies to time-efficiently browse, analyse, and forecast scientific research. Knowledge graphs i.e., large networks of entities and relationships, have proved to be effective solution in this space. Scientific knowledge graphs focus on the scholarly domain and typically contain metadata describing research publications such as authors, venues, organizations, research topics, and citations. However, the current generation of knowledge graphs lacks of an explicit representation of the knowledge presented in the research papers. As such, in this paper, we present a new architecture that takes advantage of Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning methods for extracting entities and relationships from research publications and integrates them in a large-scale knowledge graph. Within this research work, we i) tackle the challenge of knowledge extraction by employing several state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing and Text Mining tools, ii) describe an approach for integrating entities and relationships generated by these tools, iii) show the advantage of such an hybrid system over alternative approaches, and vi) as a chosen use case, we generated a scientific knowledge graph including 109,105 triples, extracted from 26,827 abstracts of papers within the Semantic Web domain. As our approach is general and can be applied to any domain, we expect that it can facilitate the management, analysis, dissemination, and processing of scientific knowledge

Cross-Domain information extraction from scientific articles for research knowledge graphs

Today’s scholarly communication is a document-centred process and as such, rather inefficient. Fundamental contents of research papers are not accessible by computers since they are only present in unstructured PDF files. Therefore, current research infrastructures are not able to assist scientists appropriately in their core research tasks. This thesis addresses this issue and proposes methods to automatically extract relevant information from scientific articles for Research Knowledge Graphs (RKGs) that represent scholarly knowledge structured and interlinked. First, this thesis conducts a requirements analysis for an Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG). We present literature-related use cases of researchers that should be supported by an ORKG-based system and their specific requirements for the underlying ontology and instance data. Based on this analysis, the identified use cases are categorised into two groups: The first group of use cases needs manual or semi-automatic approaches for knowledge graph (KG) construction since they require high correctness of the instance data. The second group requires high completeness and can tolerate noisy instance data. Thus, this group needs automatic approaches for KG population. This thesis focuses on the second group of use cases and provides contributions for machine learning tasks that aim to support them. To assess the relevance of a research paper, scientists usually skim through titles, abstracts, introductions, and conclusions. An organised presentation of the articles' essential information would make this process more time-efficient. The task of sequential sentence classification addresses this issue by classifying sentences in an article in categories like research problem, used methods, or obtained results. To address this problem, we propose a novel unified cross-domain multi-task deep learning approach that makes use of datasets from different scientific domains (e.g. biomedicine and computer graphics) and varying structures (e.g. datasets covering either only abstracts or full papers). Our approach outperforms the state of the art on full paper datasets significantly while being competitive for datasets consisting of abstracts. Moreover, our approach enables the categorisation of sentences in a domain-independent manner. Furthermore, we present the novel task of domain-independent information extraction to extract scientific concepts from research papers in a domain-independent manner. This task aims to support the use cases find related work and get recommended articles. For this purpose, we introduce a set of generic scientific concepts that are relevant over ten domains in Science, Technology, and Medicine (STM) and release an annotated dataset of 110 abstracts from these domains. Since the annotation of scientific text is costly, we suggest an active learning strategy based on a state-of-the-art deep learning approach. The proposed method enables us to nearly halve the amount of required training data. Then, we extend this domain-independent information extraction approach with the task of \textit{coreference resolution}. Coreference resolution aims to identify mentions that refer to the same concept or entity. Baseline results on our corpus with current state-of-the-art approaches for coreference resolution showed that current approaches perform poorly on scientific text. Therefore, we propose a sequential transfer learning approach that exploits annotated datasets from non-academic domains. Our experimental results demonstrate that our approach noticeably outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines. Additionally, we investigate the impact of coreference resolution on KG population. We demonstrate that coreference resolution has a small impact on the number of resulting concepts in the KG, but improved its quality significantly. Consequently, using our domain-independent information extraction approach, we populate an RKG from 55,485 abstracts of the ten investigated STM domains. We show that every domain mainly uses its own terminology and that the populated RKG contains useful concepts. Moreover, we propose a novel approach for the task of \textit{citation recommendation}. This task can help researchers improve the quality of their work by finding or recommending relevant related work. Our approach exploits RKGs that interlink research papers based on mentioned scientific concepts. Using our automatically populated RKG, we demonstrate that the combination of information from RKGs with existing state-of-the-art approaches is beneficial. Finally, we conclude the thesis and sketch possible directions of future work.Die Kommunikation von Forschungsergebnissen erfolgt heutzutage in Form von Dokumenten und ist aus verschiedenen Gründen ineffizient. Wesentliche Inhalte von Forschungsarbeiten sind für Computer nicht zugänglich, da sie in unstrukturierten PDF-Dateien verborgen sind. Daher können derzeitige Forschungsinfrastrukturen Forschende bei ihren Kernaufgaben nicht angemessen unterstützen. Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit dieser Problemstellung und untersucht Methoden zur automatischen Extraktion von relevanten Informationen aus Forschungspapieren für Forschungswissensgraphen (Research Knowledge Graphs). Solche Graphen sollen wissenschaftliches Wissen maschinenlesbar strukturieren und verknüpfen. Zunächst wird eine Anforderungsanalyse für einen Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) durchgeführt. Wir stellen literaturbezogene Anwendungsfälle von Forschenden vor, die durch ein ORKG-basiertes System unterstützt werden sollten, und deren spezifische Anforderungen an die zugrundeliegende Ontologie und die Instanzdaten. Darauf aufbauend werden die identifizierten Anwendungsfälle in zwei Gruppen eingeteilt: Die erste Gruppe von Anwendungsfällen benötigt manuelle oder halbautomatische Ansätze für die Konstruktion eines ORKG, da sie eine hohe Korrektheit der Instanzdaten erfordern. Die zweite Gruppe benötigt eine hohe Vollständigkeit der Instanzdaten und kann fehlerhafte Daten tolerieren. Daher erfordert diese Gruppe automatische Ansätze für die Konstruktion des ORKG. Diese Arbeit fokussiert sich auf die zweite Gruppe von Anwendungsfällen und schlägt Methoden für maschinelle Aufgabenstellungen vor, die diese Anwendungsfälle unterstützen können. Um die Relevanz eines Forschungsartikels effizient beurteilen zu können, schauen sich Forschende in der Regel die Titel, Zusammenfassungen, Einleitungen und Schlussfolgerungen an. Durch eine strukturierte Darstellung von wesentlichen Informationen des Artikels könnte dieser Prozess zeitsparender gestaltet werden. Die Aufgabenstellung der sequenziellen Satzklassifikation befasst sich mit diesem Problem, indem Sätze eines Artikels in Kategorien wie Forschungsproblem, verwendete Methoden oder erzielte Ergebnisse automatisch klassifiziert werden. In dieser Arbeit wird für diese Aufgabenstellung ein neuer vereinheitlichter Multi-Task Deep-Learning-Ansatz vorgeschlagen, der Datensätze aus verschiedenen wissenschaftlichen Bereichen (z. B. Biomedizin und Computergrafik) mit unterschiedlichen Strukturen (z. B. Datensätze bestehend aus Zusammenfassungen oder vollständigen Artikeln) nutzt. Unser Ansatz übertrifft State-of-the-Art-Verfahren der Literatur auf Benchmark-Datensätzen bestehend aus vollständigen Forschungsartikeln. Außerdem ermöglicht unser Ansatz die Klassifizierung von Sätzen auf eine domänenunabhängige Weise. Darüber hinaus stellen wir die neue Aufgabenstellung domänenübergreifende Informationsextraktion vor. Hierbei werden, unabhängig vom behandelten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebiet, inhaltliche Konzepte aus Forschungspapieren extrahiert. Damit sollen die Anwendungsfälle Finden von verwandten Arbeiten und Empfehlung von Artikeln unterstützt werden. Zu diesem Zweck führen wir eine Reihe von generischen wissenschaftlichen Konzepten ein, die in zehn Bereichen der Wissenschaft, Technologie und Medizin (STM) relevant sind, und veröffentlichen einen annotierten Datensatz von 110 Zusammenfassungen aus diesen Bereichen. Da die Annotation wissenschaftlicher Texte aufwändig ist, kombinieren wir ein Active-Learning-Verfahren mit einem aktuellen Deep-Learning-Ansatz, um die notwendigen Trainingsdaten zu reduzieren. Die vorgeschlagene Methode ermöglicht es uns, die Menge der erforderlichen Trainingsdaten nahezu zu halbieren. Anschließend erweitern wir unseren domänenunabhängigen Ansatz zur Informationsextraktion um die Aufgabe der Koreferenzauflösung. Die Auflösung von Koreferenzen zielt darauf ab, Erwähnungen zu identifizieren, die sich auf dasselbe Konzept oder dieselbe Entität beziehen. Experimentelle Ergebnisse auf unserem Korpus mit aktuellen Ansätzen zur Koreferenzauflösung haben gezeigt, dass diese bei wissenschaftlichen Texten unzureichend abschneiden. Daher schlagen wir eine Transfer-Learning-Methode vor, die annotierte Datensätze aus nicht-akademischen Bereichen nutzt. Die experimentellen Ergebnisse zeigen, dass unser Ansatz deutlich besser abschneidet als die bisherigen Ansätze. Darüber hinaus untersuchen wir den Einfluss der Koreferenzauflösung auf die Erstellung von Wissensgraphen. Wir zeigen, dass diese einen geringen Einfluss auf die Anzahl der resultierenden Konzepte in dem Wissensgraphen hat, aber die Qualität des Wissensgraphen deutlich verbessert. Mithilfe unseres domänenunabhängigen Ansatzes zur Informationsextraktion haben wir aus 55.485 Zusammenfassungen der zehn untersuchten STM-Domänen einen Forschungswissensgraphen erstellt. Unsere Analyse zeigt, dass jede Domäne hauptsächlich ihre eigene Terminologie verwendet und dass der erstellte Wissensgraph nützliche Konzepte enthält. Schließlich schlagen wir einen Ansatz für die Empfehlung von passenden Referenzen vor. Damit können Forschende einfacher relevante verwandte Arbeiten finden oder passende Empfehlungen erhalten. Unser Ansatz nutzt Forschungswissensgraphen, die Forschungsarbeiten mit in ihnen erwähnten wissenschaftlichen Konzepten verknüpfen. Wir zeigen, dass aktuelle Verfahren zur Empfehlung von Referenzen von zusätzlichen Informationen aus einem automatisch erstellten Wissensgraphen profitieren. Zum Schluss wird ein Fazit gezogen und ein Ausblick für mögliche zukünftige Arbeiten gegeben