806 research outputs found

    Practical Aspects of Data Mining Using LISp-Miner

    Get PDF
    The paper describes some practical aspects of using LISp-Miner for data mining. LISp-Miner is a software tool that is under development at the University of Economics, Prague. We will review the different types of knowledge patterns discovered by the system, and discuss their applicability for various data mining tasks. We also compare LISp-Miner 18.16 with Weka 3.6.9 and Rapid Miner 5.3

    ENDORSEMENT OF SMALL PATIENTS POPULATION STUDY THROUGH DATA MINING CLASSIFICATION: SIGNIFICANCE TO MANIFEST DRUG INTERACTION STUDY OF CARDIOVASCULAR DOSAGE FORMULATION

    Get PDF
    Objective: A simple, sensitive, precise computational classifiers justifies the positive indication of drug interaction through statistical validation and confirms for further root level investigation. Methods: The blood pressure (BP) & Lipid profile valued data sheet was prepared from 100 patients those were chronically treating with cardiovascular formulation consisting Atorvastatin 10mg + Olmesartan 20mg. The data sheet contains 100 patients with 10 variables and final decision attributes of working & non-working. Then, with the operation of seven different related classifier the details of % of accuracy by class, correct & incorrect classified instance and stratified cross- validation were estimated. Those statistical results of classifiers were compared, correlate and interpreted to bring a fixed conclusion based on it. Results: The % of accuracy for all classifiers results commonly 95.9596 %, 93.9394 % and 96.9697 % and inter-depending class attributes denoting by a = NW & b =W Matrix values are 84│11, 84│9, 87│9 respectively. Thus, the accuracy is excellent covering within the limits of (±15%) as a correct classified instant. Conclusion: Statistical computation on less populated patients through classifiers, evidentially confirms the drug-interaction profile of collected data through data mining process. So that, it can proceeds further upto root level through instrumental bioanalysis. Â&nbsp

    Classification-based data mining for identification of risk patterns associated with hypertension in Middle Eastern population A 12-year longitudinal study

    Get PDF
    Hypertension is a critical public health concern worldwide. Identification of risk factors using traditional multivariable models has been a field of active research. The present study was undertaken to identify risk patterns associated with hypertension incidence using data mining methods in a cohort of Iranian adult population. Data on 6205 participants (44 men) age > 20 years, free from hypertension at baseline with no history of cardiovascular disease, were used to develop a series of prediction models by 3 types of decision tree (DT) algorithms. The performances of all classifiers were evaluated on the testing data set. The Quick Unbiased Efficient Statistical Tree algorithm among men and women and Classification and Regression Tree among the total population had the best performance. The C-statistic and sensitivity for the prediction models were (0.70 and 71) in men, (0.79 and 71) in women, and (0.78 and 72) in total population, respectively. In DT models, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, age, and waist circumference significantly contributed to the risk of incident hypertension in both genders and total population, wrist circumference and 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose among women and fasting plasma glucose among men. In men, the highest hypertension risk was seen in those with SBP > 115mm Hg and age > 30 years. In women those with SBP > 114 mmHg and age>33 years had the highest risk for hypertension. For the total population, higher risk was observed in those with SBP > 114mm Hg and age > 38 years. Our study emphasizes the utility of DTs for prediction of hypertension and exploring interaction between predictors. DT models used the easily available variables to identify homogeneous subgroups with different risk pattern for the hypertension. Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All
    corecore