Dynamic set-up rules for hybrid flow shop scheduling with parallel batching machines

An S-stage hybrid (or flexible) flow shop, with sequence-independent uniform set-up times, parallel batching machines with compatible parallel batch families (like in casting or heat treatments in furnaces, chemical or galvanic baths, painting in autoclave, etc.) has been analysed with the purpose of reducing the number of tardy jobs (and the makespan); in Graham’s notation: FPB(m_1, m_2, … , m_S)|p-batch, STsi,b|SUM(Ui). Jobs are sorted dynamically (at each new delivery); batches are closed within sliding (or rolling) time windows and processed in parallel by multiple identical machines. Computation experiments have shown the better performance on benchmarks of the two proposed heuristics based on new formulations of the critical ratio (CRsetup) considering the ratio of allowance set-up and processing time in the scheduling horizon, which improves the weighted modified operation due date rule

Scheduling in assembly type job-shops

Assembly type job-shop scheduling is a generalization of the job-shop scheduling problem to include assembly operations. In the assembly type job-shops scheduling problem, there are n jobs which are to be processed on in workstations and each job has a due date. Each job visits one or more workstations in a predetermined route. The primary difference between this new problem and the classical job-shop problem is that two or more jobs can merge to foul\u27 a new job at a specified workstation, that is job convergence is permitted. This feature cannot be modeled by existing job-shop techniques. In this dissertation, we develop scheduling procedures for the assembly type job-shop with the objective of minimizing total weighted tardiness. Three types of workstations are modeled: single machine, parallel machine, and batch machine. We label this new scheduling procedure as SB. The SB procedure is heuristic in nature and is derived from the shifting bottleneck concept. SB decomposes the assembly type job-shop scheduling problem into several workstation scheduling sub-problems. Various types of techniques are used in developing the scheduling heuristics for these sub-problems including the greedy method, beam search, critical path analysis, local search, and dynamic programming. The performance of SB is validated on a set of test problems and compared with priority rules that are normally used in practice. The results show that SB outperforms the priority rules by an average of 19% - 36% for the test problems. SB is extended to solve scheduling problems with other objectives including minimizing the maximum completion time, minimizing weighted flow time and minimizing maximum weighted lateness. Comparisons with the test problems, indicate that SB outperforms the priority rules for these objectives as well. The SB procedure and its accompanying logic is programmed into an object oriented scheduling system labeled as LEKIN. The LEKIN program includes a standard library of scheduling rules and hence can be used as a platform for the development of new scheduling heuristics. In industrial applications LEKIN allows schedulers to obtain effective machine schedules rapidly. The results from this research allow us to increase shop utilization, improve customer satisfaction, and lower work-in-process inventory without a major capital investment

Heuristics for scheduling a two-stage hybrid flow shop with parallel batching machines: application at a hospital sterilisation plant

The model of a two-stage hybrid (or flexible) flow shop, with sequence-independent uniform setup times, parallel batching machines and parallel batches has been analysed with the purpose of reducing the number of tardy jobs and the makespan in a sterilisation plant. Jobs are processed in parallel batches by multiple identical parallel machines. Manual operations preceding each of the two stages have been dealt with as machine setup with standardised times and are sequence-independent. A mixed-integer model is proposed. Two heuristics have been tested on real benchmark data from an existing sterilisation plant: constrained size of parallel batches and fixed time slots. Computation experiments performed on combinations of machines and operator numbers suggest balancing the two stages by assigning operators proportionally to the setup time requirements

Evolutionary methods for the design of dispatching rules for complex and dynamic scheduling problems

Three methods, based on Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), to support and automate the design of dispatching rules for complex and dynamic scheduling problems are proposed in this thesis. The first method employs an EA to search for problem instances on which a given dispatching rule performs badly. These instances can then be analysed to reveal weaknesses of the tested rule, thereby providing guidelines for the design of a better rule. The other two methods are hyper-heuristics, which employ an EA directly to generate effective dispatching rules. In particular, one hyper-heuristic is based on a specific type of EA, called Genetic Programming (GP), and generates a single rule from basic job and machine attributes, while the other generates a set of work centre-specific rules by selecting a (potentially) different rule for each work centre from a number of existing rules. Each of the three methods is applied to some complex and dynamic scheduling problem(s), and the resulting dispatching rules are tested against benchmark rules from the literature. In each case, the benchmark rules are shown to be outperformed by a rule (set) that results from the application of the respective method, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed methods

Group Scheduling in a Cellular Manufacturing Shop to Minimise Total Tardiness and nT: a Comparative Genetic Algorithm and Mathematical Modelling Approach

In this paper, family and job scheduling in a cellular manufacturing shop is addressed where jobs have individual due dates. The objectives are to minimise total tardiness and the number of tardy jobs. Family splitting among cells is allowed but job splitting is not. Two optimisation methods are employed in order to solve this problem, namely mathematical modelling (MM) and genetic algorithm (GA). The results showed that GA found the optimal solution for most of the problems with high frequency. Furthermore, the proposed GA is efficient compared to the MM especially for larger problems in terms of execution times. Other critical aspects of the problem such as family preemption only, impact of family splitting on common due date scenarios and dual objective scenarios are also solved. In short, the proposed comparative approach provides critical insights for the group scheduling problem in a cellular manufacturing shop with distinctive cases

Geometric and harmonic means based priority dispatching rules for single machine scheduling problems

[EN] This work proposes two new prority dispatching rules (PDRs) for solving single machine scheduling problems. These rules are based on the geometric mean (GM) and harmonic mean (HM) of the processing time (PT) and the due date (DD) and they are referred to as GMPD and HMPD respectively. Performance of the proposed PDRs is evaluated on the basis of five measures/criteria i.e. Total Flow Time (TFT), Total Lateness (TL), Number of Late Jobs (TNL), Total Earliness (TE) and Number of Early Parts (TNE). It is found that GMPD performs better than other PDRs in achieving optimal values of multiple performance measures. Further, effect of variation in the weight assigned to PT and DD on the combined performance of TFT and TL is also examined which reveals that for deriving optimal values of TFT and TL, weighted harmonic mean (WHMPD) rule with a weight of 0.105 outperforms other PDRs. The weighted geometric mean (WGMPD) rule with a weight of 0.37 is found to be the next after WHMPD followed by the weighted PDT i.e. WPDT rule with a weight of 0.76.Ahmad, S.; Khan, ZA.; Ali, M.; Asjad, M. (2021). Geometric and harmonic means based priority dispatching rules for single machine scheduling problems. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering. 9(2):93-102. https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2021.15217OJS9310292Baharom, M. Z., Nazdah, W., &Hussin, W. (2015). Scheduling Analysis for Job Sequencing in Veneer Lamination Line. Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.12720/jiii.3.3.181-185Chan, F. T. S., Chan, H. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Ip, R. W. L. (2003). Analysis of dynamic dispatching rules for a flexible manufacturing system. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138(1), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00093-1Cheng, T. C. E., &Kahlbacher, H. G. (1993). Single-machine scheduling to minimize earliness and number of tardy jobs. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 77(3), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940450da Silva, N. C. O., Scarpin, C. T., Pécora, J. E., & Ruiz, A. (2019). Online single machine scheduling with setup times depending on the jobs sequence. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.038Doh, H.H., Yu, J.M., Kim, J.S., Lee, D.H., & Nam, S.H. (2013). A priority scheduling approach for flexible job shops with multiple process plans. International Journal of Production Research, 51(12), 3748-3764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.765074Dominic, Panneer D. D., Kaliyamoorthy, S., & Kumar, M. S. (2004). Efficient dispatching rules for dynamic job shop scheduling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(1), 70-75.Ðurasević, M., &Jakobović, D. (2018). A survey of dispatching rules for the dynamic unrelated machines environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 113, 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.053Forrester, P. (2006). Operations Management: An Integrated Approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.Geiger, C. D., &Uzsoy, R. (2008). Learning effective dispatching rules for batch processor scheduling. International Journal of Production Research, 46(6), 1431-1454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600993360Hamidi, M. (2016). Two new sequencing rules for the non-preemptive single machine scheduling problem. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 15(2), 116-127.Holthaus, O., & Rajendran, C. (1997). New dispatching rules for scheduling in a job shop-An experimental study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13(2), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01225761Hussain, M. S., & Ali, M. (2019). A Multi-agent Based Dynamic Scheduling of Flexible Manufacturing Systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(3), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00214-9Jayamohan, M. S., & Rajendran, C. (2000). New dispatching rules for shop scheduling: A step forward. International Journal of Production Research, 38(3), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075400189301Kadipasaoglu, S. N., Xiang, W., &Khumawala, B. M. (1997). A comparison of sequencing rules in static and dynamic hybrid flow systems. International Journal of Production Research, 35(5), 1359-1384. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075497195371Kanet, J. J., & Li, X. (2004). A Weighted Modified Due Date Rule for Sequencing to Minimize Weighted Tardiness. Journal of Scheduling, 7(4), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOSH.0000031421.64487.95Lee, D.K., Shin, J.H., & Lee, D.H. (2020). Operations scheduling for an advanced flexible manufacturing system with multi-fixturing pallets. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 144, 106496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106496Lu, C.C., Lin, S.W., & Ying, K.C. (2012). Robust scheduling on a single machine to minimize total flow time. Computers & Operations Research, 39(7), 1682-1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.10.003Krishnan, M., Chinnusamy, T. R., & Karthikeyan, T. (2012). Performance Study of Flexible Manufacturing System Scheduling Using Dispatching Rules in Dynamic Environment. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2793-2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.327Munir, E. U., Li, J., Shi, S., Zou, Z., & Yang, D. (2008). MaxStd: A task scheduling heuristic for heterogeneous computing environment. Information Technology Journal, 7(4), 679-683. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2008.679.683Oyetunji, E. O. (2009). Some common performance measures in scheduling problems. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 6-9.Pinedo, M. L. (2009). Planning and Scheduling in Manufacturing and Services (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0910-7Prakash, A., Chan, F. T. S., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2011). FMS scheduling with knowledge based genetic algorithm approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3161-3171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.002Rafsanjani, M. K., &Bardsiri, A. K. (2012). A New Heuristic Approach for Scheduling Independent Tasks on Heterogeneous Computing Systems. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMLC.2012.V2.147Tyagi, N., Tripathi, R. P., &Chandramouli, A. B. (2016). Single Machine Scheduling Model with Total Tardiness Problem. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(37). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i37/97527Vinod, V., & Sridharan, R. (2008). Dynamic job-shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times: Simulation modeling and analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0836-4Waikar, A. M., Sarker, B. R., & Lal, A. M. (1995). A comparative study of some priority dispatching rules under different shop loads. Production Planning & Control, 6(4), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953728950893028