On the tractability of some natural packing, covering and partitioning problems

In this paper we fix 7 types of undirected graphs: paths, paths with prescribed endvertices, circuits, forests, spanning trees, (not necessarily spanning) trees and cuts. Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and two "object types" $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{B}$ chosen from the alternatives above, we consider the following questions. \textbf{Packing problem:} can we find an object of type $\mathrm{A}$ and one of type $\mathrm{B}$ in the edge set $E$ of $G$, so that they are edge-disjoint? \textbf{Partitioning problem:} can we partition $E$ into an object of type $\mathrm{A}$ and one of type $\mathrm{B}$? \textbf{Covering problem:} can we cover $E$ with an object of type $\mathrm{A}$, and an object of type $\mathrm{B}$? This framework includes 44 natural graph theoretic questions. Some of these problems were well-known before, for example covering the edge-set of a graph with two spanning trees, or finding an $s$-$t$ path $P$ and an $s'$-$t'$ path $P'$ that are edge-disjoint. However, many others were not, for example can we find an $s$-$t$ path $P\subseteq E$ and a spanning tree $T\subseteq E$ that are edge-disjoint? Most of these previously unknown problems turned out to be NP-complete, many of them even in planar graphs. This paper determines the status of these 44 problems. For the NP-complete problems we also investigate the planar version, for the polynomial problems we consider the matroidal generalization (wherever this makes sense)

Three ways to cover a graph

We consider the problem of covering an input graph $H$ with graphs from a fixed covering class $G$. The classical covering number of $H$ with respect to $G$ is the minimum number of graphs from $G$ needed to cover the edges of $H$ without covering non-edges of $H$. We introduce a unifying notion of three covering parameters with respect to $G$, two of which are novel concepts only considered in special cases before: the local and the folded covering number. Each parameter measures "how far'' $H$ is from $G$ in a different way. Whereas the folded covering number has been investigated thoroughly for some covering classes, e.g., interval graphs and planar graphs, the local covering number has received little attention. We provide new bounds on each covering number with respect to the following covering classes: linear forests, star forests, caterpillar forests, and interval graphs. The classical graph parameters that result this way are interval number, track number, linear arboricity, star arboricity, and caterpillar arboricity. As input graphs we consider graphs of bounded degeneracy, bounded degree, bounded tree-width or bounded simple tree-width, as well as outerplanar, planar bipartite, and planar graphs. For several pairs of an input class and a covering class we determine exactly the maximum ordinary, local, and folded covering number of an input graph with respect to that covering class.Comment: 20 pages, 4 figure

Partitions and Coverings of Trees by Bounded-Degree Subtrees

This paper addresses the following questions for a given tree $T$ and integer $d\geq2$: (1) What is the minimum number of degree-$d$ subtrees that partition $E(T)$? (2) What is the minimum number of degree-$d$ subtrees that cover $E(T)$? We answer the first question by providing an explicit formula for the minimum number of subtrees, and we describe a linear time algorithm that finds the corresponding partition. For the second question, we present a polynomial time algorithm that computes a minimum covering. We then establish a tight bound on the number of subtrees in coverings of trees with given maximum degree and pathwidth. Our results show that pathwidth is the right parameter to consider when studying coverings of trees by degree-3 subtrees. We briefly consider coverings of general graphs by connected subgraphs of bounded degree

Boxicity and separation dimension

A family $\mathcal{F}$ of permutations of the vertices of a hypergraph $H$ is called 'pairwise suitable' for $H$ if, for every pair of disjoint edges in $H$, there exists a permutation in $\mathcal{F}$ in which all the vertices in one edge precede those in the other. The cardinality of a smallest such family of permutations for $H$ is called the 'separation dimension' of $H$ and is denoted by $\pi(H)$. Equivalently, $\pi(H)$ is the smallest natural number $k$ so that the vertices of $H$ can be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^k$ such that any two disjoint edges of $H$ can be separated by a hyperplane normal to one of the axes. We show that the separation dimension of a hypergraph $H$ is equal to the 'boxicity' of the line graph of $H$. This connection helps us in borrowing results and techniques from the extensive literature on boxicity to study the concept of separation dimension.Comment: This is the full version of a paper by the same name submitted to WG-2014. Some results proved in this paper are also present in arXiv:1212.6756. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1212.675