160,852 research outputs found

    Subfactors of index less than 5, part 2: triple points

    Full text link
    We summarize the known obstructions to subfactors with principal graphs which begin with a triple point. One is based on Jones's quadratic tangles techniques, although we apply it in a novel way. The other two are based on connections techniques; one due to Ocneanu, and the other previously unpublished, although likely known to Haagerup. We then apply these obstructions to the classification of subfactors with index below 5. In particular, we eliminate three of the five families of possible principal graphs called "weeds" in the classification from arXiv:1007.1730.Comment: 28 pages, many figures. Completely revised from v1: many additional or stronger result

    Algebraic extensions in free groups

    Full text link
    The aim of this paper is to unify the points of view of three recent and independent papers (Ventura 1997, Margolis, Sapir and Weil 2001 and Kapovich and Miasnikov 2002), where similar modern versions of a 1951 theorem of Takahasi were given. We develop a theory of algebraic extensions for free groups, highlighting the analogies and differences with respect to the corresponding classical field-theoretic notions, and we discuss in detail the notion of algebraic closure. We apply that theory to the study and the computation of certain algebraic properties of subgroups (e.g. being malnormal, pure, inert or compressed, being closed in certain profinite topologies) and the corresponding closure operators. We also analyze the closure of a subgroup under the addition of solutions of certain sets of equations.Comment: 35 page

    Gamma-Set Domination Graphs. I: Complete Biorientations of \u3cem\u3eq-\u3c/em\u3eExtended Stars and Wounded Spider Graphs

    Get PDF
    The domination number of a graph G, γ(G), and the domination graph of a digraph D, dom(D) are integrated in this paper. The γ-set domination graph of the complete biorientation of a graph G, domγ(G) is created. All γ-sets of specific trees T are found, and dom-γ(T) is characterized for those classes

    On Haagerup's list of potential principal graphs of subfactors

    Full text link
    We show that any graph, in the sequence given by Haagerup in 1991 as that of candidates of principal graphs of subfactors, is not realized as a principal graph except for the smallest two. This settles the remaining case of a previous work of the first author.Comment: 19 page

    Surface Words are Determined by Word Measures on Groups

    Full text link
    Every word ww in a free group naturally induces a probability measure on every compact group GG. For example, if w=[x,y]w=\left[x,y\right] is the commutator word, a random element sampled by the ww-measure is given by the commutator [g,h]\left[g,h\right] of two independent, Haar-random elements of GG. Back in 1896, Frobenius showed that if GG is a finite group and ψ\psi an irreducible character, then the expected value of ψ([g,h])\psi\left(\left[g,h\right]\right) is 1ψ(e)\frac{1}{\psi\left(e\right)}. This is true for any compact group, and completely determines the [x,y]\left[x,y\right]-measure on these groups. An analogous result holds with the commutator word replaced by any surface word. We prove a converse to this theorem: if ww induces the same measure as [x,y]\left[x,y\right] on every compact group, then, up to an automorphism of the free group, ww is equal to [x,y]\left[x,y\right]. The same holds when [x,y]\left[x,y\right] is replaced by any surface word. The proof relies on the analysis of word measures on unitary groups and on orthogonal groups, which appears in separate papers, and on new analysis of word measures on generalized symmetric groups that we develop here.Comment: 16 pages, fixed the proof of Theorem 3.6, updated reference
    • …
    corecore