9,153 research outputs found
Barnes Hospital Bulletin
Get PDFhttps://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/bjc_barnes_bulletin/1001/thumbnail.jp
Self-Evaluation Applied Mathematics 2003-2008 University of Twente
Get PDFThis report contains the self-study for the research assessment of the Department of Applied Mathematics (AM) of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS) at the University of Twente (UT). The report provides the information for the Research Assessment Committee for Applied Mathematics, dealing with mathematical sciences at the three universities of technology in the Netherlands. It describes the state of affairs pertaining to the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2008
Monitor Newsletter September 11, 1989
Get PDFOfficial Publication of Bowling Green State University for Faculty and Staffhttps://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/monitor/1984/thumbnail.jp
Washington University Record, September 15, 2000
Get PDFhttps://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/record/1871/thumbnail.jp
Aquilegia, Vol. 29 No. 3, May-July 2005: Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society
Get PDFhttps://epublications.regis.edu/aquilegia/1105/thumbnail.jp
The Track Record on Takings Legislation: Lessons from Democracy\u27s Laboratories
Get PDFThis report by the Georgetown Environmental Law & Policy Institute, entitled The Track Record on Takings Legislation: Lessons from Democracy\u27s Laboratories, examines the experiences of Florida, Oregon, and several other states with legislation implementing the property rights agenda. The report is the first comprehensive effort to systematically identify and evaluate the on-the-ground consequences of so-called takings compensation laws. The major findings of the report are that the takings agenda has undermined community protections by forcing a roll back of existing legal rules and/or by exerting a chilling effect on new legislative activity, special interests such as developers and timber companies have been the primary beneficiaries of takings legislation, the takings laws have fomented and exacerbated neighbor-neighbor conflicts over land use issues, the takings agenda has conferred large windfalls on certain owners either in the form of taxpayer-funded awards or special exemptions from the rules that apply to the rest of the community, and the property rights agenda has undermined the democratic process. Contrary to a common argument made by proponents of this type of legislation, requiring the government to pay to regulate does not lead government officials to make a more nuanced appraisal of the costs and benefits of regulations, apparently because the salience of fiscal costs to government officials far outweighs the relatively more diffuse political benefits of community and homeowner protection
- …
