#SocialMediaEd: Perspectives on Teaching about and with Social Media in Higher Education

Within the field of education and informational technology, technologies like social media — near ubiquitous in the lives of today’s high school and college students — raise interesting questions about learning, teaching, literacy, design and democracy for researchers and educators. In this panel we considered multiple perspectives on teaching with and about social media from researchers at five different institutions. Three panelists: Greenhow, Gleason and Krutka all teach variations of a Social Media in Education course within graduate programs at their respective universities and each presented an overview of their course goals and curriculum. Description of these courses was enriched by commentary from the panel chair and moderator, also social media in education researchers. The session was organized for maximum audience participation to advance conversations about an essential social media in higher education curriculum across institutions and how to implement and evaluate it

MMU: 04/12/21–04/18/21

General Announcements and Reminders Crossings is open Monday thru Friday 7:30-4:00. Daily Specials. Crossings and Grubhub Partnership CDO Announcements Moot Court 1L Tournament IP & Technology Law Program\u27s Annual Writing Competition Prepare to Practice Consultations NDLS Office Hours with Undergrads SBA Store Christian Legal Society Morning Prayer Mass Schedule Rape Kit Backlog Panel IP Attaché Information Session Department of Justice Tax Division Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in his Own Words Screening Clinic Information Session 5 Questions with Senator Todd Young on his career in public service The Regulation of Social Media with Alumni and Colleagues in China The Regulation of Social Media in the U.S. and China/April Webinar Free International Snacks! Write-On Information Session: Bluebook Quiz Workshop The Al Mahdi Case and ICC Building an Anti-Racist Vocabulary: Politics of Racial Resentment Resources and Updates Legal Writing Center The Current Students Section of the NDLS Website Health & Wellness Information NDLS News Recommendations SBA Dropbox COVID Corner A Message from the Editor 1L of the Week: Tucker Golay 3LOL: Allison Pop

Innovation is created by humans, not by systems: an exploration of user involvement in living labs: user motivation versus lead user criteria

The past few years companies have become more interested in involving users during the production process of their products. On the other hand, a group of users started to innovate on their own. Users also became interested in becoming part of the production processes themselves. Certain users experience certain needs earlier than others and they enjoy finding solutions for these needs. They are called Lead Users (von Hippel, 2005). Living Labs are one possibility for users to realize this interest to innovate. iLab.o, the Living Lab division of iMinds, has been organizing Living Lab research since 2009. To get a better view on the motivations of this panel, we analyzed the behavior of the involved users from September 2009 to December 2013. We tried to detect Lead Users, but it is not obvious to define people as Lead Users because of the different used definitions. Instead, we divided this panel into three types of users based on the intensity of their involvement: passive, sleeping and active users. A small group of users is extremely active and are been defined as “alpha users”. Based on interviews with these alpha users in November and December 2013, a better view on their motivations to keep participating in Living Lab research was made. In this paper we focus on the participation of these different user types in one research phase type within Living Lab research, more specifically co-creation sessions. By means of a comparative case study, we tried to get a better understanding of the behavior of the different user types. It became clear that in order to keep the panel involved it is important to focus on community building

CHORUS Deliverable 4.5: Report of the 3rd CHORUS Conference

The third and last CHORUS conference on Multimedia Search Engines took place from the 26th to the 27th of May 2009 in Brussels, Belgium. About 100 participants from 15 European countries, the US, Japan and Australia learned about the latest developments in the domain. An exhibition of 13 stands presented 16 research projects currently ongoing around the world

PLACE Events 2016-2017

This document describes PLACE events at Linfield College for 2016-2017

Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: insights from the LeYLab

Living labs have emerged on the crossroads of the open innovation and user innovation frameworks. As open innovation systems, living labs consist of various actors with each playing their specific role. Within this article, we will take an open innovation perspective by analyzing the knowledge spill-overs between living lab actors through three in-depth innovation case studies taking place within the LeYLab living lab in Kortrijk, Belgium. The results illustrate how living labs foster the three open innovation processes of exploration, exploitation, and retention. From our analysis, we conclude that living labs are particularly useful for exploration and, to a lesser extent, exploitation. In terms of retention, living labs seem to hold a large potential; however, the success and the nature of the innovation processes depend on the sustainability of living labs, the number of innovation cases, and the alignment of these cases with the living lab infrastructure. Based on these findings, a concrete set of guidelines is proposed for innovating in living labs and for setting up a living lab constellation. - See more at: http://timreview.ca/article/743#sthash.1DkRkCxW.dpu

Digital communities: context for leading learning into the future?

In 2011, a robust, on-campus, three-element Community of Practice model consisting of growing community, sharing of practice and building domain knowledge was piloted in a digital learning environment. An interim evaluation of the pilot study revealed that the three-element framework, when used in a digital environment, required a fourth element. This element, which appears to happen incidentally in the face-to-face context, is that of reflecting, reporting and revising. This paper outlines the extension of the pilot study to the national tertiary education context in order to explore the implications for the design, leadership roles, and selection of appropriate technologies to support and sustain digital communities using the four-element model

Virtues of violence: a testimonial performance or, an affidavit of lies, excuses and justifications

This is a performance lecture of statements/ records/ made up lies. We collected testimonies that spoke of some of the violences that we are facing – from Greece and Turkey - but these glimpses of frustration, bruising, broken dreams are evident everywhere, with different masks and excuses: ‘neoliberalism’/ ‘extremism’/ ‘factionism’/‘unionism’. All have the common suggestion: that this is how we play the game